Part 2 of the results of the Swedish bad batch analysis that confirms the Danish study - 3/4 of adverse events in Sweden were amongst women
Not so fun fact: 75% of Swedish adverse events were reported on behalf of women.
Not a single Danish newspaper is publishing these results. The research was crowd funded, instead of being compiled by government agencies – these agencies could give a rat’s hairy ass!
From this 18-minute video here.
Swedish pfizer side effects (youtube.com)
“With Dr. Vibeke Manniche, MD PhD. Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (2023). This research from Denmark work is only funded by crowd funding, via this link,
https://www.givesendgo.com/
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1... Reports of Batch-Dependent Suspected Adverse Events of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine: Comparison of Results from Denmark and Sweden https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39202... 2023, Nationwide study from Denmark Identified a batch-dependent safety signal for the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine 2024, Suspected adverse events (SAEs) Denmark and Sweden SAEs reported to national authorities”
It is interesting and encouraging that Google/Alphabet is allowing this video to screen on YouTube.
Perhaps the tack is (as Martin Neil outlined in a prior thread) a third leg of the con-game where a pacifying influencer butts in to rationalise the deception/con and lower the temperature/chance of retribution!
Onwards!!!
Please take a (paid or unpaid) subscription or forward this article to those you think might be interested. You can also donate via Ko-fi – any amount from three dollars upwards. Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan
She refused to share her data with Substack’s most detailed data expert, Albert, the Eagle, because he is a data expert and not a scientist. I am deeply disappointed in her. To call for transparency and not practice transparency is hypocrisy.
I think you might mean bad batch in your stack title.