30% of the UK population refused the toxic C19 injections - between July 2021 and May 2023 94% of deaths were amongst those who took at least one injection – 95% of C19 deaths in early 2023 vaxxed
From here:
The data excludes the tens of thousands killed by the Midazolam plus morphine end of life treatment protocols inflicted in the early months of 2020 and addresses some of the deaths, six months after the roll-out of C19 injections up to 6 months ago.
The article does not put the deaths in the context of “extra” or “excess” deaths over the period or reconcile the number of doses to the number of deaths.
The data shown does lead to the question “how many would have died had there been no C19 injections?”
Here’s a couple of key extracts:
“However, as is shown in the following chart, the vaccinated population as a whole accounted for 95% of all COVID-19 deaths between January and May 2023, while the unvaccinated population accounted for just 5%.
But it’s the fact that these deaths aren’t among the one-dose and two-dose vaccinated population that is truly horrifying. The vast majority are among the 4x vaccinated, with this population accounting for 80% of all COVID-19 deaths, and 83% of all COVID-19 deaths among the vaccinated. (Source).”
How many Brits are “vaccinated” four times?
Official numbers from here (discontinued in March 2023):
Coronavirus (COVID-19) latest insights - Office for National Statistics (ons.gov.uk)
“Among people aged 18 years and over, 75.8% had received at least three COVID-19 vaccinations as of 2 March 2023. Of those who had received three doses and were eligible, 77.7% had continued to their fourth vaccination.
The continuation from third to fourth dose of the COVID-19 vaccine was highest among individuals aged 80 years and over (94.0%) and those aged between 70 and 79 years (91.9%). Younger age groups had lower continuation, with less than half of eligible individuals aged 18 to 29 years (38.6%) and 30 to 39 years (44.1%) receiving their fourth dose.”
So, there is a large discrepancy between the numbers extracted by Expose-news.com and the ONS data - discrepancies of this sort abound in all analyses. There is no “gold standard” that is not rife with anomalies and distortions.
I will end with a couple of paragraphs from the Expose-news.com article:
“What’s extremely concerning about these official figures is that the vaccinated surpass the unvaccinated by far in terms of death in every single age group since July 2021, despite the fact 30% of the population have not even had a COVID-19 injection.
So much so, that there were 965,609 deaths among the vaccinated compared to just 60,903 deaths among the unvaccinated between July 2021 and May 2023. Meaning there was a grand total of 1,026,512 deaths in England during this period and the vaccinated accounted for 94% of them, whereas the unvaccinated accounted for just 6% of them.”
The UK population is around 68 million, so 30% of that is around 20 million.
965,609 deaths amongst 48 million “vaccinated”= a death rate of 20,117 per million.
60,903 deaths amongst 20 million “unvaccinated” = a death rate of 3,045 per million.
Almost seven times higher death rate amongst the “vaccinated”.
I wonder if that will make it into the UK Government’s C19 enquiry. Somehow I very much doubt it.
Onwards!
Please subscribe or donate via Ko-fi – any amount from 3 bucks upwards. Don’t worry and God Bless, if you can’t or don’t want to. Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 Ko-fi donation a week!
I agree the shots are garbage. But analysis need to be kept transparent to avoid misrepresenting data which pharma and the regulators are guilty of.
The demographics of the vaccinated and unvaccinated are not the same - the unvaccinated are younger. The UK has about 68 million people, 30% of that is 20.2 million. If this unvaccinated group had a normal distribution reflective of the whole population it would expect about 8 deaths per 1000 population per year barring any disasters or vaccines. Over two years normal mortality would be about 325,000 deaths. If the unvaccinated 30% of the population only experienced 61,000 deaths, that would be a mortality rate of 1.5 per 1000 population or about 5x below normal morality. A mortality rate of 1.5 / 1000 is the normal mortality rate for the 40-49 year old demographic.
For any of these mortality comparisons to be definitive they have to compare each age cohort vaccinated against unvaccinated per 1000 population.
Let’s keep it real, the true story about the mRNA shots is bad enough, we don’t need to lose credibility misrepresenting the data.
But wait, any minute now. I can see a MORON "scientist" responding with:
"Did these numbers include an evaluation of OTHER variables such as race, income, gender, etc.?"
You see, the trendy thing to do these days, is to argue that UNLESS you "granulated" or "stratified" into a thousands different subsets, to "account for" all OTHER possible variables, (BESIDES vaccination status) then all other possible variables somehow became "confounding variables."
I'm actually engaged in this particular argument with a FREAK who says that a variable is always equivalent to a "confounding variable." He's SERIOUSLY trying to say that all variables ALWAYS confound the variable of interest being examined.
The worst morons on the planet are often PhDs. They've often lost all ability to reason.