A brutal take-down of the UK’s health regulator, MHRA, that can be applied to health regulators globally – “negligent and incompetent”.

What else could they be for approving injections which they had no experience or expertise or qualifications in regulating? IT WAS AN EXPERIMENT

From here:

MHRA: The Big Pharma ‘enabler’ is negligent as well as incompetent - The Conservative Woman

Please read the entire article as it spells out in detail the corruption of the authorisation process from clinical trial to manufacturing of injections (manufactured injections were different to clinical trial injections).

I have a question that may or may not be important. Facts would help! It relates to this paragraph:

“The American Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) emergency use authorisation on December 11, 2020. Three days later Pfizer began smashing the control arm of the clinical trial by unblinding participants and offering the vaccine to those who had received the placebo. ‘By March 2021, 90 per cent of the placebo group had had at least one dose of vaccine. “

And this table from here:

The COVID-19 Inoculations - More Harm Than Good FINAL Video & Print (canadiancovidcarealliance.org)

I have been curious about the numbers of “Related Adverse Events” in the Placebo group. What does “Related” refer to. Why would there be even a single “Related Adverse Event” in the Placebo group?

Now maybe “Related” refers to adverse events following unblinding – and the table showing 1,311 adverse events in the Placebo group – along with 150 severe (life altering) and 116 serious (life threatening) events should be in the BNT162-2b injected group.

The unsafe metrics were already appalling – if this potential is borne out, the metrics become apocalyptic – no possible way any regulator could approve such a “treatment” (“harm-ment”?)

There is a little coverage of another heinous aspect during the clinical trials – Process 2 which ran in parallel to the Phase 3 Clinical Trial but whose results were 2.5 times more harmful than the Phase 3 clinical trials and were intentionally EXCLUDED from all reporting of results.

“Even so, in Pfizer’s six-month report to the FDA the company reported significantly higher rates of adverse events in the former placebo group ‘as expected’ after they were given the actual vaccine.”

Remember the doses actually manufactured were different from the does in the clinical trails. Process 2 was a (small = 260 injected v placebo) a parallel trial.

“.. EMA assessment reveals that the testing of Process 2 batches on Phase 3 volunteers was irrelevant. It states: ‘The first doses from the Process 2 batch were dispensed on 19 October 2020, and the first subjects received dose 2 on 09 November 2020. As the cut-off date for the Interim Analysis (IA) was prior to 09 November 2020, the IA doesn’t include data from subjects dosed with Process 2 material, and the Company does not expect to have Process 2 included in the Final Analysis dataset either.’ 

Remember, Emergency Use Approval was granted on 11 December 2020 by the FDA – this is amore than  full moth after the second dose for Process 2 was administered – all at a time when every other time period was heavily curtailed – so why was this report not discussed at the meeting authorizing the injection?

As it is, the clinical trial period was scheduled to last from 31 July 2020 to 31 January 2021 – a full six months.. It was terminated on 9 November 2020. A two dose regimen in the trial may have been in effect for just 45 days.

Lastly, never forget that people were not considered “vaccinated” until two weeks AFTER the second dose. The doses were administered 21 days apart? Was this also a “case” definition in the clinical trials?

Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | NEJM

“.. we randomly assigned persons 16 years of age or older in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses, 21 days apart, of either placebo or the BNT162b2 vaccine candidate (30 μg per dose). “

Anyway, please read the article re-linked below for ease.

MHRA: The Big Pharma ‘enabler’ is negligent as well as incompetent - The Conservative Woman

The point that health regulators became enablers/marketers of toxic injections is key.

No regulator, anywhere in the world had the expertise, experience or qualifications to approve an experimental mRNA or viral vector injection, let alone reconcile and prove the quality of the manufactured injection against the clinical trail injection.

The “Vaccines” are a failed experiment and the health regulators in every country in the world failed to detect that failure in clinical trials, were prevented from seeing “double jeopardy” harms in “Process 2”, failed to act on 2 month post marketing authorization over the period 10 December 2020 to 28 February 2021, and, perhaps, most egregiously, failed to monitor the quality of billions of batches sent around the world that contained monkey DNA and other contaminants by, at least, sampling random batches and comparing them with “quality” present in clinical trial batches.

Onwards

Please upgrade to paid, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan  Buying just one Ko-Fi a week  for $3 is 50 bucks more than an annual $100 subscription!