Anti-humans continue their insane attacks to reduce the food we grow by pretending they understand and can control the air we breathe

From here:

America Signs Global Climate Agreement to Crack Down on Farming - Slay News

“Democrat President Joe Biden’s administration has signed a global agreement with 12 other nations to crack down on farming to “save the planet” from “climate change.”

“What now?” I hear you say, with an eye-roll.

“The Global Methane Hub announced in a press release that agriculture and environmental ministers and ambassadors from 13 countries, including the U.S., have signed a commitment that pledges to reduce methane emissions in agriculture.”

Other nations signing on include Australia, Germany, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Spain.

Here is a link to the press release by the anti-humans who were not elected to do this, they just “feed at the taxpayers trough” to advance an anti-human agenda:

Major Livestock Producing Countries Commit to Mitigate Methane in Agriculture - Global Methane Hub

“Food systems are responsible for 60% of methane emissions,” said Marcelo Mena, CEO of Global Methane Hub.”

60% of the 0.00018% methane that is in the air. “Making a mountain out of a mole hill” has morphed into “making a Zeppelin out of a termite fart”.

We all know how CO2 emissions have long been targeted as a major contributor to “climate change” and “global warming”. That is based on an assumption that CO2 will increase from the current 400 parts per million to 500 parts per million which will cause a rise in average global temperatures of around 1-2 degrees Centigrade.

We also know that the basis for this rise In temperatures is predicated on a temperature record that began at a 6,000 year low in global temperatures in 1875.

(86) Ice core samples reveal that UN IPCC climate models picked the 8,000 year low of global temperatures on which to base their absurd “anthropogenic global warming” (AGW) cult (substack.com)

How about methane?

From here:

Methane Matters (nasa.gov)

Methane makes up 0.00018% of air, compared to 0.04% for CO2 – that is 1.8 parts per million for CH4, v 400 parts per million for CO2.

“Yet scientists attribute about one-sixth of recent global warming to methane emissions; what methane lacks in volume it makes up for in potency. Over a 20-year period, one ton of methane has a global warming potential that is 84 to 87 times greater than carbon dioxide.”

“Since 2007, methane has been on the rise, and no one is quite sure why. Some scientists think tropical wetlands have gotten a bit wetter and are releasing more gas. Others point to the natural gas fracking boom in North America and its sometimes leaky infrastructure. Others wonder if changes in agriculture may be playing a role.”

“There is no question that methane is doing some very odd and worrying things,” said Euan Nisbet, an atmospheric scientist at Royal Holloway, University of London. The big question is why. Scientists wonder if they will have the right monitoring systems in place to answer that question adequately.”

So, without any adequate information or analysis, politicians and bureaucrats are consuming billions of dollars prevaricating and then inflicting hundreds of billions of dollars over decades on “faux science” – just like they have done for CO2 BS.

We must not forget the war on Nitrogen either.

Dutch farmers could be paid to close their livestock farms under new scheme | Euronews

What next? Reducing Oxygen emissions by shutting down farms – maybe Argon emissions?

The real objective is to reduce CO2 emissions from human beings, by reducing the population of human beings - reducing livestock emissions is a first step.

After all, 8 billion people each exhale 2.3 pounds of CO2 per day. How long before the anti-humans pervert human CO2 exhalation with “climate change” and “global warming”?

Do We Exhale Carbon? (nrdc.org)

“Does the collective exhalation of carbon dioxide from all those people contribute significantly to global warming?

No. Human beings do exhale almost three billion tons of carbon dioxide annually, but the carbon we exhale is the same carbon that was “inhaled” from the atmosphere by the plants we consume.”

Note the faulty conflation of CO2 and “carbon”. They are entirely different from each other. One is a colourless, odourless gas, the other is a solid and manifests as diamonds, graphite or coal. A typical misrepresentation and distortion of science. How can a gas leave a footprint? Similar to the continued use of the term “fossil fuels” to include gases. Fossils are noy gaseous or liquid. They are the imprints of extinct life forms!

“fos·sil

[ˈfɒs(ə)l, ˈfɒsɪl]

NOUN

the remains or impression of a prehistoric plant or animal embedded in rock and preserved in petrified form:”

Onwards!

Please upgrade to paid, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan  - Buying just one Ko-Fi a week  for $3 is 50 bucks more than an annual $100 subscription!