Are the NSA and other 5i’s national security systems already supplying meta (“test”) data from social media sites, telephones, emails and websites to companies contracted by the WHO ?

Edward Snowden fled to Russia after he posted most of the US surveillance systems on to the internet.

Here’s a little background:

BBC News - NSA-GCHQ Snowden leaks: A glossary of the key terms

From Radio to Porn, GCHQ Spies Track Web Users’ Online Identities (theintercept.com)

Just one quote to ram home the point “The paper published the secret court order directing telecommunications company Verizon to hand over all its telephone data to the NSA on an "ongoing daily basis". That report was followed by revelations in both the Washington Post and Guardian that the NSA tapped directly into the servers of nine internet firms, including Facebook, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo, to track online communication in a surveillance programme known as Prism.”

All that was ten years ago and surveillance software capabilities have increased markedly since then.

Suffice to say that 5i’s (US, Canada, UK, Australia and New Zealand track and exchange every form of communication – trillions of pieces – and have the “data mining” expertise to access meta data at the lowest level of telephone conversations, to websites like SubStack and all comments – at will and whenever some operator feels is necessary.

Who knows what agreements have been made with the EU, Japan and elsewhere.

From here: (h/t Emily):

Congress To Investigate WHO Plans To Use "Listening Surveillance Systems" To Identify "Misinformation" (reclaimthenet.org)

The WHO plans to control information that runs counter to the narrative of the quacks it employs and who have no track record of success in any endeavour, publish no detail of projects they run in terms of objectives and outcomes, and have diplomatic immunity from prosecution of any and all harms they inflict. It is seeking a ten fold increase in its budget. Here is an example of its accountability under Ghana.

WHO | Programme Budget Web Portal

Where is the starting point for Ghana, how much was been spent in Ghana on meeting the objective of “One billion More People benefitting from Universal Health Care Coverage”? And so on and so forth – a,, mouth and trousers.

From the ReclaimtheNet article:

“According to documents from the UN agency, PRET aims to “guide countries in pandemic planning” and work to “incorporate the latest tools and approaches for shared learning and collective action established during the COVID-19 pandemic.” The PRET document describes misinformation as a “health threat,” and refers to it as an “infodemic.”

The WHO has adopted a totalitarian stance against freedom of speech. Ig you think pre-Musk censorship was run by left wing radicals or that Biden’s Mistress of Information was bad enough, think about it being rolled out globally by people with IQ’s even lower than their shoe sizes.

Try not to shudder when you view this atrocity hire of Biden’s. Nina Jankowicz - Mary Poppins (Disinformation Song) - YouTube

Here’s more:

“The infodemic can directly impact health, hamper the implementation of public health countermeasures and undermine trust and social cohesiveness,” the document states.”

Now, what this means is that the banning of IVM and HCQ protocols because they would negate the need for “vaccines” would be “de rigeur” – no content allowed on the internet and phone calls monitored at will from and between anyone regarded as a threat – just by clicking a few keys. “Show me the man and I will show you the crime” as Andrey Vyshinsky famously said (he was not a libertarian!).

Just think – if someone discovered salt or sodium chlorate was a cure for long covid and wanted to get the word out – and that flew in the face of a multi-billion dollar supply chain (mis)constructed by the WHO – the word could be censored and the miscreant with the cure “tipped off” to law enforcement.

The WHO is hardly likely to publicise the cure if it has spent billions of dollars and harnessed tens of millions of staff resources. We have damning evidence that the WHO is an enabler of harms and big pharma still fresh in our minds.

Here’s where it ties back to the imposition of a totalitarian global state. The WHO has zero competence in running global health care via technology. If it can’t be programmed by a high school student in, say, Kenya, on a spreadsheet, the WHO can’t do it. So, who will the WHO be using when it says this?

“Establish and invest in resources for social listening surveillance systems and capacities to identify concerns as well as rumors and misinformation,” .. “To build trust, it’s important to be responsive to needs and concerns, to relay timely information, and to train leaders and HCWs in risk communications principles and encourage their application.. Communication should be tailored to the community of interest, focusing on and prioritizing vulnerable groups.”

And how about this little nugget:

“New tools and approaches for social listening have been developed using new technologies such as artificial intelligence to listen to population concerns on social media (such as the Platform EARS developed by WHO).”

Platform EARS – straight from the “in your face - what you gonna do about it?” and “you cannot make this shit up” files.

Of course, this means that all VPN’s will have to be breached – no privacy is allowed on any device, else the entire surveillance model is rendered useless.

Check this out from just 16 months ago:

Deutsche Telekom to build global COVID vaccine verification app for WHO | Reuters

“BERLIN, Feb 23 (Reuters) - The World Health Organization has signed a contract with Deutsche Telekom (DTEGn.DE) subsidiary T-Systems to build a software solution for global electronic verification of coronavirus vaccination certificates, the telecoms company said.”

That’s just the “digital passport” component.

How hard would it be to interface digital communications from Canadian companies like these:

The digital disruptors changing health care in Canada | PwC Canada

And this from two years ago: Implementing digital passports for SARS-CoV-2 (cmaj.ca)

I am sure there are lots more companies around the world that would be only too happy to provide support for the global totalitarian state envisaged by the corrupt, anti-humans at the WHO.

All that DNA data collected by companies around the world will be harvested by national security agencies and handed over to the WHO. The WHO wil employ the “morons of Twitter” types to police and censor people on a whim with no chance of appeal.

Remember people are entitled to know what personal information companies are storing  and what use is made of it. The PRET document states that all private information belongs to the WHO, and so does all transmitted and received on every device via every medium for all 8 billion people on the planet.

Good luck with VPN’s and security systems that monitor “system attacks” from external parties. Will they have to allow the WHO inside their fire-walls – all those banks and financial companies, for example? Healthcare companies, life insurance? Sick records at employers? Emergency or elective hospital admissions data? Yeah – all pf that and more.

Onwards!

Please upgrade to paid, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan  - Buying just one Ko-Fi a week  for $3 is 50 bucks more than an annual $100 subscription!