Back in Time - Reconciling VAERS reporting for the three months ending 28 February 2021 and the Pfizer Post Marketing Surveillance report submitted to the FDA
First-off, I want to give a shout out to WelcomeTheEagle88. He has a SubStack, but no posts as yet. I hope he shows off the fantastic work he has done here in at least one article!:
All the buttons are clickable, so you can view the data through many lenses.
Another thought before proceeding.
The vast majority of US medics and relevant personnel were unaware that VAERS even existed prior to C19 injections. The chances that anyone outside the US knowing about VAERS is going to be zero. This means that the Under-Reporting Factor prior to 2021 for vaccines is going to be in the hundreds for adverse events developing over the short, medium and long term (Lazarus Report calculated a little more than 100) – BUT the under-reporting factor for non-US adverse events is likely to be in the thousands, if not higher, especially for long term adverse event side effects. Right now, there is a 50% split between reports of death between the US and non-US on the VAERS.
Ok, another great article was posted yesterday about the “Banality of VAERS”.
The Banality of VAERS - by Josh Guetzkow (substack.com)
Pfizer/BioNTech was approved by FDA for Emergency Use on 11 December 2020, Moderna a week later.
General Dynamics was awarded a multi-million dollar contract to process adverse events on to VAERS, presumably because it has similar experience in battlefield situations.
Focussing on the number of “INCOMING!!!!” events reported to VAERS by month over the time since EUA and the first few months of 2021 covered by the Post Marketing Authorization Surveillance report for Pfizer (I can’t locate the surveillance reports for Moderna, JnJ or any others) by the sub-contractor, General Dynamics – reported battlefield casualty style, we have this:
15 January 2021 report covering December 2020 – 19,046 “incoming”, +Web Reports 11,266
15 February 2021 report covering January 2021 – 26,067 “incoming” +Web Reports received 54,684
15 March 2021 report, covering February 2021 – 24,357 “incoming” + Web Reports received 167,696
So, in total over the t(short) three months – 11 December 2020 to 28 February 2021:
69,470 “incoming” and 233,646 web reports. No detailed breakdown of deaths/events.
How does that compare to VAERSanaysis.info records?
From here: VAERS Summary for COVID-19 Vaccines through 3/10/2023 – VAERS Analysis
We have this chart for the first three months of the vaxx roll-out:
As at February 2021, there were 304,438 adverse events.
Assuming I have extracted the numbers correctly, the reports represented by VAERSAnalysis.info and General Dynamics are, almost, exactly the same.
So, if the data reconciles, what is the problem? Well it relates to:
· the number of reports that General Dynamics DID NOT PROCESS onto VAERS (could be double or triple what they actually processed
· the reconciliation of VAERS reports with the sum of ALL Post-Marketing Authorization Surveillance reports sent of VAERS by big pharma, especially Pfizer’s
· the allocation of adverse events back to the time period the adverse events actually occurred – as per the work done by WelcomeTheEagle88. There is, of course the URF that General Dynamics has no control over.
Plus there is this from the “Banality of VAERS” article, note this:
“Many reports to VAERS come from the manufacturers who are required to report AEs reported to them to VAERS, many of which come from foreign countries. Here they decided to accept the MedDRA coding of reports performed by the manufacturers instead of coding them themselves. So basically letting Pfizer and Moderna and Johnson & Johnson decide how to categorize the AE reports they were receiving:”
Poacher turned game-keeper? Pfizer have been submitting fraudulent reports for decades. So have the other pharma companies – billions of dollars of fines paid for by the company, yet ZERO prosecution and imprisonment of INDIVIUALS responsible for conducting the many frauds.
Lastly, here is a reminder of the adverse events reported by Pfizer to the FDA in its Post Marketing Surveillance report here:
reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf (phmpt.org)
Pfizer showed 42,086 adverse events in its surveillance report to 28 February 2021.
Compare this to 304,438 adverse events reported to VAERS.
My guesstimate is that Pfizer/BioNTech had a market share of around 90% of injections, LHS = US doses, RHS = EU doses – these two probably made up at least 90% of injections required by Federal law to be reported into VAERS.
Note that in its surveillance report, Pfizer stated it had “shipped” 126.2 million doses. However, according to OurWorldinData, only 67.7 million doses were actually administered – thus reducing the harm per dose by a factor of almost 2.
Note the considerably lower number of Moderna injections administered in the EU v the US. Moderna matched Pfizer in the US, but was only 4% of Pfizer in the EU.
If I am correct, (WelcomeTheEagle88 probably has this data on his website) that Pfizer represents 90% of injections and, first order estimation, 90% of adverse events, then the number of adverse events that Pfizer SHOULD HAVE presented in its surveillance report is 90% of 304,438 VAERS adverse events reports.
That is around 275,000 and not the 42,000 it reported to the FDA – a multiple of around 6 times under-reported.
Lastly, and hopefully not confusingly, there is the systemic issue of under-reporting to VAERS historically and for that 3 month period.
If a URF of 40 is applied to the 275,000 – the 304,438 adverse events in total from around the world in to VAERS is probably 11 million compared to the 109 million doses administered in the US and EU.
PS: From page 11 here:
The COVID-19 Inoculations - More Harm Than Good FINAL Video & Print (canadiancovidcarealliance.org)
20 people died in the injected group v 14 in the placebo group.
There were around 21,900 in each of the injected group and placebo groups.
There were 5,241 adverse events in the injected group = 24% - let’s leave aside how there could possibly be any adverse events in the placebo group.
Severe (life changing events were around 1% and Serious (life threatening events) were 0.6%.
This for a “show trial” that was supposed to last 6 months – from 31 July 2020 to 31 January 2021, but ws unblinded by early November 2020.
Onwards!
Please subscribe, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan
Excelsior!