Bradford-Hill Criteria – a scientific method that exposes the lethal, unsafe and ineffective C19 mRNA injections
In 1965, more than 57 years ago, Bradford-Hill set down nine criteria to determine the strength of an association between a disease and its supposed causative agent. They form the basis of modern medical and dental epidemiological research.
The Bradford Hill Criteria (changingminds.org)
These criteria also describe the minimal conditions establishing cause and effect in medical diagnosis.
These are the nine Bradford Hill criteria
1. Strength of association - the stronger the association, the more likely it is that the relation is causal.
2. Temporal relationship - exposure always precedes the outcome.
3. Consistency - results are replicated with different people under different circumstances and with different measurement instruments.
4. Theoretical plausibility - rational and theoretical basis for such a conclusion
5. Coherence - association should be compatible with existing theory, hypotheses, and knowledge
6. Specificity - the effect has only one cause
7. Dose response relationship - increasing amount of exposure increases the risk
8. Experimental evidence - related research that is based on experiments will make a causal inference more plausible
9. Analogy - commonly accepted phenomenon in one area can be applied to another area.
Just a few of these criteria are sufficient to prove cause and effect.
Applying any of these criteria to the C19 mRNA injections indicates that the injections fail.
There is a strong association of excess all-cause mortality with the roll-out of the injections in every country in the world.
People die and are injured in huge numbers, within minutes, days, weeks, months or even years of the injections, people who would reasonably be expected to live unhurt, without having taken the injection.
These results are replicated in all countries that maintain any kind of adverse event reporting system and within countries that have more than one such adverse event reporting system.
The theory that C19 mRNA injections cause deaths and harms is entirely plausible and rational.
Vaccine harms are known and have been for decades. The degree of harms for C19 mRNA injections is multiples that of traditional vaccines. The argument against the C19 mRNA injections is coherent, logical and apparent to those with knowledge and experience.
There is only one rational cause for the massive rises in excess mortality – the C19 mRNA injections. No other cause has been suggested or proven to exist.
It is evident that the more C19 mRNA injections that are taken, the greater the risk of death and (largely permanent) injury.
The Phase 3 clinical trials demonstrated a higher rate of adverse events and deaths from the C19 mRNA injections, as did the high incidence of fatalities and adverse events from the post marketing authorization reports, as have countless other research papers from all over the world.
As far as an analogy is concerned, there will be better, but this is akin to injecting snake venom directly, to prevent snake bite. Anti-venom is extracted from an animal that has built up immunity over a long period of time to continual injections of snake venom. C19 mRNA injections insert instructions to create the toxic spike protein (snake venom) directly, along with poisoning from the toxic lipid nano-particle and the PEG coating.
With these jokers you need to apply the Bradford-Hill criteria to diagnose all those involved as insane also using this perspective!
https://neuro.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/jnp.13.3.318
Onwards!
I drink a lot of coffee – if you like my “stuff” but don’t want to pay for a subscription you can buy me a cup to show (any!) appreciation here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan
In the world of the Progressives and globalists such math concepts would be labeled dangerous and forbidden PERIOD. You would be declared a domestic terrorist for such wanton disregard of the The States’ desire to control and manipulate the plebs/minions/slaves who pay taxes and are expected to remain silent and “can I have another”(Animal House reminder). Only high level Party faithful would even be allowed to see and hear such concepts...and only in regards to increasing control of the population.
If you got this information from Dr Cambell’s YouTube post of a few days ago on this very same subject, give him credit.