C19 injections - Informed consent v government mandated compulsion in the doctor/patient relationship

A tale of two states - one uses informed consent between doctor and patient- the other government mandated treatment

Here is the video:

mRNA Vaccines and Deaths - Florida Recommends Against mRNA Vaccines in 18-39 Males - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlIys3nj4s8

I find Drbeen’s podcasts to be amongst the most expert, relevant and balanced of all those on the topics he covers.

He does a quick summary of the basis for Florida’s recommendation AGAINST MRNA injections for 18-39 year olds (that extends the recommendation to all males under 40). Extra (RELATIVE, not ABSOLUTE) cardiac risk = 84%

The Florida report also indicates a heightened cardiac risk for males over 60 from MRNA injections, that is not suffered by women over 60 (no increased cardiac risk for women over 60) from MRNA.

Drbeen also highlighted that non-MRNA (vector) vaccines are not good for women, but work better that MRNA vaccines for men. (Extra 10% risk).

The key point made by Drbeen is that he was thrilled that the Florida advice paper stated that informed consent within a discussion of all benefits and risk between the doctor and patient is paramount - whereas in California, the recently passed legislation stated that ONLY whatever happens to pass for the entire population’s consensus view of treatment (regardless of any patients unique circumstances like age, weight, general health, other medications, allergies, risk tolerances etc).

Interestingly the 28 day study for adverse events after two doses did NOT find an increase in overall population excess death - this can be viewed in the context of excess deaths centring around 20% for many European countries. Other demographics are not indicated to have higher risks.

California Bill l2098 here

Bill Text - AB-2098 Physicians and surgeons: unprofessional conduct. (ca.gov)

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2098

Florida bulletin here:

State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo Issues New mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Guidance (govdelivery.com)

https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/FLDOH/bulletins/3312697

Based on this study:

20221007-guidance-mrna-covid19-vaccines-analysis.pdf (floridahealthcovid19.gov)

https://floridahealthcovid19.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/20221007-guidance-mrna-covid19-vaccines-analysis.pdf?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery

Some commentary here:

Florida Surgeon General Against mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines for Males Aged 18–39 – Virutron

https://virutron.com/florida-surgeon-general-against-mrna-covid-19-vaccines-for-males-aged-18-39/

So, a heightened mortality risk in one category (under 39 year old males) with no increase in overall mortality risk, implies that there must be REDUCED risk in other categories. Interesting! This suggests that, if efficacy can be proven, that safety is not an issue across all demographics.

Here are some data tables grabbed from the Drbeen podcast. He discusses significance of the results for the different demographics at the 20:25 minute mark.

The video is well worth a watch and then watch this space!