From here:
TWITTER CAUGHT IN SHOCKING CENSORSHIP! Check Out How Twitter Hides TGP and the Truth from the American Public (thegatewaypundit.com)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/twitter-caught-shocking-censorship-check-twitter-hides-tgp-truth-american-public/
“The Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft formally joined the lawsuit filed in May by the states of Missouri and Louisiana against ALL of the MAJOR GOVERNMENT PLAYERS in Big Tech Censorship, including Joe Biden, Jen Psaki, Anthony Fauci, the CDC, the NIH, the Department of Homeland Security, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, and many others.
The Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft joined the lawsuit along with the states of Missouri and Louisiana, Dr. Martin Kulldorff of Harvard University’s Department of Medicine, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford University, medical ethicist Dr. Aaron Kheriaty, and Jill Hines, the Co-Director of Health Freedom Louisiana.”
It is my belief that the same has happened to me. I started this substack newsletter a month ago. I am posting artciles to my 600 odd contacts on LinkedIn. I was succesful at first, then received a warning on one artcile that censorship by social media and misinformation by the MSM was killing people. Now I get zero hits from LinkedIn contacts.
The same applies to twitter. I thought it would be a good idea to tweet posts to the twitter accounts of opinion leaders like Tucker Carlson, Joe Rogan and Russell Brand plus a few news stations like GBNews and SkyNewsAustralia.
One of these tweets, “We are all “vaccinated” - whether we like it or not” received around 4,000 views, 75% sourced from twitter. Since then, Nothing.
Of course my content could be unappealing and regarded as tripe. But, somehow out of millions of followers on these opinion leaders twitter accounts, combined with the “success” of a single tweet using the described method, there must be thousands of people that are interested in my personal take.
Anyway, perhaps there is a way to grow substack and share our views. Substack has a million paid subscribers and is read millions of times a week. My writing and qualifications are not of a standard that merits payment, but I believe my opinions and those of others can act as a catalyst, or spark, for those of better quality to help encourage innovation and progress for all.
What to do? Well, a network of a million paid subscribers - although some in the same “bubble”, likely has 600 contacts each, maybe 300 unconnected. So, what formula would avoid bugging the hell out of the substack base with what would be “spam” but would make the best use of a substack equivalent of “retweets” and “LinkedIn contacts or Facebook “Groups”.
Is there a way to correlate the contact databases so that these can be “imported” into substack, rather than having to post to these bestial social media paltforms that censor stories that kill not just ideas and thoughts, but also people by their suppression of such “free speech”.
Thoughts welcome!
https://pierrekory.substack.com/p/the-criminal-censorship-of-ivermectins
My answer is for the substack website to model iself on sites like Citizen Free Press, Zero Hedge or the Epoch Times and publish artciles by contributors with a comment section, so we can have a much more connected substack community.