Changes to IHR 2005 - A two hour debate (supposed to be 3) in a side chamber 100 yards from the Houses of Parliament main debating chamber
Seven MP’s and four “moderator/speakers”.
Remember, there was no pandemic, it was an entirely fabricated psy-op, using a US DoD developed bioweapon, with deaths leaping and staying high because of government interventions following WHO instructions as per the existing IHR 2005 regulations.
If I hear “no-one I safe, until everyone is safe” one more time,,, we now also have “nothing is agreed until everything is agreed” as far as the amendments are concerned.
Remember, these ARE NOT AMENDMENTS – they are a complete rewriting of the regulations and the introduction of an entirely new pandemic non-treaty that removes all sovereignty from INDIVUDALS and GOVERNMENTS!
All the treatments – from lockdowns to masking to Midazolam and morphine to injections with toxic experimental injections instead of using know prophylactics and cures (like IVM and HCQ) were ALL deadly.
Response FAIL – deadly fail on WHO instructions.
From here:
Timed to start with the Labour opposition spokeswoman – who fully endorses all amendments and thinks there is a “climate crisis” – followed by the official government response from the incumbent Health Minister – who used “National Interest” liberally throughout his speech.
Somehow or other, all references to failed pandemic responses to HIV-AIDS, pneumonia and malaria by the WHO are skated over – so are the leading causes of death in the western world – cancer and heart disease that one would think would be Public Health Emergencies,
Note also the complete and utter lack of acknowledgement that C19 mRNA injections that have killed tens of millions of people over the last 3 years and given hundreds of millions of people life altering and life threatening conditions is not even discussed.
It would have been nice if one of the MP’s - of the handful that were present – had simply asked the question “would the changes to the IHR 2005 and the new Pandemic non-Treaty be imposed harder with greater censorship than we have just had?”
The answer is of course they would. Except that people would be forcibly removed from their homes and placed into quarantine camps this time – even more human experimentation would be undertaken ,”one size fits all” (in true fascist/communist style) would be imposed and informed consent would be out the window on a permanent basis.
Jackboot health.
Onwards!
Please subscribe or donate via Ko-fi – any amount from 3 bucks upwards. Don’t worry and God Bless, if you can’t or don’t want to. Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 Ko-fi donation a week!
Albert Pike's heros, just playing their parts. Only having actually seen a couple of these debates by our so called representatives, I can clearly see the outcome is already in motion as, in this example, the deadline was already passed (no-one notice?). It's a big club and we ain't in it!