Covid19 remedies - the legal ones
and quality control ones too!
Pandemic Remedies – the Legal and Quality Kind
First, a reminder of what is at stake. Prior to the roll-out of 12.5 billion doses globally, starting in mid-December 2020, there had been 70 million “cases” and 1.7 million deaths with CoVID-19 present. The “cases” represented less than 1% (one in one hundred) of the global population of around 7.8 billion and deaths were around 0.02% (2 in 10,000) of the global population BEFORE the injections were available. The clinical trials claimed that the less than 1% global population “case” rate would be reduced by around 90%. There have now been 604 million cases and 6.5 million deaths. So, the result of those 12.5 billion doses reducing “cases” by 90%, “cases” have increased by over 8 times. Deaths with CoVID-19 present, have increased by a factor of 4. Using EUDRA and VAERS datra and an under-reporting factor of 40, there have been almost 2 billion “vaccine” injuries and 20 million “vaccine” deaths SO FAR.
To the neutral and objective observer, the policy of injecting a substance that causes the immune system to manufacture the very viral spike protein that causes the disease has failed. Not only failed but is more lethal than the disease AND the global roll-out of the injections is a deadly, artificial and manufactured pandemic in its own right.
There has been a seismic political shift in the last few decades, culminating and epitomized by the slogan “Build Back Better”. This necessitates throwing out the accumulated and evolved wisdom of thousands of the brightest minds over the last century and codified into laws and regulations that benefit humans – and replacing that wisdom, knowledge and quality with “faux science” (not just “fauci science” sponsored megalomaniacs and narcissistic billionaire sponsorship of pet projects. Instead, this QUALITY has been replaced by this “faux science” of narratives and computer models that cannot encapsulate relevant variables and instead cherry pick manipulated data in order to achieve political objectives.
I will leave consideration of the cost of the abandonment of long established, pre-CoVID-19, pandemic response guidelines and the redefinition of terms like “public health emergency of international concern” (PHEIC, pronounced “fake”), “vaccines” to include “therapies”, the abandonment of clinical control trial standards for the sake of “warp speed” injections of toxins that threaten entire species – including humans – and the complete opacity of start and end points for determining PHEIC’s, transparent and available benchmarking of treatments - to another time.
Suffice to say, the grounding in ,and continual striving for, the three pillars of life (virtue, excellence and transparency) have been abandoned in order to pursue the inevitable catastrophic outcomes (ignorance, violence, war, disease, starvation and drought) of “Build Back Better” via Green New Deals and Universal Basic Income plans.
Here, I will reference a few of the legion of legal proceedings underway and sone evidence of malpractice and fraud.
First, here is a case brought that resulted in the UK abandoning all CoVID-19 measures. All of them.
UK ICC Complaint – Hannah Rose Law
All Commonwealth countries like Canada, Australia and New Zealand plus all other countries that have based their legal systems on those of the UK could feasibly file similar proceedings.
Here is another making its way through the courts in the US
Dr. David Martin’s Lawsuit Against Biden: The COVID Injection is a Bioweapon | UncoverDC
Here is an affidavit for air force pilots
Here is a whistleblower case where Pfizer’s defence is “the government told me to do it”:
Here is evidence of pre-meditated fraud and malpractice during clinical trails:
The COVID-19 Inoculations - More Harm Than Good FINAL Video & Print - MoreHarm.pdf | DocDroid
There is a lot of attention to the tens of thousands of post-authorization marketing documents being released for public scrutiny that cover the (short) three month period to 28 February 2021. A focus is evolving around the impact on pregnancies, organ damage and other serious adverse events captured in Table 1 here. (note that Pfizer references doses SHIPPED of 126 million not the 67 million doses ADMINISTERED of around half that number).
reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf (phmpt.org)
A lot of water has flowed under the bridge since that 3-month reporting period expired 18 months ago. All that can be said about the relevance of that 3-month period is that it SHOULD have resulted in a stopping condition for the roll-out of injections. After all, 42,086 adverse events, with 1,226 deaths and 9,400 “Unknown” outcomes from 29 million EU doses plus 38 million US doses (very few doses elsewhere) from 67 million doses. Note that, had attention been paid to the under-reporting factor of 40 for adverse event reporting systems, not only would “red flags” have been raised, but emergency klaxons would have been sounded around the world. There could have been 1.6 million adverse events and 48,000 deaths from those 67 million injections.
COVID-19 vaccine doses administered by manufacturer, European Union (ourworldindata.org)
COVID-19 vaccine doses administered by manufacturer, United States (ourworldindata.org)
As an aside, I wonder if, had diagnosis protocols of “dead with CoVID19 present” been applied to deaths historically, how many deaths in the last 50 years could have been designated as “deaths with “old flu” present”? I suspect more than 90% - which implies that “old flu” could have been defined as a global pandemic every year over the last 50 years had the FDA/CDC/MHRA/WHO etc, acted the same way in categorizing deaths as ey had thwith the CoVID-19 pandemic.
Having dived into a few contextual rabbit holes here is another legal “angle”.
Let’s start with this from here: How Bad is my Batch ? – this is an excellent site that provides insights across and within countries for a host of metrics, not just lots or batches of doses.
The data was compiled to 14 January 2022, so it is a little stale.
“Safety Signal
Some states, in particular Kentucky, Montana, Alaska, Tennessee, North Dakota and South Dakota are experiencing 4 x, 5 x, 6 x or even 11 x the number of deaths per 100,000 vaccinated compared to other states. Such a situation should be raising a safety signal, and requires investigation. The higher death rate in these states following vaccination suggests that they may be receiving more toxic batches, or being administered to more vulnerable people.”
These lots may or may not have been manufactured in the US. They could have been sourced from any of the sites used globally by the manufacturers.
An aside, this article suggests that the poor quality batches could have been distributed maliciously.
A regulator is required by law to be aware of, and report on, these numbers in order to fulfil a key function – quality control.
In the US, this quality control is captured by laws like these:
Definition: device from 21 USC § 321(h)(1) | LII / Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu)
Here is are the section hedings from Code 351
“A drug or device shall be deemed to be adulterated—
(a)Poisonous, insanitary, etc., ingredients; adequate controls in manufacture
(b)Strength, quality, or purity differing from official compendium
(c)Misrepresentation of strength, etc., where drug is unrecognized in compendium
(d)Mixture with or substitution of another substance
(e)Devices not in conformity with performance standards
(f)Certain class III devices
(g)Banned devices
(h)Manufacture, packing, storage, or installation of device not in conformity with applicable requirements or conditions
(i)Failure to comply with requirements under which device was exempted for investigational use
(j)Delayed, denied, or limited inspection; refusal to permit entry or inspection
There is much verbiage below each of these section headers, each of which must be monitored by the regulator. Evidence of such monitoring and quality assurance? Well, the How Bad is my Batch ? website provides a wealth of evidence that this is not the case.
Now the next one that applies to Class 2 devices and some Class 3:
(a)Reasonable assurance of safe and effective performance; periodic evaluation
(b)Establishment of a standard
(c)Recognition of standard
(d)Pilot accreditation scheme for conformity assessment
Again, there is a lot more detail within each of these section headings that compel the Health Secretary to complete a performance assessment and publish reports on the Federal Register. I have not looked for such reports, but the absence of any reference to such reports leads me to believe that there are none of any consequence.
But wait, I hear you ask. What is a “device”. From here:
Definition: device from 21 USC § 321(h)(1) | LII / Legal Information Institute (cornell.edu)
(1) The term “device” (except when used in paragraph (n) of this section and in sections 331(i) , 343(f) , 352(c) , and 362(c) of this title ) means an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or other similar or related article, including any component, part, or accessory, which is— (A) recognized in the official National Formulary, or the United States Pharmacopeia, or any supplement to them, (B) intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or other animals, or (C) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals, and which does not achieve its primary intended purposes through chemical action within or on the body of man or other animals and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of its primary intended purposes. The term “device” does not include software functions excluded pursuant to section 360j( o ) of this title.”
So, what is a Class 2 Device? From here:
Class II Device Definition | Arena (arenasolutions.com)
Examples include powered wheelchairs, pregnancy test kits, catheters, blood pressure cuffs and blood transfusion kits.
And a Class 3 device? From here:
What are Class 3 Medical Devices? - Grants for Medical
Examples include breast implants, defibrillators, pacemakers, Cochlear implants, high-frequency ventilators, fetal blood sampling monitors, implanted prosthetics.
I am sure you can determine which of test kits, injections, masks, etc are assigned to which Class of device.
Let’s refer back to the whistleblower at the Pfizer/BioNTech clinical trial supervised by Ventavia.
The article states this “After she was fired, she gave The BMJ a cache of internal company documents, photos and recordings highlighting the alleged wrongdoing by Ventavia. The documents she provided contained evidence of falsified data, blind trial failures and wareness on the part of at least one Ventavia executive that members of the company’s staff were “falsifying data.” Jackson’s documents also provided evidence of administrators who had “no training” or medical certifications, or who provided “very little oversight” during the trials.”
What are the chances that the facilities administering the real world injections employed the same, better or worse quality standards than the specialist company, Ventavia, during clinical trials it supervised of a few thousand out of the 44,000 in the Pfizer clinical trials? I would say there would be a tendency to be worse for the multiples greater per facility providing injections for the multiples more than the few thousand administered and monitored by the specialist company, Ventavia.
Okay, that’s enough to be going on with. I sign off with a Rolling Stones song that contains the lyrics “Children, it’s just a shot away”, a seminal speech by a holocaust survivor that makes a direct comparison between the Nazi regime of WWII and present day global health regulations and a table from the US Society of Actuaries.
Onwards!
The Rolling Stones - Gimme Shelter (Official Lyric Video) - YouTube
Vera Sharav - Holocaust survivor - by Peter Halligan (substack.com)
https://www.brighteon.com/09548f67-95be-442b-9ace-42c4462bf6ae
https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/criminal-prosecutions-begin-for-remdesivir