Debunking the assumptions of the UN-IPCC climate models – ignorant politicians believe that there is a “climate crisis” requiring trillions of dollars we are all expected to pay for

Nobody knowingly votes for "stupid" that lowers their living standards

“The impact of doubling the CO2 in the atmosphere from 405 parts per million to 820 parts per million IS ZERO.”

The burden of the “net zero” policy insanity falls upon those least able to pay for it – the poor, the elderly and the infirm. The narrative of climate freaks has shifted to “energy security” because their case for “greenhouse gases” has collapsed. 0.04% pf CO2 cannot possibly dominate the other 99.96% of the atmosphere, to raise global temperatures to “global boiling” levels. Neither can 0,00016% of methane or 0,0000333% of nitrous oxide, The case is risible,

Here is a link to a 65-mineut video critique of the UN IPCC’s assumptions used in their climate models.

Paul Linsay: An Analysis of Climate Model Assumptions | Tom Nelson Pod #257

Climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns. Human activities have been the main driver of climate change, primarily due to the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas.

Paul Linsay: An Analysis of Climate Model Assumptions | Tom Nelson Pod #257

00:00 Introduction to CO2 and Climate Impact

00:13 Guest Introduction: Paul Linsay's Academic Journey 04:18 Transition to Climate Science

05:26 Critique of Climate Models

06:19 Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos Theory

12:31 Climate Model Assumptions and Predictions

13:38 Parameterization in Climate Models

28:22 Blackbody Earth and Atmospheric Heating

35:29 Surface Heating and Cooling Dynamics

36:13 Isothermal Atmosphere and Greenhouse Gases

37:23 Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Effects

38:57 Energy Calculations and Molecular Heat

42:25 Climate Models and Radiation

49:24 Convection and Historical Perspectives

55:15 Summary and Final Thoughts

56:58 Q&A and Closing Remarks

Paul’s paper and a podcast transcript are published here:

https://tomn.substack.com/p/podcast-

“

As you listen to the video, imagine just how much knowledge that politicians DO NOT HAVE about what he is discussing. Politicians are neither scientists (or medics) and yet they spend our money as if they do have all the knowledge in the world.

Hopeless!

Here is an extract from Brave AI that provides the bias that indicates the mainstream narrative:

“Tom Nelson has conducted extensive analysis of climate model assumptions, often challenging mainstream views. In one of his episodes, he discusses the work of Paul Linsay, a physicist with a background in nonlinear dynamics and chaos theory. Linsay critiques climate models, pointing out their assumptions and predictions, and delves into topics such as blackbody radiation, atmospheric heating, and the role of greenhouse gases.

Nelson’s podcast series includes discussions with various experts who share similar skepticism towards the mainstream climate change narrative. For instance, Frank Lasee, author of “Climate and Energy Lies: Expensive, Dangerous, and Destructive,” presents compelling evidence against climate change myths and argues for the benefits of increased CO2 levels.

Additionally, Nelson has hosted discussions with other notable figures like Richard Lindzen, Will Happer, and Marc Morano, who also provide in-depth analyses of climate models and their assumptions. These discussions often highlight the complexities of climate science and the importance of considering alternative viewpoints.”

Onwards!

Please subscribe (paid, preferably! or unpaid) or donate via ko-fi. Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan An annual subscription of 100 bucks is less than 30 cents a day and is one third less than a $3 ko-fi donation a week! Please post on your “X” (Twitter) or Facebook feeds!