Denis Rancourt and his team show that the Great Barrington Declaration has a fundamental flaw – the C19 injections disproportionately impact the elderly and infirm – giving C19 injections is WRONG
It always struck me as odd that injecting instructions to make a toxic spike protein someone with a weakened immune system (or directly injecting the toxic spike protein) would somehow generate an immune response from that weakened immune system – I saw no evidence that it was some sort of “miracle immune system creator”.
From the 12 minute video here:
“VIDEO CLIP - Dr.Denis Rancourt PhD interviewed by Bright Light News regarding their new paper documenting COVID-19 Vaccine Toxicity (Romania, Nov.19, 2023)”
The transcript is of much higher quality than YouTube, so I show it all below. Spare a thought for the elderly in Rumania. The dose lethality is one death per 5-10 doses for the over 80;s. I think that Rumania forced anyone with a positive RT-PCR test to go into hospitals.
I also believe that the horrific treatment protocols in the US and UK, combined with the proportionate higher use of especially toxic Oxford/AstraZeneca injection may lead to an even higher global estimate – but no more “steenking vaccines” are being administered so a reduction (hopefully) in excess deaths.
Note the important distinction that the injections do not directly cause death, they allow other co-morbidities to increase their lethality. Every 4-5 years of age the lethality doubles.
“Transcript
0:00
Good day ladies and gentlemen, we're here at International Crisis Summit number four here in Romania.
0:04
It's November the 19th and an honor to be here with Dr. Denis Rancourt, Dr. Marine Baudin and Dr. Jeremy Mercier.
0:11
They have written a stunning paper that the world should know about that says that the COVID-19 mRNA genetic injections have killed 17 million people.
0:22
Absolutely stunning.
0:23
Can you please tell us more about the paper?
0:25
That's the global number.
0:27
We studied many countries in Latin America and in the equatorial region.
0:32
So we have a representative sample of the world, we believe.
0:36
Many injections.
0:37
It's what?
0:37
It's 10% of the world population.
0:41
9% of injections or the other way around.
0:42
So the number we extract from our analysis allows us, we calculate the toxicity of the vaccine for all ages.
0:51
and the number allows us given the number of doses that have been given worldwide to conclude that 17 million people would have been killed by this vaccine.
0:59
And what I would like to add it's that the data we're working with is all cause mortality so it's not nothing related to COVID mortality or anything else it's like you just count death so it's zero one there is no bias in attributing any cause or something.
1:16
Yeah, so this idea of working on an unbiased data is very important because most people are working on COVID death, which means nothing, basically.
1:27
And we wanted to remove any bias so that we have solid data and analysis that really can be extrapolated to the whole world because we have data on countries and on very, very... Four continents.
1:41
Four continents as well.
1:42
So it's a very solid data.
1:44
And it is a data that you can have by function of time, so it could be by day, by week, by month, by a function of characteristic of the individuals like the sex, the age, and other characteristics, and by jurisdictions as well, so it's very powerful.
2:00
But and having it by time like by week or by month and by age group means that you can actually see when there's a rollout of a booster for example which happens very quickly in time for a given age group you can actually see immediately following it a maximum in the all-cause mortality.
2:16
So an excess mortality actual peak that's temporally associated with that rollout.
2:22
We see that repeatedly for each rollout
2:25
consistently across all countries.
2:27
All the countries that have sufficient data where you're able to look at it and you have both the vaccine data and the mortality data, this is what we see.
2:42
And we can quantify it, therefore.
2:44
And so we can quantify the toxicity of the vaccine, the risk of dying per injection.
2:50
And what's really interesting, it's not cherry-picking, choosing those countries.
2:54
It's very important to understand that when you look at all-cause mortality, you see that deaths are increasing in the winter and decreasing in the summer.
3:04
And it's the opposite in the southern hemisphere.
3:07
Their summer is our winter.
3:09
So in the summer, you should have low death.
3:11
But during the COVID vaccine campaign suddenly you see spikes in mortality right after vaccine campaigns and it's very clear because it's in the summer where you should see a low death period.
3:24
So it's incredible to see such a dramatic correlation between vaccination campaigns and spike death.
3:33
Especially in the boosters, like for the southern hemispheres, you have a peak, you know, across the boosters will roll out basically everywhere at the same time around the world, and in the southern hemisphere it's a trough as Jeremy just explained, so we should have a trough, but then you have an actual winter peak.
3:47
Actual booster peak and another winter peak.
3:50
So that's everywhere in all the 17 countries we worked out where data is good in the southern hemisphere, we saw that peak.
3:57
And something you never saw before.
3:59
It's a new phenomenon.
4:00
Yes, yes.
4:01
And once you see it, once you recognize it, you know that the boosters are lethal in this way, then you go back to the data where you were dealing with winter data and you see that those winters are particularly intense when they had a booster at the same time.
4:15
and so you can quantify it in the northern hemisphere as well.
4:19
So all around and we're now expanding this to be more than a hundred countries but we systematically see definitively that there is more mortality during the vaccine campaigns and that there are specific peaks in mortality associated with each rollout in each age group
4:38
and in in many places around the world that cannot be understood in terms of all of a sudden there's a new deadly variant you know that it and we give it arguments in the paper as to why it cannot be this this silly argument that a new variant is always popping up at this time one of the arguments is if it were a question of variants it could not these peaks could not be synchronous around the world when everyone decided to follow the same schedule and put out their boosters at the same time
5:08
A new variant occurs in one place and has to spread.
5:11
You don't get synchronous peaks on the entire hemisphere.
5:16
So that's one of the counter arguments to the variant theory, but we have a whole series and we explained it in the paper.
5:22
So we wrote, this is our most recent paper.
5:24
And we really did it in detail.
5:27
And, but it's not the first paper that we've written about the toxicity of the vaccines because we've done a series, right?
5:34
With Israel, Australia.
5:37
Well the first one is India for me.
5:42
I noticed in my reading and in my study what was happening in India so I went ahead and just wrote a paper very very quickly because I didn't need data analysis because people had already studied India and had shown the data and saw this incredible increase of mortality with the vaccination campaign but didn't associate it to the vaccination campaign.
6:01
So all I did was point out
6:03
There it is, no excess mortality whatsoever in India until they roll out the vaccine and there's a huge peak.
6:09
That's not a coincidence.
6:11
And I explained how it couldn't be a coincidence and so on.
6:14
So I quickly looked at four papers, reviewed them and said, hey, India is a classic example of mortality induced by vaccination.
6:22
And Romania, you showed some data yesterday, the exact same, no excess death increase after COVID was
6:30
Not right after, so March-April 2020, no change in mortality.
6:36
At the same time, where in the Western world you typically often had hot spots that had peaks then, the Eastern Bloc countries and Romania do not have excess mortality at the beginning of the pandemic.
6:48
But in the following fall,
6:50
You know they do have a very large increase before they start vaccinating and that is classic for Russia and the eastern bloc countries and we're still trying to understand that and you've uncovered you've interviewed people that they're helping you to understand that's a very aggressive social policy social medical policy very very aggressive.
7:11
So we're talking about 17 million at the time of publishing when was that most recent paper published?
7:15
17th of September.
7:17
And what would that data be if you were to update it?
7:19
Are you able to give any approximation?
7:21
About the same because you see it's based on the quantified toxicity of the vaccine multiplied by the number of doses.
7:28
And since the doses are saturating now, it's a plateau you see.
7:32
So basically they're not vaccinating much more around the world anymore.
7:36
So the total number of doses is remaining the same.
7:39
So our estimate wouldn't change.
7:41
That's probably close to a saturation value.
7:44
Now there may be longer time effects due to, you were going to say, turbo cancers or something like that maybe.
7:52
And we're going to look at that.
7:53
We're going to look at that.
7:54
But the data we have up till now is robust data for the deaths that immediately follow the injections.
8:01
It's absolutely incredible to me that this was published September 17th of this year
8:08
It's not made headlines.
8:10
Mainstream media, silence, deafening.
8:13
We got one fact-checking from the Agence France-Presse.
8:16
Oh yeah, that's true.
8:18
Yeah, the fact-checkers.
8:19
We had some fact-checkers.
8:20
No, there was a big fact-checking organization also on the English side.
8:25
But AFP was written in English actually.
8:28
And the two different fact-checkers that I saw were giving different reasons that it was wrong.
8:33
Can you speak to one of those criticisms and then the response to it?
8:37
Yeah, the one in English that I remember is that, oh, well, look, we were measuring in many countries, we were measuring COVID deaths at the same time as a function of time.
8:48
And these peaks in mortality that they're talking about, there are peaks in COVID deaths as well.
8:52
I mean, that's just a silly, ridiculous criticism because
8:56
COVID death means respiratory problems and we acknowledge that the vaccine will kill people but that the actual mechanism from the weakened attacked metabolism will often be bacterial pneumonia or whatever it'll be respiratory you know that's the main killer so we're not
9:13
You see, when you say the vaccine killed someone, what you mean is it accelerated their deaths such that it occurs soon after vaccination.
9:20
That's what you mean.
9:21
You get a peak there, right?
9:23
But you're not saying that there were no comorbidities.
9:26
You're not saying that these are deaths that were caused solely by a toxic injection.
9:30
No, you're saying because there was a toxic injection with the comorbidities that exist in that fragile population, people died because of it.
9:39
COVID-19 Vaccine Toxicity Romania, Nov19,
9:54
and i wanted to say we need to insist on the fact that the older you are the more risk you have of taking the injection we calculated this vtfr vaccine dose fatality rate that increases exponentially with age so that's very important data
10:10
We were the first to demonstrate that the toxicity of the vaccine increases exponentially with your age and has a doubling time of four or five years in age.
10:21
So every four or five years in age, your risk of dying from the next injection doubles.
10:27
and so in Romania when you get into the 80 plus year olds you're looking at a very high risk of dying per injection like our our estimates right now are one death per five to ten injections in in Romania in the 80 plus year olds yeah so
10:42
And that's why it implies that prioritizing vaccination for the elderly people or the rich people, it's really not something we should do.
10:51
And we saw this also in Peru, and also actually in India, specifically in the festival campaign, vaccine festival campaign, they specifically say, yeah, exactly, this is a list of people with comorbidities that you should go get the vaccine.
11:05
Now they killed 3.7 million people in India with the vaccine rollout.
11:09
How are these deaths being covered up?
11:12
With propaganda.
11:14
And they're covered up locally because an elderly person dies and nobody complains and nobody goes out of their way to make the relationship to the injection.
11:24
Fantastic work that you're doing.
11:25
Thank you so much.
11:26
If I could add, all of our research reports on these questions are at correlation-canada.org.
Onwards!
Please subscribe or donate via Ko-fi – any amount from 3 bucks upwards. Don’t worry and God Bless, if you can’t or don’t want to. Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 Ko-fi donation a week!
Rheumatologists were pushing the vaccine as if they were getting paid per victim. They were. But of all doctors, they should know better. Their party line: The vaccine is better than natural immunity because "more antibodies". WUT? Their patients are often on a galg dozen anti-antibody drugs. Because they have too many antibodies! And those same drugs have been proven to suppress cytokine storms, reduce inflammation and improve circulation & respiration. They had no need of what effectively is worse than a live vaccine.
Endocrinologists too.
Clinicians are no different than technicians. Technicians are not engineers and clinicians are not scientists. Technicians use tools, clinicians use drugs. Both are instructed what to do in the event of a new problem. The technician will at least be held accountable and provide feedback to the manufacturer if the instructions or special tools are defective. But clinicians dont dare. They just keep doing the wrong thing, prescribing a toxic and/or useless drug to more & more people. And there's no taking apart & rebuilding a human once they're harmed by a drug. And no accountability, because clinicians, doctors, are just practicing. Yeah, on you. Would you let a inexperienced mechanic practice on your car & keep charging you when they fail to fix a problem, even damage your car then charge to fix it, then return to them over & over? Hell no. But you'll do so with your doctor. Why?
Oh my, accumulated toxic burden carried by top-of-the-food chain mammals, there's a reason "they" suggest pregnant women not eating tuna fish (accumulated mercury from smaller fish). Think about Polar bears. Ran into an epidemiologist on another stack, asked what these people are thinking, shooting up the elderly first? Its not just covid shots! over the age of say 60 years old, many are loaded with toxins from shingles shot, annual flu shots, a new pneumonia shot, and they are planning rsv shots. (what about depression, dementia, Alzheimers, go figure!) He called this the great culling. Many so-called Authorities 'round the world must have seen this potential prior to rolling these out to "Protect the elderly" - yup, send them all off to heaven, in double- or triple-time. Is this to reduce their economic burden on medical systems and social safety nets. What's your guess?