Dr John Campbell reprises the two cases brought to the UK High Court against the Oxford/AstraZeneca C19 injection, brought under the Consumer Protection Act 1987
First a last chance for governments around the world to object to the amendments to the International Health Regulations 2005 that were passed in May 2022. The eighteen month period stipulated in those amendments 18 months ago expires on 30 November 2023 – in exactly three weeks from today.
The existing International Health Regulations forced governments globally – via this “treaty” – to obey WHO diktats that mandated all the testing, lockdowns, injections etc that bankrupted businesses, destroyed lives globally and plunged hundreds of millions of people in developing countries BACK into starvation, reversing decades of progress and economic growth.
More details on the IHR2005 amendments and Pandemic Treaty here:
(100) The Deadline is December 1, 2023 - James Roguski (substack.com)
Suffice to say, there are even more amendments – sufficient to rewrite the Regulations and establish a new Pandemic Treaty that will make the abhorrent existing regulations look like a holiday. All those voices against national ID’s? There will be global ID’s plus mass surveillance and control of everything from bank accounts to travel to utilities to ensure compliance. The next Public Health Emergency of International Concern will be “Climate Change”, perhaps even “prohibition” or a ban on smoking or meat. These latest amendments are intended to be approved (because of the May 2002 changes in May 2023.
One of the May 2022 amendments about to be enacted is a shortening of the approval period from that 18 months to just 6 months. There is a May 2024 meeting (following World Health Assembly and World Health Organization protocols) that is due to pass the new amendments and pandemic treaty. There is a “Working Group” formulating the new amendments – but it is running into issues. Manufacturers of “vaccines” are protesting that they will have to give up patents and developing countries are protesting that they will not be getting “equity” for the distribution of “vaccines”. All the while ignoring the fact that the “vaccines” kill more people than they cure. Talk about two wolves arguing with an absent sheep about “what’s for dinner”.
Ok, to the issue at hand. The case against Oxford/AstraZeneca under the 1987 UK Consumer Protection Act.
The Act is up to date to 4 October 2023 and is described here:
Consumer Protection Act 1987 (legislation.gov.uk)
Some (right of centre, broadsheet) press coverage here
Oxford AstraZeneca Covid jab was ‘defective’, claims landmark legal case (telegraph.co.uk)
The fact that the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine (a viral vector vaccine, not an mRNA injection) caused harm is not a “shock”. The “shock” is that the UK justice system bankrupts people who are seeking redress and takes so long to even hear a case is the “shock”.
How many doses were administered in the UK? Well, that’s a secret of course, but here is a story from the “woke” disinformation specialists at the BBC from November 2020.
Covid-19: Oxford University vaccine is highly effective - BBC News
“The UK government has pre-ordered 100 million doses of the Oxford vaccine, and AstraZeneca says it will make three billion doses for the world next year.”
Here’s a little more background:
The story behind the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine success – UKRI
£200,000 funding boost for Oxford’s Clinical BioManufacturing Facility | University of Oxford
Most of those global doses – around 2 billion or so - were made under license and distributed by the Serum Institute of India to the people of India. I hope the people of India are paying attention and are aware of the potential for harms inflicted on them. It might be that the Serum Institute has higher manufacturing quality standards than the Oxford/AstraZeneca in the UK, maybe they are worse. Do they aspirate injections or inject into veins, vessels or arteries?
Regular readers will be familiar with this estimate of deaths in India from injections over a few months of 2021:
I produced this table in this article a year ago. Reflecting data reported to the European Medicines Agency’s adverse event reporting system, EUDRA, to 12 November 2022:
The above numbers need to be adjusted for an under-reporting factor which is probably higher than the likely 30-40 for VAERS and is closer to 70 (h/t Momo).
The architect of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine is Professor Sarah Gilbert, who received these awards, according to Wikipedia.
2021 – Humanists UK Rosalind Franklin Medal[46]
2021 – Albert Medal of the Royal Society of Arts[50]
2021 – Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire (DBE) in the 2021 Birthday Honours for services to science and to public health in COVID-19 vaccine development[51]
2021 – Princess of Asturias Award for Technical & Scientific Research[52]
2021 – Royal Society of Medicine Gold Medal[53]
2022 – Honorary doctorate of science from the University of East Anglia[54]
2023 – King Faisal Prize in Medicine[55]
2023 – Fellow of the Royal Society (FRS)[56]
Maybe she would have received more awards if the vaccine she designed had killed and injured more people. Those giving out those awards – including those awarding the OBE – must have rocks in their heads and be completely oblivious to reality as well.
Along with other cases against mRNA injections (Costa Rica tomorrow!), there might just be signs that the entire edifice of the use of improperly authorized vaccines and injections may be about to come crashing down.
Ok, having set the scene, here are some of the good doctor’s cliff notes about the cases being brought.
Dr Campbell’s 17 minute YouTube video is here:
First high court case - YouTube
Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine has been branded “defective” - Claims efficacy, vastly overstated - High Court test case
Claim, Consumer Protection Act 1987, argues AstraZeneca vaccine “defective” (not as safe as individuals were entitled to expect)
Could pave the way for 80 damages claims (£80 million) - Vaccine-induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (VITT) - Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) - At least 81 deaths in the UK, suspected to be linked to clotting and low platelets - (almost one in five sufferers died)
WHO, 13 June 2022 - “The vaccine is safe and effective for all individuals aged 18 and above.”
AstraZeneca last night to the Telegraph - Patient safety was its “highest priority” - Vaxzevria, “continuously been shown to have an acceptable safety profile”
Regulators around the world “consistently state that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of extremely rare potential side effects”.
Question about UK Government monitoring - Germany suspended use in under 60s, end of March 2021 - UK, stopped for under 30s April 7th 2021, UK, stopped for under 40s May 2021
Freedom of Information request - 148 pay-outs under Government Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme - 144 for AZ, (£120,000) – (£17.28 million total).
WhatsApp messages to or from Matt Hancock
Concerns aired by US authorities - AstraZeneca never applied for a licence in the US
Sir John Bell, Professor of medicine Oxford (Government’s chief adviser on life sciences) and adviser to the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation - AstraZeneca had become “really frazzled” - “They accept that their comms are a bit clunky, and they misjudged some things like clinical trials data and manufacturing, partly because they’ve not done a vaccine before.”
Legal argument - No warning of the risk of VITT in the product information sheet at the time.
AstraZeneca issued press releases following clinical trials, Vaxzevria, between 62% to 90% per cent effective at preventing symptomatic Covid-19 “In fact, the absolute risk reduction concerning Covid-19 prevention was only 1.2 per cent.”
(Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority)
The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority | PMCPA
Lawyers to examine government reassurance - Mr Hancock, (accompanying departmental minute)- “The data so far on this vaccine suggests that there will be no adverse reactions, and so no liability.”
Sarah Moore, partner at Hausfeld - “The group of individuals whom we represent have always been clear: they do not dabble in anti-vaccine conspiracy theories - However, it is plainly factually inaccurate to claim that vaccines do no harm given the experience of our client group – the vaccine injured and bereaved.”
AZ point - MHRA had granted “full marketing approval… for the UK based on the safety profile and efficacy of the vaccine”.
Fingers crossed that those injured and who lost loved ones receive compensation.
If the case is proven and compensation of 80 million pounds per case is determined, AstraZeneca and Oxford University will become extinct. There are likely to be millions od cases (5 million if 5% of people taking their vaccine were impacted to varying degrees? The sheep will be eating the wolves for dinner. Of course, if the compensation is paid by the UK Government, then the people will be taxed to develop the vaccine, harmed by its use and then made to pay for the damage. All while getting no help from the UK justice system to prove the crimes committed.
Onwards!
Please subscribe or make a donation via ko-fi. Don’t worry, if you can’t or don’t want to.
Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 ko-fi donation a week!
Just watched his video. Rabbit Holes are getting deeper and covid is just a tiny chunk of the plan
Just in case if anyone is interested (new documentary) https://rumble.com/v3uv317-shot-dead-vaccine-injury-documentary-full-documentary.html