Dr John Campbell’s take on “the Danish Study” of the correlation of individual batches/lots with adverse events from Pfizer C19 mRNA injections

All to be viewed in the context that the C19 mRNA injections are NOT VACCINES .

NO-ONE HAS BEEN VACCINATED - THEY HAVE BEEN INJECTED WITH AN EXPERIMENTAL CONCOCTION OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES.

The injections do not prevent infection, transmission, hospitalization or death. Facts know even at the time of the Phase 3 Clinical Trials and the post-authorization marketing reports to regulators everywhere.

The injections FAILED the clinical trials, the FAILED safety standards at the post-marketing authorization report level and they FAILED over the two and half years of their use across the world.

From here:

Viral Vaccine paper - YouTube

The good Doctors cliff notes start below:

Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine#

Batch‐dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine - Schmeling - European Journal of Clinical Investigation - Wiley Online Library.. - this is a link to the peer reviewed study dated 31 MARCH 2023 – 3 months ago.

71% of the suspected adverse reactions occurred in 4.2% of the vaccine batches

Numbers of suspected adverse events (SAEs), after BNT612b2 mRNA vaccination in Denmark. 27 December 2020–11 January 2022, (population 5.8 million) (According to the number of doses per vaccine batch)

Each dot represents a single vaccine batch. By 11 November 2022 (European area) 701 million doses of Pfizer given 971,021 reports of suspected adverse effects (SAEs)

Clinical data on individual vaccine batch levels have not been reported (batch-dependent variation in the clinical efficacy and safety of authorized vaccines would appear to be highly unlikely)

We therefore examined rates of SAEs between different BNT162b2 vaccine batches administered in Denmark Data on all SAE cases,

Danish Medical Agency (DKMA) SAE seriousness was classified as non-serious, serious (hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, life-threatening illness, permanent disability or congenital malformation) or SAE-related d****

Anonymized data SAEs were counted on a batch level by linking individual SAEs to the batch label(s) of BNT162b dose(s)

10,793,766 doses administered 4,026,575 persons 52 different BNT162b2 vaccine batches (2,340–814,320 doses per batch)

43,496 SAEs were registered in 13,635 persons (Editors note - this does not reflect any under-reporting that could be between 30 and 100 - which could be somewhere between only one in 30 events reported or only one in 100 events reported)

61,847 batch-identifiable SAEs, of which 14,509 (23.5%) were classified as severe, 579 (0.9%) were SAE-related d*****

Unexpectedly Rates of SAEs per 1000 doses varied considerably between vaccine batches From 1 SAE per 20 doses given to I in many thousands to zero

Variabilities

·        Vaccine manufacturing

·        Storage Transportation

·        Clinical handling and control

·        Administration technique

End of cliff notes.

The adverse events were NOT age dependent – Danish health workers were injected first along with the most vulnerable.

Dr Campbell makes the valid point that it has taken independent researchers with no funding to produce this report in their spare time.

The point is also made that, Danish health authorities acted in the same way as every health authority in every country by NOT looking for analysing adverse events from specific lot numbers.

Note, this is NOT VAERS data. The data may have been reported to VAERS as per regulations, but the sub-contractors to the CDC/FDA - General Dynamic IT may or may not have processed them onto VAERS.

Of course, health authorities lacked the competence and desire to even check the contents of administered injections produced by shoddy manufacturing with the contents of the injections in the clinical trials. In other words, the manufacturers could have mass-produced ANYTHING and the health authorities would not have noticed,

I still don’t understand why giving a toxic injection (that cancelled any remaining immune system response for 14 days anyway) to elderly and infirm people with non-existent or severely compromised immune systems could be expected to generate an immune response from those non-existent or severely compromised immune systems!

To myself, as a lay person, this is akin to the chances of survival of elderly and inform people to a snake bite compared to a healthy person. It simply makes no sense.

Onwards

Please upgrade to paid, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan  Buying just one Ko-Fi a week  for $3 is 50 bucks more than an annual $100 subscription!