Elon Musk replies to critics of cutting 1.7 trillion bucks of fraudulent federal spending
From this 10-minute video here:
Elon Musk Calls For Impeachment Of Judge Blocking Doge: Court Orders Evidence Gathered Be Destroyed
One judge has banned all Trump cabinet members from accessing ANY federal records - including the Treasury Secretary.
“The explosive conflict between Musk's DOGE team and the Treasury Department Why Musk claims up to $1.7 trillion in annual government waste could be exposed.
The controversial court order demanding destruction of evidence Musk's call for the judge's impeachment and the legal implications
How this case could impact the future of government transparency Is this a case of judicial overreach or a necessary safeguard? Watch now to uncover the truth behind this high-stakes showdown that could reshape American politics.
From Brave AI:
“Elon Musk has called for the impeachment of U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer, who temporarily blocked his team's access to Treasury Department payment systems and sensitive data.
Musk's demand for impeachment comes after Judge Engelmayer's order, which was made in response to a lawsuit filed by 19 state attorneys general claiming that Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) had no authority to access the systems.
The order has been described by Musk as "absolutely insane" and he has accused the judge of protecting corruption.”
There are many more “cases” of judges blocking Trump’s Executive Orders. SCTUS might be getting very busy, very soon!
Onwards!!!
I think Elon’s “go f$ck yourself” applies to this judge.
According to the judicial branch of the U.S., the 4th Amendment right to "privacy" ONLY applies to government activities (with our tax dollars and our lives). Likewise, they firmly enforce their false "precedent" that another protected "right" bestowed upon government, is the right to exterminate Americans at-will, so long as government claims (but is never called to prove) a "compelling interest" in murdering us.
So long as the government makes the claim that murdering Americans is in the "national interest" our judicial branch authorizes this as a "protected activity" that may never be challenged in court, not in any way. This is where they claim the plaintiffs don't have "standing" and simply dismiss all complaints which dare to question the authority of the U.S. government to murder us.
No case claiming it's NOT in the national interest to murder and maim Americans will EVER reach the evidentiary stage until we root out these demonic forces who currently control our courts at every level.
We read the PLAIN LANGUAGE of our founding documents and Amendments. They state what government may NOT do. They are clearly intended to LIMIT what government may do. And yet, our courts claim all of these protections (rights) belong exclusively to GOVERNMENT - to protect the government from "we the people" ever even pretending to be "self-governing." Sponge Bob Square Pants would do a MUCH better job of "interpreting" the U.S. Constitution than our current slate of demons who presently run our judicial system.