Emeritus Professors of Physics and Atmospheric Science from Princeton and MIT state that politics and persistently failed models are being used to impose regulations

The Cult of Moloch and assorted political swamp critters plan to bankrupt the US and make it ungovernable.

““..according to Reuters, the United States is projected to spend about $500 billion to fight climate change over the next decade, including $362 billion from the Inflation Reduction Act, $98 billion from the Infrastructure Act, and $54 billion from the CHIPS law.”

Not health care, not roads, not bridges, not inflation, not tech upgrades – grift paid to junk scientists for junk science so that imports from China (that exploit child slave labour in the Congo and elsewhere) can be installed as eyesores of solar panel plantations and forests of windmills across the US.

From a 47 page paper here:

Happer-Lindzen-EPA-Power-Plants-2023-07-19.pdf (co2coalition.org)

To give you an idea of what’s in the report, there are these sections:

Quite the report on failings of the EPA and its politicization by the Cult of Moloch!

Worth posting the conclusions:

“VII. Conclusions.

In sum, the EPA has acted arbitrarily and capriciously in what it has failed to consider and what it has considered as the basis for the Proposed Rule.

EPA has failed to consider critical aspects and data that reflect the enormous social benefits of CO2, the enormous social benefits of fossil fuels, the scientific proof that there is no danger of catastrophic global warming from the use of fossil fuels and resulting CO2 emissions, and the disastrous consequences of restricting or eliminating them, including eliminating 61% of electricity in the United States provided by fossil fuel electricity plants.

Under State Farm and its progeny, failing to consider such crucial aspects of the problem that the rule purports to address is the hallmark of arbitrary and capricious agency action.

EPA, by the same token, has erred by relying on data and other unscientific sources that only worsen its failures stated above. Consensus, peer review, government opinion from the IPCC, models that do not work, omission of contradictory data, and fabrication of supporting data do not pass muster under even the basic principles of the scientific method and do not provide scientific knowledge.

These flimsy methods of analysis should not provide the foundation for far-reaching national environmental policy. Taken together, the EPA’s proposed Fossil Fuel Power Plant rule is fatally flawed and should not be adopted, or at minimum must be revised from the ground up. As scientists, we urge the EPA to change course from the fraught path it has outlined in the Proposed Rule.”

So there is that then!

The Epoch Times provided its analysis and commentary here (h/t Peter)

Two Princeton, MIT Scientists Say EPA Climate Regulations Based on a ‘Hoax’ | The Epoch Times

“Citing extensive data (pdf) to support their case, William Happer, professor emeritus in physics at Princeton University, and Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), argued that the claims used by the EPA to justify the new regulations are not based on scientific facts but rather political opinions and speculative models that have consistently proven to be wrong. “

Here’s a few charts extracted from the Epoch Times piece:

Current plans, if replicated globally, would cause mass starvation.

“Increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere create more food for people worldwide, including more food for people in drought-stricken areas,” they stated. “Increases in carbon dioxide over the past two centuries since the Industrial Revolution, from about 280 parts per million to about 420 ppm, caused an approximate 20 percent increase in the food available to people worldwide, as well as increased greening of the planet and a benign warming in temperature.”

One more chart.

“Climate models like the ones that the EPA is using have been consistently wrong for decades in predicting actual outcomes, Mr. Happer told The Epoch Times. He presented the table below to the EPA to illustrate his point.”

Onwards

Please upgrade to paid, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan  Buying just one Ko-Fi a week  for $3 is 50 bucks more than an annual $100 subscription!