From the many in the Oz trenches on the front line - Australian Gene Technology Regulator, Dr Raj Bhula .. admits modRNA products are GMOs

Posted verbatim from an email:

Start:

where does one begin when a Regulator, meant to be a subject matter expert, capitulates and starts telling the truth

.. only to then lie further as a means for distancing themselves from an earlier lie this GMO hole is only being dug deeper and deeper by Dr Raj Bhula

first .. some history

Australia's Gene Technology Regulator, Raj Bhula, appeared before the Australian Senate's Community Affairs Legislation Committee on 16 February 2023, where she inexplicably stated:

‘The mRNA Covid-19 vaccines did not involve any step of genetic modification.’

(click the pic) (Ed: link)
mRNA jabs use genetic engineering yet the TGA didn't consult with the Gene Tech Regulator 16.02.23 - YouTube

.. frankly, that was either a lie or evidence of incompetence fast forward 10 months and Dr Bhula appeared again before the Community Affairs Legislation Committee, last Thursday, 26 October between February and October our team with the aid of Senator Gerard Rennick presented to the Australian Federal Police (AFP), and the Attorney-General of Australia, Mark Dreyfus, a Brief of Information & Evidence to show both Pfizer and Moderna continue to commit serious criminal offenses in this country, for failing to first (maybe) obtain GMO licenses from the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) we allege the same in our civil law Federal Court GMO proceedings against Pfizer and Moderna (still ongoing)

.. but recently the AFP shut down their investigation on the criminal brief, without any explanation .. but not before they shared our Brief of Information & Evidence with the OGTR .. namely, with Dr Raj Bhula

.. the person we allege in the Brief provided a non-credible view on these products - read paragraphs 40 and 43-52 in the attached Brief of Information & Evidence .. only a couple of minutes

so I dare say after Dr Bhula had time to consider our criminal Brief and how utterly implausible her February statement was, she appears to have thought it better to adjust her testimony .. as seen last Thursday, 26 October

.. and boy did she do that, and then some

here we introduce our favourite mouse, Jikky, of Jikkyleaks .. click the pic to listen to the testimony of Dr Bhula

(12) Jikkyleaks 🐭 on X: "BOOM 💥💥 It's a gene therapy. It was a gene therapy yesterday. It will still be a gene therapy tomorrow. With a plasmid, it's two gene therapies. The OGTR confirms: "Under the gene technology act an [OGTR] approval would have been required" @SenatorRennick @double_christ https://t.co/G6ubUOMtwO" / X (twitter.com)

.. I'll wait a sec

yes, you may need to re-listen a few times, but the nub of Dr Bhula's latest position/back-peddle is this:

The modRNA products involve gene technology

The gene technology is used to genetically modify the products

Had that manufacturing step taken place in Australia, the products would have needed to be regulated by the OGTR

.. now let's be very clear here - the OGTR regulates ONLY one thing - Genetically Modified Organisms .. GMOs .. nothing else

as such, this latest testimony is an implicit admission the modRNA products satisfy the Australian legal definitions for being deemed and called GMOs

but Bhula says she didn't have to regulate them because they were manufactured overseas .. really Raj? - then why did AstraZeneca require a GMO license despite being manufactured overseas?

.. as one enraged Twitter/X user observed:

We don't need to test/approve it as a gene therapy because we didn't manufacture it here.

Are you F'ing kidding me.

Do you test imported cars for safety in Australia, or are they allowed to head right to the streets just because they are manufactured somewhere else?

to assist Raj Bhula, let me explain the Gene Technology legislation a little so everyone is clear

first, by her own admission, Dr Bhula agrees the following legal definitions apply to the Pfizer and Moderna products, namely:

"genetically modified organism" means:

                     (a)  an organism that has been modified by gene technology;

"organism" means any biological entity that is:

                     (c)  capable of transferring genetic material.

"gene technology" means any technique for the modification of genes or other genetic material

think of the modRNA and DNA contaminate being encapsulated in the LNPs, where the LNPs transfer that genetic material throughout human bodies and into cells .. aka .. transferring genetic material

.. and lets us not forget .. synthetic DNA with SV40 promoters and enhancers where the latter directs the synthetic DNA into the cell nucleus .. hello transgenesis

now that Dr Bhula is clear with everyone that these are GMOs, (and yes, Gene Therapy products), the OGTR must regulate the following 'dealings' with said GMOs when on Australian soil

.. the Section 10 definition is clear .. tell me what part is perhaps difficult for Dr Bhula:

"deal with" , in relation to a GMO, means the following:

                     (a)  conduct experiments with the GMO;

                     (b)  make, develop, produce or manufacture the GMO;

                     (c)  breed the GMO;

                     (d)  propagate the GMO;

                     (e)  use the GMO in the course of manufacture of a thing that is not the GMO;

                      (f)  grow, raise or culture the GMO;

                     (g)  import the GMO;

                     (h)  transport the GMO;

                      (i)  dispose of the GMO;

and includes the possession, supply or use of the GMO for the purposes of, or in the course of, a dealing mentioned in any of paragraphs (a) to (i).

.. as clear as day everyone should see the legislation requires the OGTR to also regulate dealings after the (b) manufacturing phase too .. irrespective of whether or not the manufacturing occurred overseas .. just like with AstraZeneca

and by regulate, this simply means Pfizer and Moderna needed to apply for GMO licenses, and the OGTR, if they were to grant those licenses, would have set conditions around those dealings

which dealings, in fact?

Items (g), (h), and (i) above .. the importation, transport and disposal of the modRNA products once on Australian soil

.. and here is the zinger Dr Bhula is trying her utmost not to acknowledge

Transport includes regulating and placing conditions within a GMO license to protect the health of Australians at the 'delivery site' of the GMOs in question which for these products was always ever only going to be one place

.. Humans

Lawyers Katie Ashby-Koppens, Peter Fam and I will be updating the criminal Brief of Information & Evidence to include this sudden admission .. the truth, at last .. by our Gene Technology Regulator, while pointing out to the AFP and Australia's Attorney-General, that Dr Bhula's further statements asserting her regulatory authority did not extend to dealings in these GMOs once they landed in Australia, are utterly without merit and betray an ongoing deceit or wholesale incompetence

needless to say, now with the likelihood of gross synthetic DNA contamination and genomic integration having and continuing to occur, Australia's OGTR needs to be gutted

.. its leadership and advisors questioned and examined

with clear medical and scientific acknowledgment of what this utter failure to protect Australians from, has wrought

Our thanks and gratitude go to Australian Senator Gerard Rennick .. thank you Sir

.. and another person pivotal in what occurred in the Senate Committee this week - Dr Julie Sladden

.. writer, medical doctor, advisor to Russell Broadbent MP, secretary of ASF, and a good egg .. thank you Julie

please share widely

Julian Gillespie

LLB, BJuris

End

Onwards!

Please subscribe or make a donation via ko-fi. “God Bless You” if you can’t or don’t want to.

Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 ko-fi donation a week!