From “The Media is the Virus and Soros is the infection” files – check out the 10 news outlets the libtard demoNrats do not want you to read

Just the News has published a story on Soros sponsored censorship:

Disinformation index collapses after targeting conservative media content | Just The News

Just the News did not make the top ten of censored sites!

What is the “Disinformation Index”?

From here:

The Global Disinformation Index

“The Global Disinformation Index (GDI) has released a new report on disinformation risks within the United States media market. This research was led by GDI and was conducted by a team of researchers from the Global Disinformation Lab at the University of Texas at Austin from June to October of 2022.”

Here are the news outlets that you may not be aware of have been subject to the “S-oro-S Censorship”

Keep in mind that work done by Pew Research cited by GDI/GDL “85% percent of Americans getting at least some news from a digital device, according to a study from Pew Research. Those younger than 50 years of age get their news almost exclusively from online sources.”

10 riskiest online news outlets" as the New York Post, Reason, RealClearPolitics, Daily Wire, the Blaze, the Media Research Center, One America News Network, the American Conservative, the Federalist, Newsmax and Spectator.”

Just the News states:

 “A State Department-backed group is severing its connections with a disinformation index group also backed by progressive megadonor George Soros – following reports about the group's efforts to muzzle conservative media outlets by blacklisting them with advertisers.

The National Endowment for Democracy, a private foundation created by Congress whose funding is part of the State Department budget, said it will no longer provide grants to the Global Disinformation Index, according to The Washington Times.  “

National Endowment for Democracy (NED)? Talk about a tangled web to hide using Federal money and student tuition fees to suppress free speech – and by a State University too.

How much was given by tax-payers from across the nation by “NED”?

“The NED gave $250,000 in grants to the risk-ratings group to identify and combat disinformation in China and other authoritarian regimes. “

Ok, China and other authoritarian regimes, got it. In the US? Really? Not bad money or a bunch of students radicalized over a life time by “faculty” like these!

Faculty and Staff Bios - GDIL | Global Disinformation Lab at UT Austin.

Where does Soros fit in?

“Soros reportedly funded the index through the Open Society Foundations, his primary grant-making program.”

Details are not easily trackable via the internet. Buried on websites like this – no doubt S-oro-S “charitable foundations” pay zero tax and simply “boost” taxpayer and student funds and redirect to those politically aligned - that is, “bought and paid for” hacks.

Funding by George Soros and Open Society — UniversityPhilanthropy.com

Same goes for politicians and District Attorneys – bought and paid for by “foundations”.

Here’s a question that is not touched by anyone: S-oro-S is not doing this because he has a “heart of gold”, he has a “heart of pure evil” (to borrow a term from The Time Bandits).

Much like Gates, his “foundation” creates demand for products that he sells downstream by manipulating gullible supranational institutions and governments. S-oro-S is involved in many “businesses” spread throughout the world. The easiest way to make money is to get others to give it to you. Governments and supranational institutions have access to billions and are notoriously stupid.

That’s the guts of the story, here is a little deeper dive on the University of Texas censorship of free speech program that is almost certainly replicated in every State University across the country in order to make sure students are radicalized, groomed, assimilated and turned into good little libtard demoNrats.

Key question: how much lower would student fees be if money was not spent on projects like this and instead the general fund that does the pooling at University of Texas was used to reduce tuition costs. No doubt there are a bunch of highly paid academics that would claim the research is self-funding. Okay, then hive it off into a private company and let it stand on its own flat feet.

Check out the scrolling images from the GDL website:

The GDI’s stated mission includes assessing "disinformation risk in media markets."

What is a Global Disinformation Lab?

From here:

Home - GDIL | Global Disinformation Lab at UT Austin

“Disinformation is Global. So Are We.

The Global DisInformation Lab (GDIL) was established in 2020 at the University of Texas at Austin to encourage collaborative interdisciplinary academic research on the global circulation of misinformation, and disinformation.”

Leave aside the funders of the Disinformation Index for the moment, let’s see how the University of Texas is funded to answer the question “Where’s the Beef”?

Sources of Revenue - University of Texas at Austin (utexas.edu)

“..the Available University Fund comprise the vast majority of academic core funding in the university’s budget.  Gifts and endowments provide additional resources greatly enhancing academic programs.  Research contracts and grants support UT Austin’s research enterprise, and revenues generated by the institution’s self-supporting auxiliary enterprises fund the provision of services and activities.”

More here: About The Budget | Budget Office (utexas.edu)

A tangled web that relies on disguise to achieve political ends by censorship, distraction, projection of sin onto enemies and so on and so forth.

Onwards!

Please subscribe, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan