From the YCMTSU files – Australian regulator invents a pseudonym so it can complain to itself about a doctor prescribing Ivermectin
You cannot make this shit up (YCMTSU)
From here:
“A Sydney-based general practitioner (“GP”) is facing charges for prescribing ivermectin to treat covid. A dubious claim was made to the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (“AHPRA”) about the GP. When the GP investigated who had made the complaint, it appears as if AHPRA had made the complaint themselves under the name “John Smith.”
Which rather begs the question. How many times had the AHPRA done this and how many other health regulators around the word have employed similar tactics in illegal attempts to ban the off label use of Ivermectin – and any other treatment?
“AHPRA had obtained the prescription information that formed the basis of the dubious complaint, as well as other prescriptions, directly from the pharmacy where the GP had left the prescriptions to be fulfilled. These prescriptions were made out before the Therapeutic Goods Administration (“TGA”) banned the use of ivermectin to treat covid, as announced on 10 September 2021.”
Interesting, ivermectin could be legally prescribed up 10 September 2021.
From here:
New restrictions on prescribing ivermectin for COVID-19 | Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)
“Today, the TGA, acting on the advice of the Advisory Committee for Medicines Scheduling, has placed new restrictions on the prescribing of oral ivermectin.
General practitioners are now only able to prescribe ivermectin for TGA-approved conditions (indications) - scabies and certain parasitic infections.
Certain specialists including infectious disease physicians, dermatologists, gastroenterologists and hepatologists (liver disease specialists) will be permitted to prescribe ivermectin for other unapproved indications if they believe it is appropriate for a particular patient.”
So, the off label use of every other drug being used was fine, just not the almost free, safe and effective ivermectin used billions of times globally over decades – and a listed “model” WHO “essential medicines”,
eEML - Electronic Essential Medicines List (essentialmeds.org)
The Australian regulator had “strongly discouraged” the use of HCQ in March 2020 – within weeks of outset of the PHEIC declared by the WHO on 30 January 2020.
“Given the limited evidence for effect against COVID-19, as well as the risk of significant adverse effects, the TGA strongly discourages the use of hydroxychloroquine outside of its current indications at this time other than in a clinical trial setting or in a controlled environment in the treatment of severely ill patients in hospital.”
HCQ is also on the WHO list of essential medicines. Used for many more decades safely and effectively,
Ponders – I wonder what would have happened if every medic had “mistakenly” diagnosed C19 as early stage malaria, or river blindness or a tick-borne disease.
Back to the Expose.com article.
“The following is a copy of a tweet posted by Dr. My-Le Trinh a doctor in Sydney, Australia, who graduated from the University of Sydney in 1991. She has been a general practitioner for 27 years. On 27 October 2021, she was suspended from practice because she prescribed an off-label drug containing ivermectin in treating a patient with covid. Her tribunal begins on Friday 18 August 2023.”
Hardly a “quack” and likely to have far more experience than most of the regulators in actually treating people – with no officially upheld complaints leading to disqualification – just this fabricated charge by the regulator.
You would think that the charge would be thrown out for the unethical behaviour of entrapment and the regulator sued for millions for slander or some such, right? I would make a bet that regulators in Canada used this tactic – A LOT.
“Two complaints were made against me on the same day, within hours of each other through the same AHPRA portal system. In New South Wales, it’s uncommon to have complaints from via the AHPRA portal.”
Questions posed in the Expose.com plus a little nugget:
Questions:
AHPRA, are you John Smith?
Is it lawful for the HCCC or medical council to knowingly investigate a falsified complaint?
Is the HCCC obligated to refer the John Smith complaint and AHPRA to ICAC [Independent Commission Against Corruption] for an investigation?
Did the HCCC knowingly use a falsified complaint to justify an investigation of an innocent doctor in order to prosecute her all because of a political agenda?
Excess deaths in Peru declined 14 times when Ivermectin was used; increased 13 times when access was restricted
“This paper was suppressed for two years! How many lives would have been saved if it had been published promptly?” Meryl Dorey wrote.”
Onwards
Please upgrade to paid, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan Buying just one Ko-Fi a week for $3 is 50 bucks more than an annual $100 subscription!
In a perverse way I find this encouraging as a) it’s been found out b) it demonstrates the vacuous nature of the science deployed by the authorities and c) its remarkable how much has emerged in just the last week.
My impression is the perpetrators are now getting very worried as their master plan unravels.
However the excess death data is very hard to hide as we must be getting to the point most know at least someone with a turbo cancer, stroke or heart attack out of the blue.
My own count is sadly up to 12 people now following a friends wife heart attack yesterday.
That the U.K. Daily Telegraph is as of this morning reporting record numbers of heart attacks in the U.K. ,having been very pro vax/ government propaganda to the point of absurdity, is interesting.
I remain however convinced this will be “ resolved” is when the public realise en masse what has been done to them, they have been duped and real anger follow.
If I were a perpetrator I would be getting very worried.
From a description of price fixing:
Price fixing is an anticompetitive agreement between participants on the same side in a market to buy or sell a product, service, or commodity only at a fixed price, or maintain the market conditions such that the price [product] is maintained at a given level by controlling supply and demand.
From a description of racketeering:
Racketeering is a type of organized crime in which the persons set up a coercive, fraudulent, extortionary, or otherwise illegal coordinated scheme or operation (a "racket") to repeatedly or consistently collect a profit.
How is it NOT criminal when Governments engage in exactly this behaviour??!