Fulton County, Georgia DA Fani (spell check) Willis case against Trump based on a lie by Fuchs (spell check) who was Raffensperger’s campaign manager and an illegal (in NY) recorded call
From here:
Brad Raffensperger Ordered to Testify Against Mark Meadows in Georgia Case - The Billings Report
“Corrupt Brad Raffensperger has been ordered to testify against Mark Meadows in the bogus Fani Willis’ political circus. In late December 2020, President Trump made a call to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, asking him to look into voter fraud.
That phone call was recorded and Jordan Fuchs told the WaPo that President Trump had asked Brad Raffensperger to find the votes that would give him the victory.
But Fuchs lied. President Trump had asked Raffensperger to investigate a specific item of voter fraud.
There is also a question about the legality of the recording. Nothing has been proven yet, but it is believed that Fuchs was in New York and recorded the conversation from there.
In Georgia, it is legal for just one party to record a phone conversation, but in New York, you have to inform the other party that you are recording them. Fuchs tried to delete the recording to cover up her false statements, but the deleted recording was found deleted on her computer.
She had the recording but Fuchs is a founding member of the Never Trumper movement as is faux Republican Raffensperger, and so she lied and then tried to hide the evidence.”
Probably nothing…
Here’s the back story:
“In February 2021 Georgia District Attorney Fani Willis opened an investigation into President Trump based on his call to Brad Raffensperger following the 2020 election that was later leaked and misrepresented to the Washington Post.”
Amazing. Two and half years to bring a case and it starts falling apart in a few weeks.
Jonathon Turley wrote a piece here about the trial and how Meadows will probably get the case heard in Federal Court – which weakens the case tactic of trying 19 people in one place on a conspiracy charge.
First on the overall case:
“The call was misrepresented by the Post and the transcript later showed that Trump was not simply demanding that votes be added to the count but rather asking for another recount or continued investigation.
Again, I disagreed with that position but the words about the finding of 11,780 votes was in reference to what he was seeking in a continued investigation.
Critics were enraged by the suggestion that Trump was making the case for a recount as opposed to just demanding the addition of votes to the tally or fraudulent findings.”
And on Meadows:
“The most interesting takeaway is that Willis may have overplayed her hand by including Meadows. In doing so, she may have created the strongest avenue for removal. I believe that she hoped that Meadows would “flip.”
Instead, he is leading the charge to federal court. Even if Judge Jones denies the motion, it can now be appealed and there are solid arguments here in his favor. “
Lots more discussion in the Turley piece.
Looks like the clowns are going to be throwing the water over the crowd soon, just before they climb into the cannon.
Onwards!
Please buy a subscription or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 coffee a week!
Seems like there’s a spider under every rock.