Discussion about this post

User's avatar
kerrylyn's avatar

The interview clarified a few things for me. Also, thanks for your concise summary. I think Dr Gilthorpe was too dismissive of no virus group and to suggest they're manipulative and somehow twisting the facts is false, i.e. re isolation/purification process. It's either pure or impure, "pure enough" is a ridiculous concept. Info. on patents was useful. Karen Kingston and Dr Gilthorpe should debate this openly. KK is sticking to her guns, including re. paper she claims shows proof of GO and that Gilmore claims is simply about coating to enhance imaging techniques or something like that. She also understands as well as he does how the patent system works. The nanotechnology in the vials can't be dismissed either. These issues need to be resolved quickly so appropriate treatments can be devised. Gilthorpe and those like him need to open their minds and help find solutions.

Expand full comment
DrLatusDextro's avatar

"The virus may not have been isolated to the purity standards some might like, but it has been isolated to a sufficient standard."

Science, references, citations please? ;-)

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts