From here:
Information War About the COVID Shots (blubrry.com)
“Whistleblower Report – Dr. Mike Yeadon, former Pfizer VP and Chief Scientist (Respiratory) Worldwide, and Dr. Jonathan Gilthorpe, experienced cell and molecular biologist, discuss the many claims about the ingredients in the COVID shots and help to provide clarity on how to make sense of all this conflicting information.”
My cliff notes:
Information on how patents work – C19 treatment patents can be updates of past patents, not patents granted ahead of C19 to treat C19.
The virus may not have been isolated to the purity standards some might like, but it has been isolated to a sufficient standard.
Graphene/graphene oxide case is not yet strong enough to suggest it is deliberately inserted into vaccines.
Key point – we do not know what is in the vials – so much variability.
Marburg and Ebola sequences in the vials? What’s the next pandemic? Only 50% of the contents of the Pfizer injection contain 50% RNA – full string, anything shorter is invalid. EMA dropped the standard, no other medicine ever released has been approved with only half of it present. “Dirtiness” = hiding micro- RNA – regulates protein – would be possible to hide something like cancer causing agents etc. Uknown side effects? Malign agent could act to hide harmful toxins.
Adenoviral vector JnJ /Janssen coded for Marburg. Same viral vector as C19 injection. Listed in the patent, but nothing to do with the final product. Refer to product information sheet. Faith in regulatory process has been shattered. We don’t know what’s in the vaccines – too much variability amongst batches.
Vaccines to treat Marburg and Ebola have patents for techniques – not the Marburg and Ebola viruses themselves. A vector thac be expressed in a protein in a cell.
How much mRNA in the shots in any given batch? EMA technical staff very troubled by Pfizer – exhibit batches were not consistent – down from 70%, EMA dropped the standard to 50% - absurd to allow this.
Only 50% of the genetic material in the vials was defined. No-one knows what the broken – non-full length – pieces will do. Dead sequences? We just don’t know. Normally required to have 99% purity – dropping to 50%?!!!! No idea of what the other 50% consists of. Criminal behaviour.
Based on Nuremburg trials – war crimes – human experimentation – Helsinki Accord – no person should be experimented on without their informed consent.
C19 injections are experimented on. Phase 3 clinical trial is still experimental. Nothing has been said by governments or the media.
Do medical testing to see whether adverse events are developing.
Onwards!
Please upgrade to paid, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - Buying just one Ko-Fi a week for $3 is 50 bucks more than an annual $100 subscription!
The interview clarified a few things for me. Also, thanks for your concise summary. I think Dr Gilthorpe was too dismissive of no virus group and to suggest they're manipulative and somehow twisting the facts is false, i.e. re isolation/purification process. It's either pure or impure, "pure enough" is a ridiculous concept. Info. on patents was useful. Karen Kingston and Dr Gilthorpe should debate this openly. KK is sticking to her guns, including re. paper she claims shows proof of GO and that Gilmore claims is simply about coating to enhance imaging techniques or something like that. She also understands as well as he does how the patent system works. The nanotechnology in the vials can't be dismissed either. These issues need to be resolved quickly so appropriate treatments can be devised. Gilthorpe and those like him need to open their minds and help find solutions.
"The virus may not have been isolated to the purity standards some might like, but it has been isolated to a sufficient standard."
Science, references, citations please? ;-)