In 2021, CDC concealed data that showed “vaccine” effectiveness was 33% for Delta (below the 50% threshold necessary to continue emergency use authorization) - instead it claimed 80% - pushed boosters

Let’s set the scene with a teaser from (and a tribute to) the great work done by Del Bigtree, the Highwire and ICAN.

“"It is hard to see this as anything other than a failure of our health authorities to assess, share, make public, and act upon valuable, real-world data in the midst of a so-called pandemic," Del Bigtree, founder of the network, told The Epoch Times via email. "And without FOIA, the public likely would never be made aware of these failures which, of course, allows them to be perpetrated again and again."

Let’s also put the below in the context of countries around the world rolling out boosters, either without conducting their own similar research, or not being made aware of the research on “vaccine effectiveness”.

Now ask “why did the WHO not do this research of have access to it?”

And note the defence of the guilty, Silence. “The FDA and CDC declined to comment.”

Silence is consent to the changes to the International Health Regulations that will force people to put up with BS like this, BS that kills, maims and siphons hundreds of billions of bucks to bug Pharma whilst killing and maiming the vulnerable, the aged and the infirm.

Silence is the “go to” modus operandi of the guilty. “I will take the 5^th”.

From here:

FDA, CDC Hid Data on Spike in COVID Cases Among the Vaccinated: Documents | The Epoch Times

“Humetrix Cloud Services was contracted by the U.S. military to analyze vaccine data. The company performed a fresh analysis as authorities considered in 2021 whether COVID-19 vaccine boosters were necessary amid studies finding waning vaccine effectiveness.”

“The cohort analysis was completed on 20 million Medicare beneficiaries, including 5.6 million seniors who received a primary series of a COVID-19 vaccine.”

“Humetrix also found that among the beneficiaries, there had been 133,000 cases, 27,000 hospitalizations, and 8,300 intensive care admissions among the fully vaccinated since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.”

This data was presented to the CDC in August 2021 and the FDA a month later.

A key component of “checks and balances” that we all assume are present to safeguard us from harm.

“For the week ending on July 31, 2021, post-vaccination COVID-19 cases represented 73 percent of the cases among people 65 and older, the company found. The elderly were 80 percent fully vaccinated at the time.”

Interesting that the military had people over 65, but leave that aside for now.

Okay, this gets to the “effective” aspect of the “safe and effective” narrative, that was assumed to be “safe and effective” FACT.

It could be that 73 percent of “cases” for the over 65;s with 80% “vaccinated” meant that “vaccines” were at least preventing 7% of “cases”.

Let’s go on.

“Breakthrough infection rates were higher among those who were vaccinated early, the researchers found. They estimated that the rates were twice as high in those who had been vaccinated five to six months prior, when compared to people vaccinated three to four months before.”

Okay, those injected from Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) early (from January 2021 to February 2021?) were twice as likely to be infected than those injected later (from April 2021 to June 2021?).

A clear sign of waning effectiveness.

Now for hospitalizations:

“Protection against hospitalization was also fading, researchers discovered.

In the week ending on July 31, 2021, 63 percent of the COVID-19 hospitalizations in seniors were among the fully vaccinated, according to the documents. The same pattern of weaker protection among people who were vaccinated early was found.”

No numbers on the percent injected, but it was probably greater than 80% by July 31, 2021 – maybe 90%. With a 63% hospitalization rate, some might argue that the “vaccines” were 27% effective at preventing hospitalizations. We don’t know what people were hospitalized for of course, but let’s assume it was all C19 related.

“Researchers calculated that the vaccine effectiveness (VE) against infection was just 33 percent while the effectiveness against hospitalization had dropped to 57 percent.”

Here’s where the plot thickens. 33% VE compared to a requirement of 50% for EUA. This should have been a milestone for the experiment – “how long does any effectiveness last?”.

The milestone is crucial to set against the decision to go the mRNA route in the first place – a decision taken a year or more earlier – in May 2020 or earlier.

Back to this snippet “Humetrix also found that among the beneficiaries, there had been 133,000 cases, 27,000 hospitalizations, and 8,300 intensive care admissions among the fully vaccinated since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.”

"Our observational study VE findings show a very significant decrease in VE against infection and hospitalization in the Delta phase of the pandemic for individuals vaccinated with either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine for those 5–6 months post vaccination vs. those 3–4 months post vaccination," Dr. Bettina Experton, Humetrix's president and CEO, said in a Sept. 15, 2021, email to top U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials.”

September 2021 – a report on the ineffectiveness of the “vaccines” against the Delta strain, but then there’s this also:

“Dr. Experton disclosed that Humetrix shared the data with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in August 2021.”

Now, here’s the bombshell.

“The CDC held a meeting with its vaccine advisers on Aug. 30, 2021. During the meeting, CDC officials went over emerging data on waning vaccine effectiveness. But the military study was not included.”

Not included. A study of 20 million people. Not included. What did the CDC present instead?

“The CDC did present (pdf) data from COVID-NET, one of its systems, that showed effectiveness against COVID-19-associated hospitalization was falling among the elderly since the emergence of the Delta variant but that data still showed 80 percent effectiveness.”

Instead of presenting data showing the 33% effectiveness discovered by Humetrix, it presented data from its own systems. How accurate was that data and how much of it was populated by data from big Pharma – AND – how much attention was being paid to VAERS (and V-Safe?) data???

It gets worse.

“The FDA held a similar meeting on Sept. 17, 2021. The CDC participated. The Humetrix analysis was also not presented during that meeting.”

The closing paragraph of the Epoch Times article reads:

“The FDA ended up clearing a Pfizer booster for many Americans.

The CDC advised most people to receive it.

The agencies later expanded booster clearance and recommendations to virtually all Americans aged 5 and older, with Moderna's shot as another option.

Authorities have since replaced the old shots due to their lack of durability, and are preparing to roll out another slate of shots this fall.”

Angry much?

The Who - Won't Get Fooled Again (Shepperton Studios / 1978) - YouTube

Onwards!

Please buy a subscription or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 coffee a week!