“In the United States during summer, the observed warming is much weaker than that produced by all 36 climate models surveyed here” - ALL climate models used to predict climate are BOGUS

From here:

Global Warming: Observations vs. Climate Models | The Heritage Foundation

“KEY TAKEAWAYS

1.      The observed rate of global warming over the past 50 years has been weaker than that predicted by almost all computerized climate models.

2.      Climate models that guide energy policy do not even conserve energy, a necessary condition for any physically based model of the climate system.

3.      Public policy should be based on climate observations—which are rather unremarkable—rather than climate models that exaggerate climate impacts.

Lots of charts and analysis in the paper.

 A big h/t to William Briggs who provides a commentary in his own inimitable style here:

(100) Great News! The Climate Is Much Better Than Predicted. Now We Can Calm Down! (substack.com)

A few bits of chart candy from the first link here:

Check out the NOTE at the bottom of the chart, the red line predicted by climate models and the solid line of actual observed temperatures. The climate models are hopeless even when they are tested against predictions of past data USING PAST DATA to predict data within the historical data set!

This one is a doozy - 36 climate models v reality expressed in degrees Celsius per decade.

The predictions of 36 climate models v outcome. In case you missed it, the outcome is the grey bar right at the bottom!

The BOGUS climate models are amongst many other lies, obfuscations and omissions (like the impact of the sun, clouds and seismic activity) that the BOGUS models produce and which have cost taxpayers trillions of dollars in subsidies, taxes and inflation.

Remember, it is the objective of the Cult of Moloch to make people poor, sick, hungry, uneducated, sexualized and increasingly impoverished with inflation and ever higher taxes. What they can’t get from individuals they will borrow in debt markets to further push nations into increased bankruptcy.

The first part of conclusion of the paper has this:

“Climate models produce too much warming when compared to observations over the past fifty years or so, which is the period of most rapid warming and increases in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

The discrepancy ranges from over 40 percent for global surface air temperature, about 50 percent for global lower atmospheric temperatures, and even a factor of two to three for the United States in the summertime.

This discrepancy is never mentioned when those same models are used as the basis for policy decisions.”

You can read more about the “bogusity” of the climate models, the folly of pursuing “Net Zero” and the impracticality of “renewables” here:

(100) Updated compilation of articles that debunk the “climate crisis” mantra -showing the utter folly of spending tens of trillions whilst allowing millions to die of disease and hunger (all ID'd/injected) (substack.com)

“Net Zero” = bogus measures for bogus outcomes that result in real costs to real people – ESPEICALLY THE POOR, THE ELDERLY AND THE INFIRM!!!

Onwards!

Please subscribe or donate via Ko-fi – any amount from 3 bucks upwards. Don’t worry and God Bless, if you can’t or don’t want to. Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 Ko-fi donation a week!