Is it possible to reverse spike protein damage and counteract the effects of the adulteration and contamination of the modified mRNA injections? We need our own version of “Event 201" for Disease X

Event 201 will go down in history as the major success of the Cult of Moloch to inflict tens of millions of deaths and billions of harms on an unsuspecting human population. It sentenced humanity to an unprecedented period of deprivation, poverty, trauma and excited misery from which we are tentatively emerging,

The perpetrators still walk the streets with impunity and plan for more of the same – with the “whataboutism” of Disease X.

To counter the evil that infests the “upper echelons” of politics and world health, we need our own equivalent. Of course, laws can be changed and ignoring what is set down by the Cult is an option, After all, “nobody wants the steenking vaccines”.

But how can we counter “Disease X”? Will it take the form of “Global Warming” or “preventing nano-plastics” (that is banning hydrocarbon suage) or “alcohol”, “smoking”, “obesity”? I think we realise that the cancers caused by the experimental C19 mRNA injections will not be called a public health emergency any time soon.

I set down below how I view a possible framework for a solution to the problem of the C19 scamdemic and future attempts to “rule the world”.

There can be no doubt that the C19 mRNA injections are a weapon. A deadly one. It has been “fired” by an enemy of humanity itself. The spike protein is entirely synthetic, artificial, man-made. Just like a nuclear missile.

It used the same principle as used by poisonous reptiles and sea creatures to manufacture a poison out of whole cloth. The fact that it “leaked” from a lab in Wuhan is coincidental to the fact that these venoms are being developed in labs round the wrold. The spike protein probably exists in labs in Europe, Asia and the Americas.

The WHO has failed to cure any killer disease over decades – from Ebola, to TB, to malaria, to cholera and now C19. It will always fail because it thinks that vaccines are the only possible prevention or cure. Now it seeks to mandate its failed model into the law of every country via changes and new international health regu;ations in a few weeks time,

Rather than sponsoring research on anti-venom, the WHO wants to control all future synthetic venoms. The spike protein is a man-made venom. The WHO supports its injection into people using a modified mRNA platform with horrible quality.

So, let’s think about how to protect ourselves and treat the wounds it inflicts.

Introducing “Health 101”.

It takes the form of a matrix that addresses each phase of the murderous intent of the Cult. It does not address propaganda and censorship – though the effects of counteracting the murderous Cult campaigns will be the same.

Here we go – set in the context of the existing public health emergency of the harms inflicted on survivors of the genocide perpetrated by the Cult.

No individual can complete this task. We ned a real WHO with lots of taxpayer funding and access to vast research resources. The World Council for Health looks like an embryonic organization that can plan, lead, organize and control a real world health organisation, but it is in its infancy ad needs 100 or a thousand times its resources to counter the lies of the WEF and WHO – plus plant real medics inside national health regulators and administrators who are not “slaves to the vaccine” model.

The spike protein is associated with much of the damage caused over the scamdemic. The delivery of the spike protein looks to be an airborne “virus” – that could have been restricted to local areas, but for the injection of a different larger spike protein in the experimental C19 modified mRNA injections. The swapping of one airborne delivery mechanism for an injection mechanism.

Th freedom movement needs to become part of the zeitgeist, like the hippy anti-war movement of the 60’s and emerge from an albeit large fringe movement.

As a layman, I view the path to curing the many damaging components of the disease and the injections by using a lens of four-dimensional matrices – pathogen/chemical, prevention of effect, treatment of symptoms and time to manifest.

These four aspects accelerate what was a natural aging process and decelerate the ability to procreate.

Foor each of those aspects, there are treatments that might prevent, stabilise or even cure a symptom.

Here are the theoretical ingredients and a discussion of their possible harms:

Pfizer-BioNTech's COVID-19 Vaccine Ingredients (health.com)

Lots of chemicals – all of which are “spun” as no more harmful than the harmful effects of other vaccines in general use.

This of course is the theory. It is not what was in the gene modification injections. The manufacturers of the injections have repeatedly proven their incompetence, fraud and corruption in NOT sticking to those ingredients by adulterating the connections and using processes that result in adulteration of the connections.

So, another axis of the matrix is the representation of each of the known ingredients and also the contaminants and the added components that adulterated them.

Another azis is the manifestation of harms in organs, limbs, skin, bones and blood. And circulatory systems

That is, the modified mRNA needs to be broken down into its components of pseudomurein, (rather than uridine) the messenger and the RNA – for quality and intent.

Then there is e-coli contamination, then the SV40, promoter/enabler adulteration, the DNA contamination, spider web adulteration, endotoxins and so on.

Perhaps there is a way to represent these harmful aspects in the same way Kevin McKernan did here:

Sequencing of bivalent Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines reveals nanogram to microgram quantities of expression vector dsDNA per dose (substack.com)

Which brings us to treatments that prevent, stabilize and cure the “delivery mechanism, the spike venom and the known components of the “vaccine” plus the adulterations and contaminants.

From here:

I wonder if biochemists with expertise in treating diseases can work out any useful commonalities of the mechanism of action of these molecules in attacking spike protein? (substack.com)

There was this table:

These treatments are just some of those that might work, not an exhaustive list. Others such as Choline Dioxide (ClO2) and nicotine (C₁₀H₁₄N₂) might be even better!

Each of these treatments has a “mechanism of action” that addresses one or more of the components of the experimental C19 mRNA injections – most seem to focus on the spike protein. The “mad scientists” are developing other delivery mechanisms that bypass “informed consent” such as self-replicating airborne/aerosol delivery. Of “treatments” that evolve in the same way as the variants of the spike protein/virus evolved with injections forced the evolution of the “virus” - so would aerosol delivery).

The amount of time taken for these cures and treatments is a little fuzzy and varies at the individual level.

I ask myself questions like “what would the ACE-2 receptor be doing if no C19 was around?” in the context of not “cutting off my foot, because my toes were hurting!”.

I read the words, but do not comprehend the meaning of papers like this one:

ACE2 Cell Biology, Regulation, and Physiological Functions - PMC (nih.gov)

Which I try and reconcile with the more than 4,000 studies on C19 treatment and prevention here: COVID-19 early treatment: real-time analysis of 4,068 studies (c19early.org)

As with all treatments, the interaction of one treatment with another is vital and could be yet another axis in the matrix!

Onwards!!!

Please subscribe ten dollars a month or annually for 100 bucks. You can also donate via Ko-fi – any amount from three dollars upwards. Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan