Joshua Guetzkow, PhD, Retsef Levi, PhD, Christine Stabell Benn, MD, PhD and Tracy Beth Høeg, MD, PhD, discuss the failures of regulators, the C19 mRNA injection manufacturing process 1 and 2, 90 mins
For me, the regulatory failures over the release of the UNSAFE and INEFFECTIVE mRNA injections reveal the continued FAILURE of the mRNA platform in its entirety AND call into question ALL the systems and methods used to “approve” vaccines in general.
I doubt that an appropriate level of science and medicine has been applied to all of the vaccines currently on vaccine schedules for adverse events over the short, medium and long term (1-3 years, 3-7 years and >7 years).
Much of the discussion is around regulatory failures and the abandonment of best practise evolved over decades in order to achieve “warp speed”.
One issue that was raised was that because the C19 mRNA injections were experimental, the level of safety testing and proof should have been elevated post authorisation – it was actually reduced. A point made was that close comparisons could and should have been made to a placebo v those being injected across many demographics – in the months following authorization. This was not done by anyone – an opportunity lost.
As of now, only Heath Canada has reacted to the bombshell information that has the world in shock – that a different product was injected to that trialled and that the different product contained horrible levels of contamination with endotoxins, DNA and unneeded SV40 promoters – all on top of the already toxic delivery mechanism of MODIFIED (not natural) miRNA, PEG coatings of lipid nano-particles and so on.
Here is the link to the video and a short description – lots of useful links:
“127,365 views Oct 22, 2023
What does this mean, how did this happen and what next? In this episode of "Sensibly curious about vaccines", to talk about what they discovered in relation to the changes in the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine manufacturing process that happened in the fall of 2020.
We talk bias and lack of regulatory oversight from the FDA and EMA, what Pfizer may not have disclosed about the vaccine contents, what we know about the contents and safety of the "process 2" batches that the public received, the history of harms from vaccines rolled out with inadequate safety testing, the importance of transparency and how independent research, uncensored discussion and legal actions may offer solutions.
Links to relevant literature: Drs. Guetzkow and Levi's BMJ rapid response about process 1 and 2: https://www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o.... Dr. Guetzkow's Twitter thread on the process switch: https://x.com/joshg99/status/16584211.... Dr. Guetzkow's blog post on the CDC's safety signal analysis:
https://researchrebel.substack.com/p/...
. On the higher frequency of adverse events in process 2 batches: https://dailyclout.io/pfizer-process-.... The Ontario Preprint showing SV40 promoter in Pfizer mRNA vaccines: https://osf.io/mjc97/.
A good timeline of the events:
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/prod...
Dr. Guetzkow's project on censorship and suppression of scientists and doctors who raise safety concerns about vaccines:
https://researchrebel.substack.com/p/...
and his paper on censorship and suppression of COVID-19 heterodoxy: https://link.springer.com/article/10.....”
Onwards
Please subscribe or make a donation via ko-fi. “God Bless You” if you can’t or don’t want to.
Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 ko-fi donation a week!
Everyone should go back and watch Judy Mikovits video from two and three years ago. She told us of the toxic crap they put in these shots. Now for some reason people want to say the same thing Judy said years ago. Why not look at her videos and test for what she says. I would hate to see another 3 years go by and people repeat again what she orginally said.
Peter - your first 2 paragraphs sum it up quite well and I couldn't agree more with what you said. Let me just put it this way: my husband, who I've talked about before (spent many yrs working in PA Dept of Health, advising public and medical community, govt. etc. on how to manage epidemics, pandemics etc.) and who has over 50 yrs virology/immunology research as well as working with a Nobel prize winning top notch scientist on her research team) used to help to develop vaccines back in 1970s. He quit after a few years though because he found out what was really being put in them:
SV40 - cancer virus from monkeys. He also quit taking any jabs because they didn't work. In fact, none of the scientists who he worked with got the flu jab because they didn't work. His reaction to the mRNA being used in jabs was immediate horror and it just got worse the more he found out. That right there, should tell us everything we need to know but when you add it to what you said in the first 2 paragraphs of this article, that should make everyone run screaming from the room and vow never to get jabbed again. I also know another scientist and he worked for DOD but quit and became a whistleblower when he found out some shady things. To this day he's still under a gag order and can't tell anyone what he knows. All of this tells us something is very, very wrong with the jabs and those "regulatory" agencies who are supposed to regulate, run trials, etc. but are not doing any of that.