Long C19 debunked in the young: the stable overall number of cases over time, fails to recognise (almost 100%) turnover of the young within the overall number of cases
From here:
Natural course of health and well-being in non-hospitalised children and young people after testing for SARS-CoV-2: A prospective follow-up study over 12 months - The Lancet Regional Health – Europe
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(22)00250-2/fulltext
From the study (CYP = children and young people)
“This unique study finds that in most CYP, specific adverse symptoms reported at testing and 6-months later had resolved by 12-months, although in a minority they were persistent, and that new-onset had emerged.
If we had simply looked at cross-sectional prevalence of adverse symptoms at testing, 6-months and 12-months, as is commonly done in other studies, it would have appeared as if the prevalence of specific common post-COVID-symptoms stayed largely stable, or increased, over time.
However, we show that this is not the case. The new-onset adverse symptoms arising 6- or 12-months after initial viral infection should not exclusively be viewed as new long COVID symptoms as a consequence of the initial SARS-COV-2 infection. Rather, these adverse symptoms should be seen in the wider context of health and well-being in the general adolescent population.
Recent reviews of Long COVID in CYP indicate that higher quality studies are needed and that a consistent definition of Long COVID is required; our research goes one step further and indicates that studies with repeat measurement on the same CYP are needed to track individual trajectories and not simply report repeat cross-sectional prevalence's of symptoms over time.”
Vinay Prasad has a 10 minute video here:
Cross Sectional Studies FAIL For LONG COVID | Amazing new Lancet Paper! - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCi9Xpag4FM
No mention of any “vaccine” dosage, or temporal connection. Maybe the kids were all unvaxxed.
My opinion about "long covid" (it doesn't exist at all): https://freedommovement.substack.com/p/long-covid-does-not-exist
In Prasad's video he makes the assumption that one of the positive indicators of being infected with the Sars-Cov2 virus is the loss of taste and smell. I once read a claim that if the probe used to test for Sars-Cov2 was stuck too far up your nose it could damage a nerve right below your brain that regulated your ability to smell and that if you lost your ability to smell it would affect your ability to taste food and one could check this out by just holding your nose while tasting food. Would like to hear opinions on this from this audience.