Maybe this is “stirring the pot” too vigorously – here’s a question for adherents to the Islamic faith – “infidels” are viewed as “unclean” and the Chinese hate Uyghurs - so...
Why would someone adhering to Islam tolerate the injection of DNA contaminants and bacteria from “infidels” plus snippets of a monkey virus enabler/promoter = making a poor quality “steenking vaccine”, possibly using the stem cells of aborted foetuses of “infidels”, tolerate the forced injection of experimental C19 modified mRNA injections?
And tolerate the WHO to impose a ban on religions exemptions in a pandemic treaty and international health regulations – because the WHO says “one size fits all” and Bill Gates says “the whole world MUST be “vaccinated””?
I don’t get it - help needed!
The largest vaccine manufacturers in the world are in India – not a friend either, especially in Pakistan.
The Chinese are also key supporters of the WHO’s “one size fits all” – One World – approach. They are not exactly friends of the Uyghurs in China, right?
Maybe this is stirring the pot too much, but I am curious.
Thoughts – especially from those of the Islamic faith welcome!
Onwards!
Please subscribe or donate via Ko-fi – any amount from 3 bucks upwards. Don’t worry and God Bless, if you can’t or don’t want to. Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 Ko-fi donation a week!
Most people just don't think, is why. This is reportedly worse (can you imagine!) outside of the comparatively-educated central/northern European und US bubble. No clue about Japan, just mentioning them to be fair.
I have a read a good deal about the Uyghur situation and have come to doubt the "genocide" narrative quite a bit. Don't have a reading list at hand right now, but the originator of the genocide claims seems to have a conflict of interest and shoddy methodology for his assessment and there are some striking disparities between the observable reality on the ground on the descriptions given of concentration/internment camps. As you may have guessed, I am no fan of the Chinese government. This is rather something for the "played by both sides" files, in your parlance :)
The short answer is top down hierarchy is the way uptake is assured.
.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10943-023-01798-4. Hamid (2019) mentioned that some previous studies have focused more on the provision of immunization from an Islamic perspective. This is because there are extensive questions from Muslims in the general population about the halal status of vaccines. Moreover, there are controversies about vaccines that are said to cause other diseases such as paralysis, autism, and weakening of the immune system. Although the provision of immunization is controversial, it is in line with the requirements of Islam which allow the authorities to make significant policies based on the principle of public interest or maslaha of the entire society (Ramli et al., 2019).
However, the question raised in this study is why there are Malaysian that reject COVID-19 vaccines even though it is permissible and not against the Islamic perspective? To answer the question, this study identifies and analyses the themes that dominate the discussion on COVID-19 vaccines’ halal status by conducting a content analysis research method.
And USA-https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/news/article/muslim-vaccine-response
And lastly-https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fitd.2021.788188/full. The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused health, economic, and social challenges globally. Under these circumstances, effective vaccines play a critical role in saving lives, improving population health, and facilitating economic recovery. In Muslim-majority countries, Islamic jurisprudence, which places great importance on sanctity and safety of human life and protection of livelihoods, may influence vaccine uptake. Efforts to protect humans, such as vaccines, are highly encouraged in Islam. However, concerns about vaccine products’ Halal (permissible to consume by Islamic law) status and potential harm can inhibit acceptance. Fatwa councils agree that vaccines are necessary in the context of our current pandemic; receiving a COVID-19 vaccination is actually a form of compliance with Sharia law. Broader use of animal component free reagents during manufacturing may further increase acceptance among Muslims. We herein explain the interplay between Sharia (Islamic law) and scientific considerations in addressing the challenge of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, particularly in Muslim populations.