Ironic.
From here:
NASA's Perseverance rover produces oxygen on Mars | Live Science
“NASA's Perseverance rover has generated 4.3 ounces of breathable oxygen while on the Red Planet — enough to sustain an adult human for three hours.
The rover, which first touched down on Mars in February 2021, produced the element using its Mars Oxygen In-Situ Resource Utilization Experiment (MOXIE) device — which generated the oxygen by converting carbon dioxide in periodic bouts over two years.
Since arriving on the Red Planet, the microwave-size device has generated 4.3 ounces (122 grams) of oxygen, according to NASA. This is equivalent to what a small dog breathes in 10 hours and gives scientists hope that human life could, one day, be sustained on the inhospitable planet.”
“Carbon dioxide is abundant on Mars, making up 95% of its thin atmosphere, according to NASA. By zapping small amounts of carbon dioxide over 16 experiments, the MOXIE device stripped oxygen atoms from CO2 and analyzed them for purity before sequestering them safely within a capsule. The leftovers were then emitted in the form of carbon monoxide.”
Well, would you look at that. Maybe the climate chicken littles could raise a bunch of taxes and build a few billion MOXIE’s on planet Earth.
Of course, it rather begs the question whether NASA could have planted a few tree seeds – after all there is water on Mars, right?
Is There Water on Mars? We Asked a NASA Scientist | NASA
Well, water ice + CO2 – so maybe a new species is needed – one that can access sunlight whilst allowing its oxygen to be captured – a little far fetched but surely not beyond the capability of scientists that can split a few CO2 molecules into O2 and CO?
Anyways, the folks at NASA are “chuffed to bits”.
“"MOXIE's impressive performance shows that it is feasible to extract oxygen from Mars' atmosphere — oxygen that could help supply breathable air or rocket propellant to future astronauts," Pamela Melroy, NASA's deputy administrator, said in the statement.
"Developing technologies that let us use resources on the Moon and Mars is critical to build a long-term lunar presence, create a robust lunar economy, and allow us to support an initial human exploration campaign to Mars."
Reminds me of the story about the problems of writing using ink pens in the weightless state of the upper atmosphere. The Americans struggled, the Russians used… a pencil.
Onwards!
Please buy a subscription or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 coffee a week!
Will the taxpayer ever benefit from this "INVESTMENT" used as the new buzz word for taxes. despite what you call it it all comes out of our pockets. it may be good to know that my great great great grandson may be able to breath on mars but it wont fill my belly down hear. Musk has proven that competition is what is needed to concur space.. it seems that the billions spent putting up satellites offer profits to companies hear on earth that use the items that we as citizens that bore the cost to put them up have no benefit from their existence. oh we may get an early warning for a storm but cant afford the insurance to rebuild our homes because of the taxes or investments we are forced to make. we make the assumption that only government is big enough to make it into space. well Mr. Musk has shown them different. what was the problem? well it was governments claim on space as their own. Musk thumbed his nose and told them I am doing it anyway. now they are coming to him to get things launched. he has provided the incentive that comes from people with the drive to succeed and not people that got their jobs by having a piece of paper that proves they are smart. I applauded his actions because I am one of the people that succeeded with my own efforts and not because I had a degree in underwater basket weaving.--------- I, Grampa
At what cost to the taxpayer ? Or, was this a private/public partnership where again the taxpayer gets the bill? Hmmmm...makes me think of the 20years and approx 30 seconds Lawremce Livermore National Laboratory produced nuclear fusion at a cost ofs $6 billion to the tax payer. Do the globalists really thing they can change the DNA of mankind enough that he will breathe CO2? Hmmmm...reading the article from LLNL wondering if those high-powered lasers were used recently on Maui?