Observations on Nobel Prizes, Fauci ethics award, Blue Cross Blue Shield injection incentive payments, legality of London’s emissions zone, a packed UK Parliament debates BDS
Let’s start with a quick comment on the Nobel Prize winners. I find it disappointing that the winners of the prize have remained silent about their “invention” of the use of pseudo uridine and lipid nano particles (LNP’s) that invade the nucleus of cells at a time when regulators and health authorities insisted this was not possible. Their views on contaminated doses using their Prize winning technology would be valuable if only to confirm that their invention could be easily scaled up for use in the manufacture of billions of doses.
How poisonous are LNP’s and pseudo-uridines? Well, the scientific jury is out for definitive proof of adverse events – the point is that these are experimental in a mass roll-out of injections. There is no proof that they are harmless either – they are experimental.
From here:
“The team found a way to modify mRNA to be less inflammatory—replacing uridine, one of its building block molecules, with a similar molecule called pseudo uridine. They also developed a more efficient delivery system that used lipid nanoparticles to protect the mRNA and help it to enter cells for protein production.”
The two scientists, Karikó and Weissman began studying in vitro synthetic mRNA technology in the 1990s, when they worked together at the University of Pennsylvania. They are not to blame for the contaminated liquids in the doses transported into cells via the pseudo-uridine and LNP vehicles.
Next up. Fauci and his ethics award.
“Fauci will also receive a cash prize for his "achievement."
As a reminder, from here: Christine Grady - Wikipedia Christine Grady is Fauci’s wife and “.. is an American nurse and bioethicist who serves as the head of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.”
“The Inamori International Center for Ethics and Excellence at Case Western Reserve University will award Dr. Anthony Fauci with its Inamori Ethics Prize, an annual honor given to international leaders "whose actions and influence have greatly improved the condition of humankind."
How small is the “ethics world”? 20 nationally significant ethicists? Enquiring minds want to know how influential the wife was in the prize being awarded, either from past conversations at “conferences” via leverage as a post holder in the NIH, or from previous research grants to an institution making the award that insisted on vaxx mandates for its students and faculty (how many died or were harmed by this mandate?)
Next up. Blue Cross Blue Shield incentive payments to doctors.
(100) The Incentivized Mass Murder of Children - by Greg Reese (substack.com)
“BCBS offers bounties for injecting toxins. "Blue Cross Blue Shield rules say that a doctor needs to vaccinate sixty-three percent of their patients in order to qualify." "The average American paediatrician has about fifteen hundred patients and would have to have nine hundred and forty-five of them fully vaccinated in order to get paid. At forty-thousand for every hundred this works out to three-hundred and sixty thousand dollars."
Enquiring minds want to know why BCBS is offering such incentives. Does it believe it lowers health care costs or is someone paying it even more money to offer the incentives. Maybe the Federal government via one of its three letter health agencies? Is it one or all of the big pharma companies? Domestic or foreign?
Moving on. A major blow to the challenge to the legality of London’s Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) as a judge determines that the actions of Transport for London and the London mayor, Sadiq Khan, acted within the bounds of existing legislation.
A little more background here in 2020:
Transport for London secures £1.8bn government bailout | TfL | The Guardian
Just the other day, from here:
Council loses ULEZ court fight against Sadiq Khan and forced to pay £147,000 | ITV News London
And here:
Council loses ULEZ court fight against Sadiq Khan and forced to pay £147,000 | ITV News London
“Justice Jonathan Swift said in his judgement the Mayor had the lawful power to order the expansion of the ULEZ.”
He wrote: "The Mayor’s decision to confirm the 2022 Order as a variation of the existing charging scheme is consistent with his powers under Schedule 23 to the 1999 Act, and does not give rise to breach of any obligation imposed under that schedule."
Let’s see if mayors in other cities engage in copy cat measures now that the legality of ULEZ has been tested against legislation drafter almost a quarter of a century ago for an entirely different purpose.
Still, maybe just a hint of some respite.
“On the £160 million scrappage scheme, which all Londoners with a non-compliant vehicle (broadly pre-2005 petrol and pre-2015 diesel) are entitled to a £2,000 grant from), the judgement concluded: "There has not, and could not plausibly be, any suggestion that Transport for London was required to formulate the consultation question on the scrappage scheme in any different way.”
Last but not least, if you want to know what actually does motivate the UK’s House of Commins part of Parliament to purr all 650 bums on seats, it turns out it is the lifting of the prohibition of anti-Israel policies – also known as Boycott, Divest and Sanction (BDS), a pet project of the US Goon squad and Ilhan Omar.
From here:
UK’s Anti-BDS Bill Ignites Controversy in the Heart of Conservative Party (msn.com)
“The cause of this ideological dispute is the UK government's bill (The Economic Activity of Public Bodies (Overseas Matters) Bill) banning public bodies from boycotting Israel, a legislation that has drawn fierce criticism from an unlikely quarter: the Conservative Members of Parliament (MPs).
The bill is designed to curb the reach of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, a global campaign promoting various forms of boycott against Israel and Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.”
Compare and contrast the debating chamber of the House of Commons for this bill
And this one of the same chamber when asking why hundreds of thousands of more Brits than expected have been dying over the last few years.
You can see where the interests of members of Parliament lie – all about virtue signalling with no virtue on dismay.
Onwards!
Please subscribe or make a donation via ko-fi. “God Bless You” if you can’t or don’t want to.
Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 ko-fi donation a week!
Gee, where is my reward for losing my job instead of jabbing? Oh, I get to live? I guess I'll have to live with that. I guess I don't need a cash prize. Is the cash prize in dollars? I already have a year's worth of toilet paper saved up.
Mr. Halligan: GREAT question re: was the wife involved in the "ethics award" to Dr. Fraudchi? I love the questions you ask, they're always real thought-provokers. Sadly, too few folks ever ask those kind of probing questions but they need to be asked - and answered.