Partial cross post from Sage Hana’s SubStack – Using the RT-PCR test to falsely promulgate the C19 scamdemic (fake testdemic)

From here:

The Best Succinct Comment I have ever seen on PCR (substack.com)

I am unable to cross-post, maybe the feature is turned off or yu have to be a paid subscriber.

Here is the comment – which comes after context from Sage Hana

“First they assassinated the inventor of the PCR machine Kary Mullis. He invented the machine to produce billions of copies of a particular DNA sequence quickly and cheaply. It was designed to be used for; evolutionary biology to study minute amounts of DNA extracted from the fossil remains of ancient species; forensic analysis of traces of blood, semen, or strands of hair left at a crime scene; gene sequencing; and in genetic engineering to replicate the gene sequence to be installed by inserting the resulting copies into viruses that are finally injected into the target organism. Once Mullis was dead, his strong opposition to using his machine as a diagnostic tool was mostly eliminated. All that's left are some videos of his opposition to diagnostic use of his machine. His powerful personality and his hatred of Fauci would have put a huge kink in rolling out the plan-demic.

As for the misuse of PCR to diagnose COVID infection, Mullis explained, if you run enough cycles, you can find anything you want to find. Over 30 cycles is considered too many for any sort of diagnosis. In the COVID tests 35 to 40 cycles were used. Each cycle doubles the DNA sequence that is being magnified. So, 2 to the 35th power is 34,359,738,368. Or 2 to the 40th power is 1,099,511,627,776. That's over one trillion or a thousand billions!!!

Since the PCR uses material in the sample to construct copies of the DNA sequence that is being looked for (or copied), with enough cycles, and some DNA in the sample, virtually any sequence can be produced. To really understand this you need to know that there are only four different DNA nucleotides that make up all DNA sequences. Each nucleotide is defined by a specific nitrogenous base: adenine (often abbreviated "A" in science writing), thymine (abbreviated "T"), guanine (abbreviated "G"), and cytosine (abbreviated "C"). So, by breaking down random DNA in the sample (which is part of the PCR process), the sequence being looked for can be constructed out of the 4 specific nitrogenous base materials that are found in virtually all DNA samples.

When a small number of cycles are run, it may be possible to infer that a particular sequence actually existed right from the start, but when many cycles are run the chances that random DNA nucleotides have been used to produce the desired sequence becomes more and more difficult to sort out. That's because the PCR machine produces billions or even trillions and there's no way to accurately count them. This is where the false positive creeps in.

I realize that's kind of complicated, but I hope it helps.

*Bonus Stacking* More! (This one is more complicated.)

PCR stands for Polymerase Chain Reaction which is a natural process that's based on splitting a DNA strand into two RNA strands. Each is used to produce a complete DNA strand.

The chain reaction is when the RNA (half of a DNA) becomes a complete DNA strand. To do that, free nucleotides from the sample are used. That's the doubling effect. It's a DNA copying machine not a DNA searching device. Each cycle does this again, taking each DNA strand and dividing them into two RNA strands that go on to produce two more DNA strands. Each cycle the number of target DNA strands doubles. The DNA being multiplied, is used in the process, and free nucleotides from the sample are used to make billions of the intended DNA strand.

Remember, this machine is designed to make billions of copies in hours. It's not intended for determining if a DNA sequence exists in the sample. In the intended use of the PCR machine a DNA sequence can be multiplied into billions of copies for; evolutionary biology to study minute amounts of DNA extracted from the fossil remains of ancient species; forensic analysis of traces of blood, semen, or strands of hair left at a crime scene; gene sequencing; and in genetic engineering to replicate the gene sequence to be installed by inserting the resulting copies into viruses that are finally injected into the target organism.

Therefore, when improperly using the PCR machine, it will use the sample as a source of nucleotides that are then made into the DNA supposedly being looked for. Like I said above, It's a DNA copying machine not a DNA searching device.

Despite all of that, if the sample has lots of exactly what's being copied, then more of it will be produced. Therefore, if a lot is found at the end of the process, that indicates that the sequence already existed in the sample. Still, that's an inappropriate use of the machine that breaks down as more and more cycles produce billions or trillions of copies.”

Suunds mre than plausible!

Onwards!!!

Please take a paid subscription or forward this article to those you think might be interested. You can also donate via Ko-fi – any amount from three dollars upwards. Ko-fi donations here:  https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.13.593878v1