Pfizer/BioNTech up diligence and compare useless original "vaccine" with new Omicron "vaccine" - 40 humans in each group rather than 8 mice

Keep in mind this is comparing one Pfizer/BioNTech product with another as a “placebo”. There is no true placebo or comparison with Vitamin D treatment protocols or IVM or HCQ protocols or any other C19 treatment protocol amongst the unvaxxed or vaxxed with one, two or three doses.

Here is a link to the bioRziv posting:

Improved Neutralization of Omicron BA.4/5, BA.4.6, BA.2.75.2, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1 with Bivalent BA.4/5 Vaccine | bioRxiv

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.11.17.516898v1

Note that the paper is a pre-print and NOT peer reviewed, though it has an impressive looking list of authors!

Jing Zou, Chaitanya Kurhade, Sohil Patel, Nicholas Kitchin, Kristin Tompkins, Mark Cutler, David Cooper, Qi Yang, Hui Cai, Alexander Muik, Ying Zhang, Dung-Yang Lee, Ugur Sahin, Annaliesa S. Anderson, William C. Gruber, View ORCID ProfileXuping Xie, Kena A. Swanson, Pei-Yong Shi - mostly Pfizer employees from the “Competing Interest Statement”.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.17.516898

Pfizer’s press release is here posted yesterday (18 November 2022):

Pfizer and BioNTech Report New Data on Omicron BA.4/BA.5-Adapted Bivalent Booster Demonstrating Improved Immune Response Against Emerging Omicron Sublineages | Pfizer

https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-report-new-data-omicron-ba4ba5-adapted

• One month after a 30-µg booster dose of the Omicron BA.4/BA.5-adapted bivalent COVID-19 vaccine, neutralizing antibody titers against emerging Omicron sublineages increased 3.2- to 4.8-fold compared to the companies’ original COVID-19 vaccine

• Neutralizing antibody titers against Omicron sublineages BA.4.6, BA.2.75.2, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1 increased 4.8- to 11.1-fold from pre-booster levels, following a 30-µg booster dose of the bivalent vaccine

• Omicron BA.5 continues to be the most prevalent sublineage in the United States (nearly 30% of cases), at the time of publication of the data, while the emerging BQ.1.1 sublineage accounts for nearly 25% of cases and is increasing globally

The press release has been referenced by Reuters and posted on MSN here

Pfizer/BioNTech's updated COVID shot shows strong response against BQ.1.1 (msn.com)

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/other/pfizer-biontech-s-updated-covid-shot-shows-strong-response-against-bq-1-1/ar-AA14hb7V

“(Reuters) -Pfizer Inc and its German partner BioNTech SE said on Friday their Omicron-tailored shot produced higher virus-neutralizing antibodies in older adults against the emerging subvariant BQ.1.1 than its original vaccine.”

Quite the sales pitch, right? A BA4.BA5 targeted “vaccine” works better against the emerging and likely soon to be dominant BQ1.1 (not BQ1?) mutation CAUSED by past useless and harmful injections targeting the defunct original strain of the virus.

A little background on the progress and current circulating variants, here:

What COVID-19 variants are going around in November 2022? | Nebraska Medicine Omaha, NE

https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/what-covid-19-variants-are-going-around

Historically,

And the current prevalence.

No currently circulating Delta or other variant (amazing how they can calibrate the RAT and RT-PCR tests these days right?). These 6 Omicron variants total almost 97% of circulating variants.

Circulating variants do not automatically mean that these have been identified as active “cases”. How many “cases” are there left in the USA? 1,345,000 according to Worldometers. Down from a peak of around 17.6 million in January 2022. For the USA’s 334.8 million population that is an active “case” rate of a little over 4,000 per million (0.4%) v the cumulative historic “case” rate of almost 300,000 per million (30%).

What pandemic and what emergency? What exactly are the stopping conditions for pandemics and emergencies?

Out of interest, India has less than 9,000 active “cases” left for its population of more than 1.4 billion for an active “case” rate of just 6 per million (more than 99% less than the US. India has a cumulative historic “case” rate of a little over 3% - 90% less than the US.

Back to the Reuters reporting by MSNBC.

“Antibody levels against the subvariant rose nearly nine-fold in older adults, aged 55 and above, who received the Omicron shot compared to a roughly two-fold increase in participants with the original shot, according to data posted on online archive bioRxiv”

Impressive! Right?

Let’s dive a little deeper.

“There were around 40 participants in each of the vaccine groups.”

Oh, 40 in two injected groups that either FAILED clinical trials (original injection) or which were tested on 8 mice (new bivalent injections)?

So, what might a “nine-fold” increase in antibody levels in the Omicron c19 mRNA injected group, compared to a “two fold” increase in antibody levels in the group injected with the original c19 mRNA actually mean?

Would these same “nine fold” and “two fold” increases in antibody levels been achieved with better nutrition, exercise or beer?. The currently active “case” rate for the US is 4,000 per million. Does the same logic prevail as before? Inject 99.6% of the population to prevent infection of 0.4% diagnosed as “cases” using RAT and RT-PCR tests?

The question for the WHO and world “governments” draws ever sharper into focus. “Should we inject the planet with toxins from criminal enterprises or provide clean water, food, sanitation and education?”

You would think the answer from the perspective of 8 billion people living on the planet would be obvious.

Prevent 9 million deaths globally, just from starvation and 2.5 million pneumonia deaths EVERY YEAR - for a total from just these two easily preventable deaths of around 35 million in the last three years for a few billion bucks

or

spend trillions upon trillions globally to PRETEND to deal with 6.4 million deaths after 3 years with C19 present.

Why aren’t other leading causes of death treated as pandemics? You know, like the global use of all sorts of “vaccines” or every other UNTRIALLED medical treatment or a recognition of the medical sins of the past, where there are NO STUDIES ON SIDE EFFECTS/ADVERSE EVENTS over time?

I am thinking that an alien observer looking at the earth would ne amazed at the callous stupidity of western politicians that choose to inflict pain and suffering rather than hope and progress.

Onwards!!