Rep Dan Crenshaw rips a Yale “woke” gender mutilating child abuser a new one
From this 17-minute video here:
Here is the transcript so you can refer back to the important parts of the testimony of the “Doctor” and questioning by Rep Crenshaw.
5:50 / 16:52
Woke Yale Doctor Gets EXPOSED During Tense Exchange About
Transcript
0:00
tell me a journal that has done
0:01
systematic reviews that cites different
0:02
evidence that cites strong evidence for
0:04
benefits of these therapies the
0:06
standards of care were developed based
0:07
on extensive you're not telling me any
0:10
Journal you're not telling me any study
0:11
don't say standards of care yeah so um
0:14
tell me
0:16
one the standards of care that's the the
0:19
standards of care that's that's that's
0:21
not a journal that's not a study that's
0:23
not an organization it's not an
0:24
institution you're just saying words so
0:27
let's shift Focus to the giant elephant
0:28
in the room and this is the
0:30
reauthorization for the children's
0:31
hospitals gme funding and yes it's true
0:33
this is my bill and what it does is it
0:37
with it withh holds funding from these
0:39
hospitals if they engage in what they
0:41
call gender affirmation therapy um these
0:43
physical changes to a child's physiology
0:47
permanently disfiguring them through
0:49
either puberty blockers or even surgical
0:51
modifications now look I understand that
0:53
the other side of the argument here
0:55
believes they are on the side of
0:57
compassion and maybe that's a sincerely
0:58
held belief it is just as true that I
1:01
believe we are on the side of compassion
1:04
I think it is indeed compassionate to
1:05
stop kids from being permanently
1:07
physically altered based on little to no
1:10
evidence that it will improve their
1:11
underlying mental condition now why is
1:14
this controversial that's actually
1:16
Beyond me not too long ago I think we
1:18
all agreed that performing double momies
1:19
on a 12-year-old girl was wrong now it's
1:22
become a political movement where
1:23
radical activists have bullied
1:25
mainstream medical associations and
1:27
members of Congress into repeating this
1:28
propaganda now it should be noted that
1:31
in the public this subject is actually
1:34
not very controversial in fact a recent
1:36
poll just last month by The Washington
1:38
Post showed that 68% of Americans
1:41
opposed using puberty blockers on
1:42
children that's just a question about
1:44
puberty blockers imagine if the question
1:47
had been about castration or surgical
1:49
interventions so you've got to convince
1:51
me that 70% of Americans or just a bunch
1:53
of fools that refuse to accept the
1:55
so-called science or maybe look I have
1:57
another theory Maybe they have a very
2:00
Baseline understanding of ethics and
2:02
Common Sense which tells us that maybe
2:04
just maybe it's a bad idea to submit
2:07
children to permanent life-altering
2:09
medical interventions based solely on a
2:11
temporary ideation about their gender
2:14
gender affirmation is not science and
2:16
there's no evidence-based standard of
2:17
care to say that is a lie or is at best
2:21
redefining the term
2:24
evidence-based what this is is a social
2:26
contagion it is based in pseudoscience
2:28
and radical ideologies and it's sweeping
2:30
across our country and encouraging
2:31
children to make irreversible changes to
2:33
their gender what's worse it's coming
2:35
from adults and institutions who know
2:37
better to include our children's
2:40
hospitals institutions that are supposed
2:42
to be Tethered to sound science and
2:45
their hypocritic oath of Do no harm now
2:48
maybe I'm an optimist but I do believe
2:49
that science and evidence will win out
2:51
in the end and in the future we will
2:52
look back at these gender affirming
2:54
therapies as we now look at labotomy and
2:56
electroshock
2:57
therapies I have some reason to be hop
2:59
ful notably Great Britain's National
3:01
Health Service restricted these clinical
3:03
interventions for minors just last week
3:05
reviews published in the British Journal
3:06
of Medicine the Journal of the endocrine
3:08
Society even in the American Academy of
3:10
Pediatrics all cite the lack of evidence
3:13
I'm going to submit for the record this
3:15
review published in the Journal of
3:16
endocrine society that found that there
3:17
is quote lowquality evidence for the
3:19
idea that hormonal treatment improves
3:21
quality of life depression and anxiety
3:23
among adolesence now here's important
3:26
part this was a systematic review which
3:28
by definition is is not cherry-picked
3:30
data but it's an all-encompassing review
3:33
of all the data it is Thoroughly
3:35
debunked the notion that any of these
3:37
treatments are quote evidence-based let
3:39
alone recognized as quote standard care
3:42
my colleagues are using these terms not
3:43
as accurate representations of the data
3:45
but as
3:46
propaganda now this funding program is
3:48
reauthorized every five years it
3:49
provides taxpayer funds to train
3:51
resident physicians at Children's
3:52
Hospitals across the country it's true
3:54
it's been a bipartisan funding mechanism
3:56
for years let's keep in mind something
3:59
though this is taxpayer money and when
4:02
70% of taxpayers oppose these barbaric
4:04
treatments on minors then taxpayer money
4:07
should not fund it that's why I'm
4:09
stipulating that as part of this
4:11
reauthorization we will not provide any
4:12
funding through this program to
4:14
children's hospitals that push gender
4:16
transition on minors through puberty
4:17
blockers hormone therapies and surgeries
4:20
let's be clear because there's another
4:21
lie that's been told it does not prevent
4:23
any mental health therapies at all
4:26
despite these lies being told it does
4:28
not prevent those kind of therapies at
4:29
all
4:30
this is the issue of our time this is a
4:31
hill we're going to die on um it's too
4:34
important it's too important to protect
4:36
our our our kids from this in my very
4:39
limited
4:40
time um I have too limited too much
4:43
limited time so I I'll wait for my
4:45
colleagues to yield to me to to ask
4:46
questions and I yield back thank you you
4:48
I want to say a few things first we keep
4:49
hearing this was this is a politicized
4:52
uh issue this is a manufactured culture
4:54
War I got to say we aren't the ones who
4:55
did that we aren't the ones that came up
4:57
with this radical new movement that is
4:59
per forming permanent physiological
5:01
changes to children with no evidence of
5:03
any benefits we we didn't start that
5:05
we're just trying to stop it because
5:07
it's
5:08
crazy it's a contentious issue which
5:11
almost 70% of Americans oppose so we are
5:14
just saying here that taxpayer money
5:17
shouldn't be used for it that's all this
5:19
should not be that controversial of an
5:21
issue um questions are for Dr mamera I I
5:24
just want to ask you honestly you're not
5:27
concerned about the unknown effects of
5:29
puberty blockers hormones and and
5:31
surgical interventions in kids the
5:33
long-term effects not concerned about
5:38
that everything I've said here today
5:40
comes from a place of deep honesty and
5:42
conviction for the care that I provide
5:44
and the community that I'm a part of
5:46
you've said that we've cherry-picked
5:47
data how do you mean by what how do you
5:50
mean that so it is very unscientific and
5:54
flawed to pick a single study or a
5:57
single statistic and to discuss it in
5:59
isolation
6:00
um totally medical experts are able to
6:02
talk about all of the evidence as a
6:03
whole totally agree so it's good to look
6:06
at systematic reviews right that's the
6:07
gold standard of evidence when you're
6:08
trying to understand whether something
6:11
works or whether it doesn't so the
6:12
British Journal of Medicine looked at 61
6:14
systematic reviews with the conclusion
6:16
that quote there is great uncertainty
6:17
about the effects of puberty blockers
6:19
cross- sex hormones and surgeries in
6:21
young people Journal of endocrine
6:23
Society came up with the same conclusion
6:25
even the American Academy of Pediatrics
6:26
all cite the lack of evidence so here's
6:28
the thing if you're doing a therapy and
6:30
it's you know temporary whatever fine
6:33
maybe let's try it let's see if it works
6:36
but when you're talking about permanent
6:37
physiological changes do you not agree
6:40
just from an ethical standpoint that you
6:42
might want extremely strong evidence of
6:45
the benefits and there is no systematic
6:47
review that that states that there is
6:50
strong evidence of benefits sir are you
6:52
aware of how the quality evidence
6:54
grading system works and how it's
6:56
applied yeah yeah we've read through it
6:59
that's why I'm citing these journals so
7:01
which Journal says something different
7:02
I'm we should have that debate tell me a
7:04
journal that has done systematic reviews
7:06
that cites different evidence that cite
7:07
strong evidence for benefits of these
7:09
therapies the standards of care were
7:11
developed based on extensive you're not
7:13
telling me any Journal you're not
7:15
telling me any study don't say standards
7:16
of care yeah so um tell me
7:20
one the standards of care that's the
7:23
standards of care that's that's that's
7:25
not a journal that's not a study that's
7:27
not an organization that's not an
7:28
institution you're just saying
7:31
words name one
7:34
study yeah I'm out of time uh Miss
7:36
Murphy you work for the FBI is that
7:39
correct yes sir Miss Murphy do you know
7:42
what Elite capture is Elite capture yeah
7:45
do you know what Elite capture is no sir
7:49
so basically Elite capture is used by
7:51
the CCP as a form of political Warfare
7:54
that seeks to control the actions of
7:56
political academic business and cultural
7:59
leaders outside of China to benefit the
8:01
CCP the means of control take a variety
8:04
of forms including Financial incentives
8:07
Financial dependence or compromise B
8:10
business entanglements offers of access
8:13
to Opportunities within China
8:15
ideological appeal and even blackmail
8:18
are you familiar with um these
8:20
techniques ma'am I am familiar with
8:22
those techniques do you have experience
8:24
with those techniques seeing those
8:26
techniques in your job experience in
8:29
seeing the Chinese government use those
8:31
techniques yeah or any other nation
8:33
state that wants to compromise us
8:35
officials I don't know that I've seen
8:37
them personally
8:40
um but I'm familiar with those
8:42
techniques yes sir okay Miss Murphy are
8:44
you aware that a chiny spy balloon uh
8:47
just recently Flew Over the US for about
8:48
a week I
8:50
am Miss Murphy are you aware that the
8:52
CCP is buying up us Farmland near
8:55
military
8:56
bases I've heard reports of that I don't
8:59
know what evidence I've seen of
9:01
it
9:02
okay Miss Murphy does it concern you
9:06
some of the revelations that have been
9:07
coming out of the oversight committee
9:10
about the millions of dollars that have
9:12
been paid to the Biden family recently
9:14
I'm not aware of money being paid to the
9:16
Biden family oh you're not aware of that
9:18
at all no sir that's interesting you're
9:21
the you work for the FBI right yes sir I
9:24
do but I would respectfully refer you to
9:26
the the investigators over that case I'm
9:29
sure we can get you a brief on that that
9:31
that is not a case that that I handle
9:33
yeah well I don't need a brief on that
9:35
ma'am to know that there are nation
9:38
states that have paid millions of
9:39
dollars to the Biden family and that's
9:42
one of the reasons that we're having
9:43
this hearing that's one of the reasons
9:45
that Americans are so concerned that
9:47
they see Chinese spy balloons flying
9:48
over the US for an entire week that's
9:51
why they're so concerned that they see
9:53
these Chinese police stations being set
9:55
up here and they're wondering how could
9:57
this go on this doesn't make any sense
10:00
and yet the son of the president of the
10:02
United States is involved and
10:05
entangled for many years now in multiple
10:08
business deals that the president claims
10:10
he knows nothing about and you ma'am you
10:13
sit here before the homeland security
10:16
committee our job is to protect the
10:18
Homeland and you act as if you don't
10:20
know anything about
10:24
it you understand why the American
10:27
people are concerned ma'am
10:32
yes or no I understand why American
10:34
people should be concerned about the
10:35
threat from the Chinese Communist party
10:39
yeah do you see any connections with
10:42
what I talked about when I was talking
10:44
about Elite capture do you see are you
10:46
connecting the dots at all no sir you
10:49
don't connect the
10:51
dots so your job is to protect the
10:53
American people I just read you what
10:56
Elite capture is the summary the
10:58
definition of Elite
11:01
capture everybody knows in this town
11:03
what's going on everybody knows what's
11:05
coming out of these committee hearings
11:06
right
11:08
now and it's pretty sad coming from
11:12
somebody who as a young man wanted to be
11:14
a part of your
11:16
organization because of the reputation
11:18
that men and women from the FBI had
11:21
built up over
11:24
decades and now the American
11:27
people hardly Trust the
11:30
FBI they
11:32
struggle with the Department of Justice
11:35
quite
11:36
frankly generally they feel as
11:40
if if you don't have the right
11:44
politics you can basically do whatever
11:47
you want the American people quite
11:48
honestly are wondering why Hunter Biden
11:50
is still walking the
11:53
streets um I want to want to make a
11:56
comment about something that one of my
11:57
colleagues who just left the room room
11:59
said you know he made a reference to the
12:02
former president of the United States
12:04
and his family and their known business
12:08
dealings in China and other places you
12:11
know I found it interesting because one
12:12
of the biggest differences between the
12:15
Trump family and their foreign business
12:17
dealings and the Biden family and their
12:20
foreign foreign business dealings is
12:22
that the Trump Family actually owns
12:25
businesses they actually own hotels and
12:28
resorts
12:29
okay pretty Stark difference from what
12:32
we're learning what many of us knew and
12:34
now we're actually learning as the
12:37
oversight and Judiciary Committee
12:39
actually get to uh bring in Witnesses
12:43
you know the sad thing is for everybody
12:45
in this room everybody in this room
12:47
everybody in this town everybody in this
12:49
country knows that if the FBI and our
12:52
doj had the type of damning information
12:55
hard evidence bank records Etc on the
12:59
money laundering that this President his
13:01
family have been up to the last couple
13:04
years and their names were Eric and Don
13:08
Jr we wouldn't even be having this
13:10
hearing you know why they'd be in jail
13:14
and this is exactly the type of thing I
13:16
was talking about Miss Murphy and this
13:19
is exactly why so many of your
13:21
colleagues have had
13:24
enough and they've become
13:26
whistleblowers Miss Murphy what do you
13:28
think about about that so many of your
13:30
colleagues have had enough what do you
13:33
think about the whistleblowers that just
13:35
said I can't do it anymore I can't cover
13:37
for the organization the
13:39
institution that I work for because I
13:41
didn't swear an oath to them I actually
13:43
swore an oath to the United States and
13:45
the Constitution what do you think about
13:47
that ma'am does it do you feel like they
13:50
betrayed the institution or are you glad
13:52
that they're up
13:57
here sir I appreciate the question um
14:01
you know I I'm I'm proud and I'm happy
14:04
that we live in a country where there's
14:06
whistle plow or protection acts and that
14:09
people can come forward when they think
14:10
things have done been done incorrectly
14:13
you know like I support the FBI I think
14:15
the FBI does amazing work you know ma'am
14:17
I think they do do some amazing work too
14:21
but I think we both
14:23
know that it's its reputation is
14:27
massively tarnished
14:29
and I think we're both glad that we have
14:31
whistleblower Provisions in this country
14:33
but I think if we weren't you weren't
14:35
under oath and we weren't wearing these
14:37
clothes and in this room right now and
14:39
we were having a private
14:41
conversation I sure hope there's part of
14:43
you that is
14:45
embarrassed and disgusted with what the
14:47
FBI has been up to and I know the
14:50
American people are I mean look at look
14:53
at the movies growing
14:55
up you guys are in like every movie as
14:58
the
14:59
hero when when you were a little girl
15:02
and you were watching movies growing up
15:04
did you notice that that those those
15:07
cool Blue Jackets with the bright yellow
15:10
lettering the FBI on it did was that
15:12
pretty was that pretty cool watching
15:14
those movies growing up and those TV
15:16
shows and now getting to work for this
15:18
organization it's amazing to work for
15:20
this organization yes sir yeah is there
15:22
a part of you though is there a part of
15:24
you though that feels torn ma'am like
15:26
like the whistleblowers that are coming
15:28
up here now and Roes that just say I
15:30
can't I can't do it anymore I didn't
15:32
swear an oath to the
15:35
FBI is there a part of you that feels
15:37
torn or not at
15:42
all ma'am I'm asking you a serious
15:45
question sir I'm very proud to work for
15:48
the FBI I think I stated that I I know
15:50
you are that's not what I asked you
15:51
ma'am I asked you if you feel
15:53
torn not at the least not the
15:57
slightest that's that's pretty sad ma'am
16:00
that really is and it really shows who
16:02
your allegiances are
16:05
to it really does and as somebody who
16:08
served this country
16:11
myself and comes I come from a very
16:13
proud unit the SEAL
16:15
Teams I know that my allegiances are not
16:18
to nsw Naval special Warfare they're not
16:21
to a Seal
16:22
Team and I am glad I am so proud that we
16:26
have men and women who see
16:29
their oath to this country and they said
16:33
I can't do it anymore I'm going to go
16:35
try and straighten this out so that the
16:36
organization that I love can maybe just
16:40
maybe be turned around quit being a
16:43
partisan tool and actually protect the
16:46
American people which it clearly is not
16:49
doing right now thank you
End of transcript.
Onwards!!!
Please take a (free or paid) subscription or forward this article to those you think might be interested. You can also donate via Ko-fi – any amount from three dollars upwards. Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan
🙃🙃🙃🤗🤗🤗😘😘😘😍😍😍🥰🥰🥰
What is the name of the brainwashed doctor ?