Send a 90 second video to the WHO in the next 4 days with pandemic comments

It might just save your life and those of your loved ones

The WHO has asked for public replies, in video form, to the following question:

“Based on your experience with the COVID-19 pandemic, what do you believe should be addressed at the international level to better protect against future pandemics?”

Coaching on how to submit plus some views on what is going on are on the three links below.

First one from Steve Kirsch (note his video may be rejected because it is 100 seconds, not 90!!!):

Here is the video comment I submitted to the WHO today (substack.com)

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/here-is-the-video-commented-i-submitted

The second is from Tess Lawrie

The WHO is asking for our input. Let’s give it. (substack.com)

https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/the-who-is-asking-for-our-input-lets

amd a third from Dr Mark Trozzi

https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/the-who-is-asking-for-our-input-lets

Most of the planet is not familiar with how to create a 90 second video - a transcript is also needed.

This is typical of a barrier that is erected to enforce “soft censorship” of views by organizations paying lip service to public input. Firstly, there is no publicity around the invitation to submit. Secondly a tight deadline is imposed (a few weeks in this case) thirdly, the format is intimidating and difficult for all but the most technoligically adept and self-confident.

The “clients” of the WHO are the 7.8 billion people on the planet. 90% of them will not even see the request for submissions. Another 9.9% will not have the self-confidence, time or the inclination to submit a 90 second video.

As a reminder of the back-drop to the two and half years of the pandemic, there are three significant periods. The first is the pandemic itself (which can be viewed as the 2020 calendar year) the second is the first year when CoVID-19 injections were being rolled out with progressive uptake with some booster uptake (which can be viewed as the 2021 calendar year) and the third is the period where all those likely to be injected twice had been injected plus many with boosters (which can be viewed as the 2022 calendar year to date).

So, 2020 - no injections just the disease, 2021 first year of injections and 2022, the fully injected year with some boosting.

In 2020, globally, there were 70 million cases and 1.7 million deaths with CoVID-19 present.

From here: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccinations - Our World in Data more than two -thirds of the world have received at least one dose of more than 12.6 billion doses administered globally.

https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations

Now, after the second and third periods of increasing and then fully injected populations there have been 614 million cases and 6.5 million deaths.

Here are global cases and deaths over the full term of the pandemic spanning all three distinct periods.

Coronavirus Graphs: Worldwide Cases and Deaths - Worldometer (worldometers.info)

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/worldwide-graphs/#total-cases

Data is corrupted in many ways. Firstly, by use of an RT-PCR test that was never meant to be used to determine infection, only the presence of viral particles. The RT-PCR test produces increasingly false positives beyond 24 amplification cycles, whereas every country usually used between 35 and 40 cycles, producing a majority of false positive “cases” and “deaths”. Secondly, the vast majoirty (95%) of deaths from the SARS-COV2 virus that was present at time of CoVID-19 diagnosed death were amongst those with between 2 and 6 other co-morbidities and who had exceeded life expectancy by 1-2 years. Lastly, “old flu” vanished, to be reclassified as “novel coronavirus”.

This is the backdrop for the “effective” component of one aspect of the CoVID-19 response. The other responses of lockdowns - proven to be ineffective and harmful - masking - proven to be ineffective and harmful - denial of non-CoVID-19 treatments - harmful at best and deadly at worst - economic, psychological and destructive of societal cohesion - harmful and distressing.

These should all be part of a 90 second video - already impossible - especially given the disdain and lack of response already witnessed by the WHO to direct evidence of each of these factors.

Now turn to the harms of the injections. It is already plain to see by all but the most evil and malicious that the injections do not prevent infection, transmission, disease or death. (more than 8 times the cases and almost 4 times the deaths since the start of the injection roll-out in December 2020.

Now comes the advere event reporting. Many countries have reporting systems for the adverse events from injections. It is time consuming and onerous to complete submissions and although open to public submission, the majority of reports are submitted by hard-pressed and busy medical staff that are required to spend an extra hour or two a day submitting reports.

The adverse event reporting systems have been shown to capture less than one in 100 “adverse events” from injections in the past (Lazarus Report) and have recently been estimated to receive an more than doubling of this one in 100, to just one in 40.

So, more than 97% of events are NOT reported. Now consider that the “adverse events” themselves, including deaths that are reported to these systems are not considered to be due to injections until 14 days have passed. Now consider than the majority of SHORT TERM adverse reactions, including death, occur within 14 days. See bottom chart here - COVID Vaccine Data - OpenVAERS .

Next consider that adverse events worsen over time, but by the time the adverse event occurs, doctors are unlikely to associate the adverse event, including death, with injections that occurred months prior. Recent estimates are that the peak in adverse reactions occurs five months after injections (see Steve Kirsch substack for details).

Even so, the US VAERS system and EU EUDRA system are reporting tens of thousands of deaths and millions upon millions of injuries. The approximate 600 million US doses and around 900 million EU doses are around one eighth of global doses.

In other words, it is rational to complete a “back of the envelope” estimate of global deaths and injuries from injections by multiplying the sum of VAERS and EUDRA data first by 40 to adjust for under-reporting and then by 8 to “globalize”.

Multiply by 320.

When EU + US adverse event numbers are multiplied by 320, you come up with 20 million dead and close to 2 billion injuries (multiple per person).

Again, this sort of information is required to be condensed into a 90 second video - a video that will be dismissed with prejudice by the WHO - because the WHO already knows all this and deems if insignificant for its purposes.

All this before the fact that the CLINICAL TRIALS of the injections forced the emergence of the deadly Delta variant and the mild Omicron variants, see here: Rise of the VARIANTS - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5a7PLv9JkF4&t=3s

skip to 2 minute mark.

Lastly, factor in the other information on preventative measures that needs to be included.

Preventative measures that have demonstrated success in dramatically (80-90%) reducing the infectiousness and seriousness of the virus and disease (including eradicating the presence of the SARS-COV2 virus and CoVID19 diseases in a region of 240 million people (Uttar Pradesh state of India).

The WHO was on the ground in Uttar Pradesh distributing treatment kits with Ivermectin present. It knows that Ivermectin eradicates the virus and disease. It also knows that nutrition and hygiene are essential in the prevention of transmission and infectin of diseases. However, the WHO is sponsored by companies that profit from the injection of useless vaccines that make tens if not hundreds of billions of dollars in annual profits from useless and harmful injections (of toxins).

Put all this in a 90 second video that will be immediately ignored BECAUSE THE WHO KNOWS ALL THIS??? This is akin to asking a mass murderer to be his own judge and jury, when the punishment for guilt would be a death sentence. It is not going to happen.

But, if you believe that the WHO has honest intentions and will listen, understand and act on your 90 second video, please go ahead. I applaud your good intentions.