I thought I’d push this out between drinks, while the “creative juices” were flowing (and before they ran out entirely!).
After the discussion about yellow top vials in Denmark, whilst not focussing particularly on the lethality of the other colours, I was tempted to draw up a questionnaire on Substack around the topic of placebos.
But then I was inspired by the news that the Plandemic “Great Awakening” documentary series has been seen OVER A BILLION TIMES
So iI thought about other things. Such as, there is no such thing as a “true” placebo any more since all Americans have been injected with so many toxins present in vaccines, since birth, that all that the only “true” placebos are communities like the Mormons or other religious sects that ban injections of any sort.
There is little need for any placebo testing as those (Mormon and Jehovah’s Witnesses?) groups can be used instead and adjustments made for age and gender. That would maybe preclude race, exercise and alternate diet considerations because of the homogeneity? Can you imagine the outcry from vaccine makers, whose business goal is to create health conditions that require expensive drugs – paid for with insurance premia - whilst being paid by taxpayers for a relatively cheap “gateway” poison adjuvant.
A side by side comparison of the rates of autism, ADHD, Alzheimer’s, cancers, diabetes, heart disease etc, would simply send big pharma to water supplies of segregated religious communities to poison water and the earth via aerosol spraying or some such. Otherwise, the entire vaccine industry would be shown to be the cause of long term health issues – can’t have that! Right?!?
So, instead, I thought I would frame the informed consent that the perpetrators of abominations at the FDA and CDC SHOULD have provided.
Here we go, clinical trial data here:
The COVID-19 Inoculations - More Harm Than Good FINAL Video & Print (canadiancovidcarealliance.org)
1. The C19 mRNA injections have never been successfully trialled on animals or humans, nor have they been manufactured to good manufacturing standards. As such, they are a completely new and experimental technology that we have granted emergency use authorization.
2. We did not recommend any other treatment protocols for off-label or emergency use (such as IVM and HCQ treatment protocols) as they would prevent our emergency use authorization of the C19 mRNA injections you are about to take. Many of these treatment protocols have demonstrated safety and effectiveness for prophylaxis, early to mid stage cures and some efficacy in late stages of C19 disease. Emergency use authorization was based on results of Phase 3 clinical trials that were terminated four months into the six month stipulated trial period – that is, 2 months before trials were completed.
3. The two dose regimen of C19 mRNA injections you are about to take has not been tested to see if it prevents infection or transmission.
4. The clinical trials indicated that for every 100 people that receive the two dose initial course, ONE infection will be prevented. (Absolute Risk Reduction of 1%, though I have seen some reports of around 0.5%),
5. Other results - beyond the clinical trial indicate that it would take between 600 (Pfizer) and 900 (Moderna) C19 mRNA injections to prevent a single hospitalization from the C19 disease itself. (Need to check if that was doses or people - if 2 doses per person that would be 300 to 450 people, I think it was doses).
6. Whilst no adverse events from other treatment protocols (such as IVM and HCQ) were seen, Phase 3 clinical trials for Pfizer indicated that around 25% of people experience an adverse event from the C19 mRNA injection, which is 3 times more than the placebo group.
7. 1.2% of those injected suffered a life altering (severe) even - compared to 0.7& in the placebo group.
8. 0.6% of those injected suffered a life threatening event v 0.5% in the placebo.
9. 20 out of 21,926 people died in the injected group v 14 in the placebo.
10. The above comparisons are for a two dose initial course. The injections wane after 4-6 months after which time, you will require additional injections.
11. The injections will force the emergence of variants for which the injections will be ineffective.
12. The manufacturers of the C19 mRNA injections have no liability for harms caused. There are two vaccine injury compensation schemes that do not pay out much if anything.
13. The manufacturers have no responsibility for varying quality of injections and can vary the contents to be markedly different from the clinical trials as they please (typical Pfizer contract here: 25 Page Pfizer contract to EU member state, Slovenia (substack.com) ““..the Vaccine and materials related to the Vaccine and materials related to the Vaccine, and their components and constituent materials are being rapidly developed..”
14. Each dose shuts down your immune system for 14 days, during which time you will be susceptible to any infection of any kind, including C19. It is likely that adverse events will effectively reduce your immune system capability by 25%.
I have not mentioned the post-marketing authorisation report, or the V-Safe data or any under-reporting factor of adverse events following the toll-out of 677 million doses in the US. Neither have I mentioned that the clinical trials were for the healthy (almost all) between 18 and 65 – with no tests for pregnant women, or children, tots or babies. Neither have I mentioned sudden deaths, turbo cancers, myocarditis or interaction of C19 mRNA injections with new or existing treatment protocols for non-C19 conditions, or those that develop (e.g. how does C19 mRNA injections interact with drugs for heart, lung, liver, kidney, brain or eye conditions?).
Neither have I mentioned the availability/affordability of treatments for the poor, or the possibility that Novavax may be more suitable (no adverse events?) for blacks v other colours.
Actually, there’s a bunch of stuff I haven’t mentioned like IgG1-4 antibody levels, injections tainted with pollutants from poor manufacturing, circular instead of linear DNA and eColi contamination and all the other studies indicating horrifying heart conditions in particular – but you get the picture.
I am sure you can add a bunch more.
By the time we iterate and then split between clinical trial indications, post marketing authorisation indications and all the studies/estimates over the two and a half years of the injections, we would completely fill one side of a package insert!
Happy fourth!
Onwards
Please upgrade to paid, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan Buying just one Ko-Fi a week for $3 is 50 bucks more than an annual $100 subscription!
I applaud 'having a go' at this. I also love your 'back of the napkin number crunching'. However, I hope you at least keep in mind the scale of scientific and data failure we have been dealing with for the past century.
I suggest that even with all the whistleblowers, vaccine adverse event reports and anecdotal evidence you have been keeping track of, you are still citing really flawed risk numbers.
As an example, you are citing comparisons in this article which came from studies where a cohort of tens of thousands being tracked for adverse events were reduced to zero by the 12 week mark. This is as close to zero attempt to record medium or long term effects as you can get.
Consider that this sort of fudging would lead to a 'zero observed risk of infertility' claim, when real life is a very dramatic risk of infertility.
Keeper.
Plus the more you get, the more likely you are to get covid..it was the third most frequent adverse event.