Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Shane Pisani's avatar

I applaud 'having a go' at this. I also love your 'back of the napkin number crunching'. However, I hope you at least keep in mind the scale of scientific and data failure we have been dealing with for the past century.

I suggest that even with all the whistleblowers, vaccine adverse event reports and anecdotal evidence you have been keeping track of, you are still citing really flawed risk numbers.

As an example, you are citing comparisons in this article which came from studies where a cohort of tens of thousands being tracked for adverse events were reduced to zero by the 12 week mark. This is as close to zero attempt to record medium or long term effects as you can get.

Consider that this sort of fudging would lead to a 'zero observed risk of infertility' claim, when real life is a very dramatic risk of infertility.

Expand full comment
Duchess's avatar

Keeper.

Plus the more you get, the more likely you are to get covid..it was the third most frequent adverse event.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts