Some possible shenanigans at leading cancer research institute Dana-Farber
I wonder if this rings any alarm bells in the Pro-Vaxx research community:
“The investigation includes scores of papers authored by four top scientists and institute leaders, including CEO Laurie Glimcher and COO William Hahn.”
From here:
Dana-Farber researchers moving to retract paper in investigation (statnews.com)
“Dana-Farber cancer researchers moving to retract one paper, correct others in broad investigation of manipulated data”
Well hmm. What’s all this about?
“Scientists at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, one of the nation’s leading cancer research and treatment centers, are “moving to” retract one paper and correct others amid an expanding investigation of data manipulation, officials told STAT. The investigation includes scores of papers authored by four top scientists and institute leaders, including CEO Laurie Glimcher and COO William Hahn.
Dana-Farber officials disclosed that the review process began for some studies more than a year ago. The institute’s research integrity officer, Barrett Rollins, told STAT this week that while Dana-Farber has not completed reviewing all of the claims, several are serious enough that researchers are talking with journals about retracting one paper and correcting others. None of the allegations reviewed thus far was dismissed for lack of scientific merit.
“They were all credible,” Rollins said. “So far.”
So, all the papers had “scientific merit”. I wonder whether any involved the treatment of people with experimental treatments or gene therapies or if they employed the same “scientific methods” endorsed by the FDA or CDC?
Probably nothing, right?
From its website:
Homepage | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
“Dana-Farber physicians and researchers have helped develop many of the very latest therapies — from harnessing the immune system to targeted therapies based on the genetics of your cancer. Which means we can provide the latest and best care, sooner.”
It is funded by “Jimmy Fund”.
Here’s a link to its Forbes page:
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute | Company Overview & News (forbes.com)
Here’s a snapshot for the Pfizer and Moderna corporate take-over lawyers and financiers.
Onwards!
Please subscribe or donate via Ko-fi – any amount from 3 bucks upwards. Don’t worry and God Bless, if you can’t or don’t want to. Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 Ko-fi donation a week!
Dana Farber recommended the jabs to all their cancer patients. Brigham and Women's mandated them.
They also would manipulate their studies by withdrawing patients who failed to show improvement.
IT would not show up in the paper, but in the data they used. I know this personally, my best friend is a patient there. She got kicked out a study when after the jab her cancer came back.
Hard to know what this is.
Could be a scrubbing, could be a character assassination of Laurie Glimcher (or others). Or it could be a publicly-visible, non-statement statement about the current poor standards of what passes for Research.
Time will tell.
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2024/1/12/dana-farber-research-misconduct-allegations/