Supposedly "New and Improved" C19 bivalent boosters are just the same as the "Old and toxic" boosters

From here:

New studies find Omicron COVID boosters no better than original, contradicting feds' messaging | Just The News

https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/new-studies-find-omicron-covid-boosters-no-better-original

“New preprint studies by researchers at Columbia University and Beth Israel Deaconness Medical Center, not yet peer-reviewed, found that the bivalents showed no meaningful improvement over the original monovalent boosters that targeted the Wuhan strain alone.”

This is my shocked face :>|

"[A]nyone billing these bivalent vaccines as 'better' or 'improved' is simply not telling the truth," Hawaii family physician Buzz Hollander wrote in his newsletter, which was picked up by RealClearScience.

"So let's not pretend; because if the Wuhan/BA.4-5 bivalent data ends up as mediocre as the early returns on the Wuhan/BA.1 booster, people are going to wonder why they were sold a 'better' product after so little study," he said.”

Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me three times, shame on my parents and teachers, fool me four times.. sentence me to house arrest and let me play a NPC in Dungeons and Dragons (NPC = non-playing character).

(8) Jay Bhattacharya on Twitter: "Two new pre-prints (Columbia U & Beth Israel Deaconess) show no additional neutralizing antibody levels from the BA4/5 booster relative to the original vax. Maybe the FDA should have asked for human data before approving? https://t.co/iknnBI47DK https://t.co/jsazfS7BdO" / Twitter

Onwards!