Teaser to an article on the “running for cover” of those first claiming “there is no DNA in the shots” to “the DNA is there but is too small and degrades quickly”. Missouri Health Board take note!

Teaser to an article on the “running for cover” of those first claiming “there is no DNA in the shots” to “the DNA is there but is too small and degrades quickly”. Missouri Health Board take note!

I cannot repost as the bulk of the article is for paid subscribers only.

Here is what is public.

From here:

How long are the DNA fragments in BNT162b2? - by Anandamide (substack.com)

How long are the DNA fragments in BNT162b2? What can Nanopore sequencing show us

ANANDAMIDE

2 AUG 2023

The critics of our work have quickly shifted their arguments from the “DNA does not exist in the vaccines” to an admission that DNA does exist but the length of the DNA that is found is nothing to worry about.

Much of this goal post shifting has occurred since Dr. Sin Lee and Dr. Buckhaults have confirmed the presence of the DNA. Dr. Buckhaults performed this confirmation with his own vials that have proven chain of custody. His CT scores are 18-19 while the vials we have in our possession are 15.5-17CT.

Now that the presence of the DNA has been confirmed, the arguments have shifted to question its exact quantity (which we expect to vary vial to vial based on the EMA disclosures) and to critique the length of those DNA fragments.

It is true that the Illumina sequencing we first performed on these vaccines has read length limitations that can’t address this question. Some guidelines only concern themselves with DNA that is over 200bp in size. However, the logic behind the fragments under 200bp not being relevant is flawed. They assume DNA under this size range cant code for an Open Reading Frame (ORF) or if it does it will create such a short peptide (66 amino acids) that it wont be relevant or the DNA being short will be broken down quickly.

A few reasons this argument is flawed.

1) The regulations didn’t anticipate this DNA being inside nuclease resistant LNPs, therefore short length doesn’t imply rapid degradation.

2) Even small DNA fragments can be functional. The 72bp SV40 Enhancer is one such element that is known to recruit transcription factors and mobilize the DNA to the nucleus. David Deans work covers this.

3) Even small fragments, if integrated can knock a human gene out of frame and cause problems.

But let us address the problem directly and survey the DNA with sequencers that have unlimited read length.

Oxford Nanopores (ONT) are great at this. While they have longer read lengths, they come with more sequencing error. Additionally some of the ONT techniques selectively clone and sequence shorter fragments so this fragment length assessment will be biased to count smaller molecules more readily than longer ones but it can still provide some information.

Onwards

Please upgrade to paid, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan  Buying just one Ko-Fi a week  for $3 is 50 bucks more than an annual $100 subscription!