Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dan...'s avatar

Quality is only important when backfire has to be considered. With outrageous removal of liability for the product, combined with “no questions asked” policy of forced product application, there is no space for quality. No matter how many ISOs refer to the company, facilities, substances, or the humorously named “good manufacturing practices”.

But… Part of the quality tale in this case refers to dose/contents consistency. We are led to believe that it is achievable or, even worse, that it is an industry standard. Is it?

“…After dilution, the vial contains 6 doses, of 0.3 mL with 30 micrograms … each…” 1 dose for 1 person. The plan was to administer equal doses 0.3 mL of liquid to 8 billion people (according to BG, “pretty much the whole world”). The question is how can you ensure that everyone gets the same - truly the same - dose? There is a series of guaranteed failures here. First, the precision of measurement (30 mkg) is impossible to achieve in any administration setting. This is a liquid, presumably suspension, which simply cannot be split into 100% equal portions. The nurse won’t have time, willingness, awareness of the problem, and instruments to do it. Right from the bat, 6 patients get 6 different doses. The substance contents in those doses varies beyond imagination and cannot be verified in any way. Blind faith. During dilution, further inconsistencies come into play. We are already with 3 layers of huge mathematical errors, and the patient has not even arrived on the scene. During the administration, some product will be lost (spilled) from the needle - nobody knows how much of it is gone. Some will remain in the needle after the injection. Two more layers of logarithmically compounding errors.

And it’s not only about micrograms. They say there are xx billion active particles of that thing in each dose. Really? How did they count it? How? There is no mechanism anywhere to make such calculations. And then, to smart copy them from vial to vial and from dose to dose. It’s all fake. The numbers on the vials and on paper sheets are fake.

And the most important issue. This broil is done in 200-liter pots. The substrates are biological, active, impossible to measure by definition. Nobody knows what actually is in each boiling pot. Now, imagine the transition from 200 liters to 0.3 microgram. The very difference of magnitude forces errors as large as the solar system. Speaking about “quality” or “safety” of medical products created in this way (process) is beyond science fiction.

Consequently, all postmarketing data are false. There is no baseline, there is no reference to any uniform unit of measure, and this mess is compounded by the default variability of all vital parameters of all recipients. It’s all fiction.

The best part is that quite a number of folks try to figure out something “scientific” or “statistical” from this mess. Some of them are even perceived as heroes. All based on incomplete, skewed, false or fake data arbitrarily uploaded and doctored as needed.

“You want the quality? You can’t handle the quality!”

Expand full comment

No posts