The appalling cost of the “woke” agenda – poor quality, waste, suffering and death
Check out this clip from the movie “Kingdom of Heaven”
VENUS & THE CRESCENT MOON - YouTube
Maybe there are parallels with current events. The movie culminates with the taking of Jerusalem by the Muslim armies of Salah ad-Din Yusuf ibn Ayyub (Saladin) in the late 12th century. Lots of messaging about good and evil, with the gamut in the ranks of the Crusaders.
Which brings me to the bigger picture.
The Romans aspired to “virtue and excellence”. Of course, Roman history is littered with examples of genocide, enslavement and barbarism – as did all “great” civilisations of the time and centuries prior - but Romans shaped much of the world as we see it.
But I digress. The issue I want to highlight is quality, or rather the lack of it and its erosion by the “woke”.
I am a firm proponent of the expression “get woke, go broke”, along the lines of the Bud Light experience. There are many other examples. The expression epitomises many things that occur, not just in the branding of products, but also in every aspect of every supply chain in every product and service. From EV’s to Boeing Dreamliner to the DMV, the justice system, food, water, ELECTIONS, the FDA, CDC, City Hall, Congress, college campuses all of it.
Here’s the widely used quality components:
Quality planning involves identifying goals, determining quality standards, and defining the procedures that will be used to check that these criteria are being met.
Quality control is the process of physically inspecting and testing products or services to ensure that they meet the standards put in place during the planning stage.
Quality assurance involves reviewing the delivery process of services or the manufacturing of goods to catch mistakes before they reach the customer.
Quality improvement is the process of continuously improving the quality of products or services by identifying areas for improvement and implementing changes to address them.
There are ISO standards for quality management.
ISO 9001:2015 Certification – 8 Components of a Top-Quality Management System - ISO Update
These factors can be enshrined in regulations where there is the potential for harms caused by poor quality. They cost money to adhere too – quality costs – in order to safeguard people – lack of quality costs in terms of real and potential harms, including death, to people.
The “woke” hate quality. It exposes their shortcomings and belief system that “anyone can do anything”.
In order to achieve quality, you need information and transparency. Freedom of speech is also vital. Which is why the “woke” hate free speech, since it exposes the fallacy of their arguments and restricts progress.
We have been subjected to heinous and egregious examples of the “woke” suppression of information and transparency at the FDA and CDC – public health bodies on which the quality of our lives and our lives themselves depend.
The latest examples include revelations about the numbers in clinical trials that were “lost to follow up” and in post marketing authorization reports of thousands of “Unknown” outcomes amongst the 42,000 or so adverse events (including 1,223 deaths) over the first few months of the C19 mRNA injections.
An article in the British Medical Journal has caused an uproar. It turns out that only the first report of an averse event is published on VAERS – there is a SECRET database of follow-ups to those initially reported adverse events.
h/t to WelcometheEagle88 who first published the article on 10 November 2023
Is the US’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System broken? | The BMJ
(100) The BMJ Investigates The Broken System Known As VAERS (substack.com)
Just the News is covering it today:
Feds keep hidden books on vaccine injury reports, barely follow up: investigation | Just The News
We know that the tens of thousands of FDA/CDC employees were not deployed during a national emergency to process VAERS events, instead tens of millions of dollars were paid to General Dynamics IT to process these adverse events. In addition, Pfizer had to employ hundreds of extra employees to process reports – not only onto VAERS as required by law (anyone check the post marketing authorization report here with the VAERS system on 28 February 2021?) and the doses administered in the EU and US by end February 2021 – Pfizer reported doses shipped of 126 million, but only 70 odd million were actually administered, severely distorting the harm ratios?)
So, on top of the failures in quality in the manufacturing process that have probably impacted around one fifth of the billions injected and one death per 800 doses, from either the C19 viral vector injections (all withdrawn in just a few months 2021 – with no quality follow up of clinical trial adverse event signalling) and/or the C19 mRNA injections, we also have the “failure to follow up” and “unknown” outcomes.
The Daily Clout team has exposed that there should have been a few hundred deaths during the Pfizer phase III clinical trials, compared to the 38 reported, amidst hundreds of participants “lost to follow-up” – probably because half of them died. Either because they could have been expected to die, statistically, or they were killed by the injections.
All of which reflect poor quality.
Are the regulators “woke”? Well, they exhibit all the hallmarks of adhering to this mantra:
Bill Murray "It Just Doesn't Matter!" - YouTube
The bottom line – “QUAITY MATTERS” so does always striving for it – IN PUBLIC FOR AGENCIES FUNDED BY TAXES.
We pay taxes to hire public servants to act on our behalf. They work for us, not anyone else.
Onwards!
Please subscribe or make a donation via Ko-fi – any amount from 3 bucks upwards. Don’t worry and God Bless, if you can’t or don’t want to. Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 Ko-fi donation a week!
Quality is only important when backfire has to be considered. With outrageous removal of liability for the product, combined with “no questions asked” policy of forced product application, there is no space for quality. No matter how many ISOs refer to the company, facilities, substances, or the humorously named “good manufacturing practices”.
But… Part of the quality tale in this case refers to dose/contents consistency. We are led to believe that it is achievable or, even worse, that it is an industry standard. Is it?
“…After dilution, the vial contains 6 doses, of 0.3 mL with 30 micrograms … each…” 1 dose for 1 person. The plan was to administer equal doses 0.3 mL of liquid to 8 billion people (according to BG, “pretty much the whole world”). The question is how can you ensure that everyone gets the same - truly the same - dose? There is a series of guaranteed failures here. First, the precision of measurement (30 mkg) is impossible to achieve in any administration setting. This is a liquid, presumably suspension, which simply cannot be split into 100% equal portions. The nurse won’t have time, willingness, awareness of the problem, and instruments to do it. Right from the bat, 6 patients get 6 different doses. The substance contents in those doses varies beyond imagination and cannot be verified in any way. Blind faith. During dilution, further inconsistencies come into play. We are already with 3 layers of huge mathematical errors, and the patient has not even arrived on the scene. During the administration, some product will be lost (spilled) from the needle - nobody knows how much of it is gone. Some will remain in the needle after the injection. Two more layers of logarithmically compounding errors.
And it’s not only about micrograms. They say there are xx billion active particles of that thing in each dose. Really? How did they count it? How? There is no mechanism anywhere to make such calculations. And then, to smart copy them from vial to vial and from dose to dose. It’s all fake. The numbers on the vials and on paper sheets are fake.
And the most important issue. This broil is done in 200-liter pots. The substrates are biological, active, impossible to measure by definition. Nobody knows what actually is in each boiling pot. Now, imagine the transition from 200 liters to 0.3 microgram. The very difference of magnitude forces errors as large as the solar system. Speaking about “quality” or “safety” of medical products created in this way (process) is beyond science fiction.
Consequently, all postmarketing data are false. There is no baseline, there is no reference to any uniform unit of measure, and this mess is compounded by the default variability of all vital parameters of all recipients. It’s all fiction.
The best part is that quite a number of folks try to figure out something “scientific” or “statistical” from this mess. Some of them are even perceived as heroes. All based on incomplete, skewed, false or fake data arbitrarily uploaded and doctored as needed.
“You want the quality? You can’t handle the quality!”