The Number Needed to Vaccinate (NNV) to prevent a single Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission in the UK – causes multiples of adverse events for every age cohort and dose
Late yesterday I posted this:
The excellent Expose-com has completed a deeper dive into the shockingly damaging injection harms of the C19 injections. Keep in mind that the so-called Joint Committee on Vaccines and Immunisation (JCVI) the regulatory authority (MHRA) and Health Minister and senior staff at the National Health Servcie (NHS) knew these details THREE MONTHS AGO and did not publicise the information that would have enabled those taking the injections INFORMED CONSENT
From the table in the Expose-News.com article linked below, here are tables that divide the NNV per cohort per dose by the one in 800 AESI rate for those vaccinated.
Note, the age and gender cohorts of AESI’s per age cohort from the shortened clinical trials is also being (CRIMINALLY – for informed consent purposes) withheld from two years ago.
First overall:
From the above table, for example, there are 110 adverse events of special interest (AESI’s) caused when preventing a single ICU admission in the UK amongst the 30-49 age cohort. This number rises to 272 adverse for the Omicron phase of the pandemic. We do not have a breakdown of whether the injuries caused are “severe” – life altering or “serious” – life threatening, though an ICU admission is not undertaken lightly.
The data is further broken down by risk group for the middle cohorts here:
I confess I struggle to get to the numbers for the “In a risk group” by eyeballing the overall numbers and the “No risk group” numbers. For example, there will not be many people in the 40-49 cohort in the “In a risk group” showing 12 adverse events caused by the NNV to prevent a single ICU admission and yet, there are 234 in the “No risk group” and 67 overall. There would need to be a ratio of 3 to 1 in the “In a risk group” to the “No risk group” for these numbers to make any sense.
Let’s leave that aside. From the table, for the 40-49 year “No risk group” – the vast majority of 40-49 year olds – the NNV has increased from 234 AESI’s to prevent a single ICU admission for the initial double dose protocol – to 238 for the booster – all the way up to 1,166 adverse events (AESI’s) to prevent a single ICU admission.
Just to stress that AESI’s have varying degrees of severity or seriousness, it is NOT “apples and apples” to compare an AESI event to an ICU admission, since we do not know the severity/seriousness of either the AESI event or the ICU admission.
Here is a link to the Expose-News.com article.
UK Health Officials know COVID Injections are useless and dangerous – The Expose (expose-news.com)
A table within the article shows how the NNV decreases to prevent a single ICU admission per age cohort. We do not have the equivalent numbers per age cohort for AESI’s from injections, just an estimate of the overall population adverse events of one adverse events per 800 “vaccinated”.
The tables I have compiled give a rough approximation of AESI harms by dividing each of the numbers in the table by 800 to get an approximation of harms (AESI’s) committed to prevent a single ICU admission.
We also do not know how rigorously the adverse events of special interest (AESI’s) were tested. For example, was there any testing of the presence of spike proteins in vital organs in either the injected or placebo groups during the clinical trials. Was the key test during the trials, the seroprevalence of C19 which was over-tested in placebo v injected group, but organ damage in neither group. What was in the placebo, the same as the injected group minus only the mRNA component of the injections (big pharma is used to constructing placebos of existing treatments, rather than no treatments of any kind in the placebo).
Of note, the AESI harms were PRE-INDICATED IN PFIZER’S PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIAL – in other words, the harmful outcomes were either negligently of wilfully committed since the roll-out of the injections and these results are CONFIRMING WHAT WAS KNOWN IN DECEMBER 2020.
See here:
The COVID-19 Inoculations - More Harm Than Good FINAL Video & Print (canadiancovidcarealliance.org)
Each of the injected and placebo groups had around 21,900 subjects.
A few closing comments.
We need the breakdown by manufacturer to evaluate which ahs the worse outcomes. At the 2 minute 10 mark of his video, Dr Campbell referred to each in his video in order to arrive at the one in 800 ratio – 15.1 per 10,000 for Moderna (one in 662 doses – not per vaccinated = two doses per course of initial protocol?) and 10.1 per 10,000 for Pfizer BioNTech (one in 990) to arrive at a one in 800 number for both. Note these results are ABOVE the placebo group.
I suggest that the information by manufacturer is being CRIMINALLY withheld by the regulators, since it denies INFORMED CONSENT (are the relative harms of 1/662 and 1/990 valid over the longer term rather than the truncated clinical trials (Pfizer’s trial was ended 30 November 2020 instead of 31 January 2021 - from a 31 July 2020 start date).
Referring to the above NNV table, here is a commentary in the Expose-News.com article
“For the covid vaccines, for healthy people aged 40-49, for example, 932,500 people would need an autumn booster in order to prevent a single intensive care admission. [In other words,] the chances of preventing an ICU admission were almost 1 in a million.”
Onwards!
I drink a lot of coffee – if you like my “stuff” but don’t want to pay for a subscription (that pays for food and internet!) buy me a cup to show (any!) appreciation here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan
So infuriating that they are still allowed to be.
Why are these “caregivers” still in power?