The politics around C19 is changing fast. The UK Government needs to receive the same kind of "nudge" it inflicted on its people

A longer than usual article, hopefully familiar to everyone, but, just in case!

Florida has convened a Grand Jury to investigate the entire C19 debacle. There is a petition in the UK for a Public Inquiry. Hopefully, the Grand Jury will be considering the factors outlined below plus others and the UK Petition is successful in accomplishing the same thing.

The UK Government has responded to petitioners seeking to “Launch a Public Inquiry into the approval process for covid-19 vaccines”

The full text of the petition is:

“We want the Government to launch a Public Inquiry to investigate the MHRA's process for approving covid-19 vaccines. This should consider all aspects of the approval process, including how approval was expedited and the drivers for expedition, and any potential conflicts of interests.”

Citizens or Resident in the UK can sign the petition here:

Launch a Public Inquiry into the approval process for covid-19 vaccines - Sign this petition - Petitions (parliament.uk)

The petition needs 100,000 signatures by 24 May 2023, it has almost 25,000 now. I am pretty sure that there are millions that would sign this petition – especially if they knew had lost loved ones, are part of victim support groups, patient advocacy groups, knew about the existence of such a petition, thought that the UK Government would have to account for its actions and those of its advisors.

The petition can be shared on Facebook, via Email, or Twitter -I urge Brits to sign and share if they have not done so already. We shall see if there is sufficient demand for the Public Enquiry (focussing on who created this debacle) and those who suffered from the lack of diligence, competence and oversight.

Remember that Prime Minister Sunak is on record stating one lesson he takes away from the pandemic is, “We shouldn’t have empowered the scientists in the way we did,” adding, “If you empower all these independent people, you’re screwed.”.

Check out this editorial from the cheer leaders for the imposition of martial law in the UK at the British Medical Journal.

Martial law under the control of a handful of people - Chief Medical and Science Officers Whitty and Vallance, an Emergency Act, an advisory group with no experience of pandemics or expertise in experimental viral vector/mRNA injections, or manufacturing scale-up quality controls for the injections and the Prime Minister. No parliamentary debate or approval – martial law.

Each measure used throughout the pandemic failed, from non-pharmaceutical (masks, social distancing, lockdowns) to pharmaceutical interventions (Remdesivir, Midazolam plus viral vector “vaccines” (Astra Zeneca) and mRNA “vaccines” (Moderna and Pfizer).

The petition does not explicitly highlight an enquiry into the instruction to use Midazolam plus Morphine treatment protocols or automatically place SUSPECTED C19 patients under “Do Not Resuscitate.” Remember, around 90% of those diagnosed with C19 using the RT-PCR test were FALSELY DIAGNOSED and were given Midazolam/Morphine for respiratory conditions anyway – both of which suppress respiration.

Thousands of people, mostly elderly, died in this way and were treated as C19 deaths. It would be more valid to categorise these deaths as “Died with Remdesivir/Midazolam/Morphine present” as it would be to categorise these deaths as “Died with C19 present”.

Similarly, thousands of people died within 2 weeks of injection and these deaths were treated as unvaccinated . These two features inflated the severity of C19 and reduced the deaths due to injections.

Here is the link to the response from the UK Government:

Launch a Public Inquiry into the approval process for covid-19 vaccines - Petitions (parliament.uk)

As with all things in the usual bureaucratic double speak used in politics, designed to confuse, distract from and obfuscate the key issues, you have to wade through a torrent of “cover your ass” jargon in rhe UK Government response. Plain English is the exception, not the rule.

The UK Government response leads with this statement:

“Public Inquiry

On 28 June 2022 the Prime Minister (Ed: Boris Johnson) published the Terms of Reference (ToR) for the UK COVID-19 Public Inquiry.

The ToR set out that the Inquiry will look at the development, delivery and impact of therapeutics and vaccines. The Inquiry is independent of the Government, the Department of Health and Social Care cannot comment on when, or to what extent, the Inquiry will focus upon vaccines.”

Nothing specific to C19 injections.

Under the embedded link in the parliament.uk web page there is at least this context which I am thinking the vast majority of the UK had no idea about – even if they were closely following the UK main street media on television or the press.

“The MHRA are primarily funded by fees from the pharmaceutical industry.

An expedited rolling review was used to grant temporary authorisations for the use of covid-19 vaccines.

Initial covid-19 vaccines were approved based on efficacy reducing illness from covid-19, whereas bivalent boosters have been approved based on immune response. Moderna Bivalent booster was approved despite lower efficacy than the original vaccine, and Pfizer BA.4-5 booster was approved using BA.1 data.

Public Assessment Reports for bivalent boosters have only been published months after the boosters were approved.”

You can read the response for yourselves at the above link, repeated here.

Keep in mind that the UK government withdrew all malaria and other treatments/medicines with any link to substances like Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin from all doctors, hospitals, chemists and on-line platforms like Amazon in March /April/May 2020 in order to “protect export markets” or some such jargon. (Brits could still get quinine in some tonic waters made by companies like Fever Tree (and no, I am not being paid to advertise!).

Also, the “expert advisory panel” (SAGE) was advising on untried, experimental treatments It received the same information that every country received via international protocols – namely the Phase 3 clinical trial results for Astra Zeneca, Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna – plus a few others treatments.

There has been hardly any coverage at all for the Astra Zeneca viral vector injection clinical trials – though we know now that the EUDRA system has 4-5 times the number of reports of death following the roll-out of this injection compared to the disastrous mRNA injections of Pfizer and Moderna. This lack of coverage probably resulted because Astra Zeneca did not receive Emergency Use Authorization in the US and Astra Zeneca was content to capture large slices of markets in the UK, the EU (initially), Australasia and the sub-continent.

This is an analysis of the Pfizer/BioNTech data that the UK MHRA and the expert advisory panel was given. The trials were unblinded months early and finished by the end of November 2020.

The COVID-19 Inoculations - More Harm Than Good FINAL Video & Print (canadiancovidcarealliance.org)

It has this table:

Unequivocal evidence of harm from the Phase 3 clinical trials of the Pfizer/BioNTech C19 mRNA injections, completely ignored by the UK health regulator and expert panel. The sole end point of the clinical trials was to reduce the severity of symptoms for the C19 disease. The clinical end points did not include a reduction in infection or transmission, or hospitalization or death. Only a reduction in the severity of symptoms (hence, turning everyone into asymptomatic super spreaders).

Sasha Latypova ripped the Moderna Phase 3 clinical trials to pieces – proving fraud.

Moderna Clinical Trials Terribly Flawed — And FDA Knew It, Former Pharma Executive Tells RFK, Jr. - CD Media (creativedestructionmedia.com)

The UK regulators and “experts” – who had no expertise in mRNA injections, let alone the SARS-COV2 virus itself – saw these results and should have said – “Not on your life or the millions of people in the UK I am responsible for” – but they didn’t. They turned a blind eye to the clear breaches of any and all safety measures evolved over decades, crossed their fingers and hoped for the best.

Then we had the Pfizer/BioNTech post-marketing authorization reports for the few months to end February 2021 (notas  much coverage of the post marketing authorization reports for Moderna/Astra Zeneca/JnJ). The UK expert panel should have received the same reports that the US FDA and Pfizer attempted to withhold for first, 55 years, then 75 years (more pages) but were given 6 months to release by a US judge after action by Aaron Siri – these reports are published here. (Note the FDA approved the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna injections just two weeks after the Phase 3 clinical trials ended).

Naomi Wolf and the Daily Clout team of 100’s of doctors, lawyers and others have been all over the post-marketing authorizations reports like a rash. Within those few months to February 2021, casualties were rolling in. Here is a summary table from here:

reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf (phmpt.org)

(The initial version had the number of doses redacted). “It is estimated that approximately 126,212,580 doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide from the receipt of the first temporary authorisation for emergency supply on 01 December 2020 through 28 February 2021.”

Note the sleight of hand that references “shipped” doses in the report, rather than “administered doses”. Almost all doses were shipped to the EU and US.

Using data from here and here, the actual Pfizer/BioNTech doses “administered” by end February 2021 was 29 million for the EU and 37 million for the US – a total of 66 million administered compared to 126 million “shipped”. The damage per dose needs to reflect doses administered NOT doses shipped.

Here is the table of harms taken from here:

reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf (phmpt.org)

What was the under-reporting factor for this report? 10, 20, 40, 70, 100?

The UK MHRA and “expert panel” should have seen this report well before the disclosure forced onto Pfizer and the FDA by the US judge. Remember it took months to force this disclosure in the US, there was no such restriction on the UK equivalent of the FDA – the MHRA. The MHRA and its expert panel had these results immediately.

From the table, note the 1,223 deaths, the 11,361 “Not Recovered”, 520 Recovered with sequelae,  9,400 “Unknown” outcomes, with the balance out of 42,086 recovering. (No news on what happened to these people after February 2020?).

The report also said this:

“Cumulatively, through 28 February 2021, there was a total of 42,086 case reports (25,379 medically confirmed and 16,707 non-medically confirmed) containing 158,893 events. Most cases (34,762) were received from United States (13,739), United Kingdom (13,404) Italy (2,578), Germany (1913), France (1506), Portugal (866) and Spain (756); the remaining 7,324 were distributed among 56 other countries.”

Ok, those are summaries of red flags that should have immediately halted the roll-out of injections at the Phase 3 clinical trail stages (that ended in November 2020) and the post-marketing authorization report stage that ended in February 2021.

The UK MHRA failed to act.

Now for the reports on the scale-up from a few tens of thousands of doses administered in clinical trials to the billions from a manufacturing process and a supply chain of dozens of companies plus the dethawing process NOT included in the clinical trials and the actual injection by medics that may or may NOT have properly prepared, administered or aspirated the injections (so as to ONLY inject into muscle mass, rather than directly into a blood vessel).

Don’t worry, I won’t go into detail. I will instead point to this prior post that complements the high quality work done months ago by Hadley Rees and Sasha Latypova.

I urge you to check out both these videos  – by Chris Martenson and the excellent Maria Gutschi. They are mind-boggling.

Excellent review by Chris Martenson of Jikkyleaks' new reveal (substack.com)

Maria Gutschi - Review of Quality Issues with mRNA Injections 5 Nov 2022 (bitchute.com)

Both highlight significant issues around the manufacturing quality and Maria posits that the spike protein that the body manufactures is 30% bigger than thw spike protein on the original “wild” virus amongst a host of other manufacturing quality control “fails”. Tellingly, there is no evidence that the bodies production of spike protein is the same.

Here is a reminder of harms from a global perspective of cases, doses and harms. The UK data is out of date and unreliable, so I have nor shown it.

Cumulative and Calendar Year Snap Shot of Global and US Cases, Deaths and Doses. 6.7 million C19 deaths, 21 million "vaccine deaths" (665m C19 "cases" v 1.95 billion injection injuries) (substack.com)

Lastly, for Moderna, how many Brits know that Moderna is a start-up company with no track record in producing any product, let alone at scale? Or that BioNTech is similarly inexperienced?

How many Brits are confident that they did not receive contaminated Moderna doses as Japan did?

Japan halts 1.6 million Moderna Covid vaccine doses over contamination concerns (cnbc.com)

How many Brits know that Moderna was raided by the FDA and found wanting in three important aspects?

FDA unearths a minefield of quality issues at the contractor manufacturing Moderna's jabs (substack.com)

“OBSERVATION 1

Your firm failed to thoroughly investigate any unexplained discrepancy or failure of a batch or any of its components to meet any of its specifications, whether or not the batch has already been distributed.

OBSERVATION 3

Control procedures are not established which monitor the output and validate the performance of those manufacturing processes that may be responsible for causing variability in characteristics of the in-process material and the drug product.

OBSERVATION 4

Acceptance criteria for the sampling and testing conducted by the quality control unit is not adequate to ensure that batches of the drug product meet appropriate statistical quality control criteria as a condition for their approval and release.”

Onwards! Nudge your politicians! It won’t take much!

Thanks to my subscribers, don’t forget to subscribe if you are able and willing, or buy me a coffee here if you liked the article!     https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan