The Two Swords of Damocles hanging over the heads of humanity – cause and effect of one sword held by the UN’s WHO – the other sword is the UN’s IPCC

Setting aside the global military industrial complex - who have a desperate need to promote kinetic wars – there are two emerging “de facto” global tyrannies within the United Nations (UN) – the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) .

No elected government anywhere in the world campaigned on a platform of delegating responsibility for health or climate (or military) policy, priorities and outcomes) to the WHO or anybody else. Health budgets in countries like the UK make up 40% of many nations’ taxes/spending. The biggest component of taxes/spending. The WHO wants 5% of every countries health spending to be allocated to pandemic preparedness, not 1%, or 2% - 5%.

Let’s start with the actions and inactions of the WHO which directly or indirectly caused tens of millions of deaths, billions of harms (multiple per person) and saved very few, if any, with nothing more than happy coincidence.

Much will be familiar but it is worth repeating to keep what is at stake, front and centre in order to prevent the imposition of tyranny by egotistical, narcissistic and incompetent maniacs who value hubris above excellence and virtue.

The WHO is seeking to change International Health Regulations (IHR) and instigate a Pandemic Treaty (PT) that puts the WHO firmly in charge of the taxes and discretionary spending s of every country on tha planet. It claims it has learned lessons from the mistakes it made during the C19 pandemic that only the WHO is competent to put into practice.

It does not articulate what these mistakes were. Neither does it make a case for why the changes to IHR or the creation of a PT will deliver better outcomes. Once passed, as seems inevitable, given there is no democratic process or accountability for past mistakes, it will become the law of the land in 194 countries.

Most importantly, the WHO has no experience of managing national health systems, let alone a global one. Yet it seeks to direct the efforts of every national health system on the planet. People in most countries are all too familiar with medical malpractice, long waiting lists for essential and elective treatments, overworked and underpaid nursing staff, overpaid and inefficient health bureaucrats – and yet, the WHO can “direct” national health systems to do a better job, simply by upgrading its surveillance and compliance capabilities?

Of course the geo-political implications are massive. The WHO will decide if Russia will deploy US made injections to its people ahead of any that Russia or its allied develops. China will have to accept masks made in India if the WHO so decides. Test kits made in Russia may be stipulated to be used in Ukraine (or vice versa), Iran’s nose swabs may be mandated in Israel – the potential to antagonise and exacerbate geo political tensions is huge.

And all the while, the WHO will be the arbiter of hundreds of billions of profits by companies like Pfizer and Moderna who have no compunction in making blood money from a global catastrophe.

The Director General of The WHO will become the “Global King of Health” with a court of unelected advisers whose competence is not even 1,000^th the qualifications, expertise, wisdom and experience of the world’s leading and uncorrupted health professionals.

The mistakes are legion.  I am not a medic, so I am sure there are medics that would disagree! Here are a few off the top of my head.

1.      advocating for testing using a faulty Drosten RT-PCR test to claim “detection = infectiousness”

2.      failure to highlight that asymptomatic spread is almost non-existent

3.      failure to encourage open debate of policies rather than imposition of bad policies

4.      failure to highlight the risks of interaction of C19 injections with existing treatments for non-C19 conditions

5.      failure to point out that instructing the body to produce the very spike protein that caused C19 disease had no track record of success (like injecting snake bite in case you get bitten by a snake) rather than injecting the antibodies that fight the spike protein using the usual “anti-venom” procedures

6.      failure to point out that injecting the elderly and infirm who have almost non-existent immune systems whilst expecting an immune system response is not logical

7.      Ignoring decades of evidence of useless and harmful masking, by advocating masks

8.      advocacy of economy-destroying lock-downs,

9.      failure to point out the benefits of early treatment,

10.   failure to point out that not diagnosing the usually seen non-C19 conditions posed severe health risks

11.   failure to censure the use of internment camps for the unvaxxed and uninfected,

12.   endorsement of the use of lethal treatment protocols (Remdesivir and Midazolam plus morphine)

13.   denial of proven treatment protocols like IVM and HCQ or even vitamin supplements,

14.   failure to advocate against the brutal psychological torture of the elderly

15.   failure to compare and contrast country experiences between best and worst outcomes,

16.   failure, to this day, to highlight the differences in outcomes for different treatments and injections

17.   the advocacy of experimental injections using deadly delivery mechanisms that failed clinical trials, failed post marketing authorization standards and have been exposed as being manufactured with bacteria and DNA present.,.

All these failings have resulted in massive leaps in extra deaths. These deaths are the tip of the on-going genocide as severe (life altering) and serious (life threatening) health conditions have been created in massive numbers.

The US has seen a step increase in deaths of 20% per annum since 2019. This is the cost in lives of embracing WHO policies and mixing it with the perverse incentives of incompetent and brutal local, city, state and federal government. illustrated here:

United States Deaths in 2022, How Many Deaths in United States 2022 | Dead or Kicking

The US death rate is the red line, the blue is total US deaths – green is US population.

Deaths with C19 present for the US for 2022 were around 270,000 with fewer than (usually, but probably less than) 5% with only (Omicron) C19 present as cause of death. The other more than half a million deaths represents conditions caused by the C19 injections, or, in my non-medical opinion, by interaction with other drugs used to treat non-C19 conditions such as heart, cancer, diabetes ADD, autism, Alzheimer’s , depression and so on.

The health authorities in the US do not regard this as remotely interesting, not even worthy of a comment. After all, they were only following instructions.

Countries implemented the WHO’s destructive, harmful and ineffective policies VOLUNTARILY under existing IHR and no PT. Now the WHO is seeking the power to MANDATE all the failures leading to mass deaths and harms according to the whim of a dictator who is the King of Health. In today’s upside down world that means the “King of Death”.

Even Josef Mengele did not roll-out his experiments indiscriminately across the globe. The WHO did because at its root, it is “all care and no responsibility”.

Steve Kirsch asked the question on his SubStack “Is it Safe”, referring to C19 injections, stating that “safe” means one in a million chance of death.

Of course, it is a leading question. I put a reply in the comments section of Steve’s article, that Pfizer engaged in a sleight of hand in the report here reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf (phmpt.org)

Pfizer showed 42,000 adverse event reports with 1,200 deaths from 126 million doses SHIPPED, rather than my estimate from doses going almost entirely to the EU and around the US of just 65 million for the (short) three months to end February 2021.

The post marketing experience report also showed 9,000 unknown outcomes and more than 25% of the 42,000 adverse events as “Unrecovered”. The actual reported chance of death BEFORE the “unknowns” and “Unrecovered” drops from an already high 10 in a million for doses SHIPPED to 18 in a million for doses actually administered.

I omitted an important factor in my comment on Steve’s article. What was the Under Reporting Factor (URF) ? Did Pfizer reject all adverse event reports within 14 days of injection, because “the injections could not possibly have cause the adverse event, trust me”? A URF as low as 20, would raise the chance of death to 360 per million, way in excess of any definition of “safe” as one in a million chance of death.

Ok, I’m off to get some coffee, I ran out and am feeling a strong urge to nap!

Onwards!

Please upgrade to paid, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan  - Buying just one Ko-Fi a week  for $3 is 50 bucks more than an annual $100 subscription!