11 Comments
User's avatar
Andy Bunting's avatar

Thanks PH.

I see below the mink culls. Bit of a story to ferret out! But the mink were vaccinated against some whatever mink disease. All fine initially. The when the mink were exposed to the wild virus again. They dropped dead rapidly. Wasn't really a cull. Just shovelings their cold dead bodies into burn pits.

Ring any bells yet? Yes exactly the same reaction by the injected, when they get reinfected with covid & get serious reactions & drop dead.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Schneider's avatar

Boy! They are bound to kill EVERY living thing if they have their way!!! Smh

Expand full comment
Peter Halligan's avatar

Exactly. It is not as if the experiment on humans has proven out yet and they want to extend it to animals.

Expand full comment
Kitsune, Maskless Crusader.'s avatar

Along similar lines just read a headline stating that rats in NYC carry the virus. Had a big argument 2+ years ago with a Covidian when I told them that there are reports that animals are carrying it and if so, then no length of lockdowns would be able to stop the virus. He said that there was no proof that there was a reservoir for the virus outside of humans. Strange I though at the time for someone to make such a statement as it was them being shouted from everywhere that it cam from bats. We also discussed the culling of mink, if I am not mistaken, in Europe and that deer where found to carry it.

I find it funny how despite the fact that is was first reported to have come from wild animals and if that was the case, then lockdowns could not serve their stated purpose, those pushing for lockdowns vehemently denied that they was an animal reservoir for the virus. However, during the lockdowns they went around killing pets, rescued animals and culling various live stock and now they are telling us that animals do carry it.

Expand full comment
kerrylyn's avatar

Yes, the mink culling was done in Denmark I think. They also killed lots of rescue dogs in Australia for fear of contamination and in England they were considering during early stages of plandemic of euthanizing all pet cats in the country as they found one cat to be infected, this according to a UK politician.

Expand full comment
Kitsune, Maskless Crusader.'s avatar

But, no animal reservoir for the virus, which would render lockdowns meaningless.

This, to me, is no different from having to open windows at school in the winter to allow air flow while simultaneously requiring plastic barriers between students to prevent air flow. Not just at school, actually.

We have more than ample evidence that the best response to anything they say is to ignore it. Ignore everything they say.

Expand full comment
Lloyd Miller's avatar

On Health puts human on the same level and value of all parts of the BioSphere on Gaia. Expect to be sacrificed.

Expand full comment
Lloyd Miller's avatar

Also reports of animals dying after being given the Covid vaxxx.

Expand full comment
Gretchen's avatar

I've read several newspaper articles of "suddenly died" K9s over the last few months. I remember reading about zoo animals and K9s being given the C19 injections and wondering wtf?

Expand full comment
DogsLife's avatar

"The “One Health” approach summarises a concept that has been known for more than a century; that human, animal and plant health are interdependent and bound to the health of the ecosystems in which they exist. We envisage and implement it as a collaborative, whole of society, whole of government approach to understanding, anticipating and addressing risks to global health."

They equate humans with animals and plants. Here's a peek: https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/global-initiatives/one-health/

Expand full comment
Peter Halligan's avatar

It is certainly better to live in harmony with nature than it is to pollute it. I get the sense though that those backing the One Health agenda are motivated by profit and control - not the higher ideal.

Expand full comment