Using Brave AI, a statin is described as:
“A statin is a class of medications used to lower cholesterol levels in the blood. They work by:
· Reducing the amount of cholesterol produced by the liver
· Helping the liver remove excess cholesterol from the blood
Statins are commonly prescribed for individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease or those with high LDL cholesterol levels.
They are effective in reducing LDL cholesterol and triglycerides, while increasing high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, also known as “good” cholesterol.
Most people who take statins tolerate them well, but some may experience side effects such as headaches, insomnia, or skin flushing.
Overall, statins are a widely used and effective medication class for managing cholesterol levels and reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease.
Here are Brave answers to “which medicines have clear harms compared to their side effects” and “which medicines have clear benefits compared to their side effects”, statins are the top of a list of three for both!
For harms:
· Statins: These cholesterol-lowering medications have been linked to increased risk of muscle damage, liver enzyme elevation, and cognitive impairment. While they may benefit some patients, the potential harms may outweigh the benefits for others.
The other two treatments listed by Brave are “Over-the-counter pain relievers” and “Incontinence medications”.
For benefits:
· Statins: Despite potential side effects like muscle pain and liver enzyme elevation, statins have been shown to significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks, strokes, and cardiovascular mortality. Their benefits in preventing cardiovascular events outweigh their risks for most patients.
The other two medicines shown by Brave are “Antibiotics” and “Blood thinners”.
There is no mention of the interaction of these treatments with the experimental C19 mRNA injections or any other medication or procedure.
Out of interest, from here in June 2024:
https://www.webmd.com/heart-disease/news/20240627/many-people-on-statins-may-not-need-them
“As a result, the number of adults meeting the criteria for statin use dropped from 45.4 million to 28.3 million. So, based on these equations, 17.3 million adults for whom statins are now recommended would no longer be considered eligible. That includes 4.1 million adults who are currently taking statins.”
The paper’s lead author, Timothy S. Anderson, MD, an assistant professor at the University of Pittsburgh, went further in an interview for a news story in The Journal of the American Medical Association. Not only did he favor updating the guidelines, but he gave a timeline for when he thinks that will happen. The American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology are scheduled to release new high blood pressure and cholesterol guidelines later this year and in 2025, respectively, he said, and he expects new guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (or disease in the heart or blood vessels) to follow those changes.”
Brave struggled to answer the question “how many Americans used statins in the USA in 2023” – but came up with this:
· Another study, published in 2024 (June), mentions that more than 45 million Americans are considered eligible to take statin drugs to prevent heart disease, based on the 2013 pooled cohort equations. However, this figure refers to eligibility, not actual usage in 2023.
A news article from NPR, published in December 2023, reports on a study finding that only one-third of people eligible to take statins are actually using them. This study analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey over the last 10 years, but it doesn’t provide a specific 2023 figure.
One third of 45 million eligible to take statins equals 15 million Americans taking statins.
I confess to coming to a conclusion that all medicines should be treated with a lot of caution! I can see clear benefits from the treatment of wounds or even transplants or appendicitis, snake bite, tetanus, and the use of antibiotics to kill all “biotics” – good and bad – while the body heals, but there doesn’t appear to be any “vaccines” that have been tested properly, or treatments that show no interaction with other simultaneous treatments!
Onwards!!!
Please take a paid subscription or forward this article to those you think might be interested. You can also donate via Ko-fi – any amount from three dollars upwards. Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan
This presentation of medical science information highlights the biggest flaw in medical science. It narrows the universe of understanding health.
First it requires one to accept the premise of cholesterol risk. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't a significant risk factor? Maybe it's a trailing indicator of another condition inside the body system, not a leading indicator?
And importantly, the debate presented is questions over safety vs. efficacy in the product. Without presentation of other products, manufactured, natural, lifestyle choices, etc that have their own effectiveness and safety profiles.
Medical science devolves into this paradigm. So fixated on one product without regard for the entire universe of other possibilities. If, say, a regimen of chia seeds, high antioxidant berries and exercise is equally effective/higher/slightly less effective AND has near zero risk associated with it why would anyone choose a product with negligible comparative efficacy accompanied by significantly higher risk?
Medical science as we know it today is burdened by blinders. Intentionally placed on it. Under the false and dangerous belief that only research into brand new products that can be patented and sold are viable for health. Not coincidentally at great profit to the researchers and their investors.
I was recently offered them by GP as annual blood test showed apparently too high 'bad' cholestrol. I'd read up a bit earlier. The levels thought OK at one time had been lowered, like "normal" BP range, meeaning more people on meds for life! A few studies showed if you took them for 20 years, you may live 4 months longer. Also, I read, the brain needs fat and it is reduced with statins. Recall the AI said they can cause cognitive impairment (dementia?). Together with annual flu shots, (aluminium poisoning), could they be the real reasons for big increases in dementia patients?