
Discover more from Peter’s Newsletter
To win the war against the “Cult of Moloch”, objectives need to be set - Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound -. SMART objectives
Once set, a strategy can be formed with leaders to plan, lead, organise and control (PLOC) resources to meet the SMART objectives
We will each have our own views of what these SMART objectives might be.
For me, the “primary objective” would be:
Replace “vaccines” as a priority for health, with healthy food, exercise, sanitation and education in scholastic fields, not woke grooming and the discrimination of DEI
This is my version of the “primary objective” to do this, there are many supporting objectives. Amongst them would be:
Replace regulators enabling “vaccines” with those supporting the primary objective
Replace politicians that enable “vaccines” with those supporting the primary objective
Replace the financing of “vaccines” with those supporting the primary objective
Establish health metrics for national health that identify and reduce adverse trends and increase QUALITY life years
Make deaths from clinical treatments beyond a “placebo” a criminal offence
Abolish all medical patents
Right away , you can see how the development of SMART objectives requires co-operation with others, like you! Assuming that these objectives could be set, we would have the starting point of a strategy. Once that was formed and we could formulate a plan, appoint leaders who would organize and control resources and engage in the tactics necessary to meet the strategy,
Eight now, I see an “emergent” rather than a “planned” approach to strategy. There are now hundreds of organisations spread around the world that focus on specific or broader goals, mostly seeking legal redress for harms inflicted, freedoms denied or “Cult” resistance - (resistance to cultural changes that seek to enforce “State before individual”.
Much of this emergent strategy results in the duplication of effort to achieve the same objective, not always making use of the same available resources. Resources like evidence and science – resulting in wasted time, money and effort.
Right now, the time, money and effort needed to meet the primary objective is subsumed in existing institutions and infrastructure.
Let’s take a look at the “alphabet letter swamp” of US health institutions to see just how much time, money and effort are being misdirected and already exist.
Here are links to organizational charts for the key health agencies: The staff and budget numbers were found using Bing searches with the (changing) terms “how many people are employed by the US NIH) and “US NIH budget” – and are, of course, subject to any propaganda!
The budget numbers do not reflect all revenues from items such as royalties and bribes paid by big Pharma.
HHS – 10,000 staff, In the fiscal year of 2024, the budget for the Department of Health and Human Services is expected be about 1.74 trillion U.S. dollars. In comparison,
Now, it may be that the HHS budget includes the budgets of the “alphabet swamp” of the letter agencies listed below. Certainly the staff numbers suggest it doesn’t, but the budget is so large compared to the “meagre” total 74 billion bucks the issue is somewhat moot.
Click on the links – for those that want some homework, see how many overlaps you can spot or where – if you threw all the org charts onto one page, how you could structure an alternative organization from scratch – using a “zero budget” as a starting point.
These resources exist for the “good guys” to use as well, if they gain control and remove the stench of the swamp.
HHS Organizational Charts Office of Secretary and Divisions | HHS.gov
FDA – 16,000 staff. Budget for 2023 – 8.4 billion
CDC – 11,000 staff. Budget - 11.5 billion
NIH – 19,000 staff. Budget – 48 billion
OD Organizational Chart (nih.gov)
NIAID – Staff numbers are secret - Budget 6 billion – assuming 50% split staff/non-staff and a 300,000 cost per staff, maybe 10,000 staff?
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Organizational Chart (nih.gov)
How much of the functions and roles of each division are duplicated? Tech, admin, HR – leave aside the specialist divisions on DEI etc.
These are the resources that will be subordinated to the diktats of the WHO once international health regulations are passed in May 2024.
But we needn’t stop there.
Every major country and regional authority like the EU replicate these resources to a greater or lesser extent.
The duplication of effort, time and resources is massive. This is not “primary health care. It is bureaucracy and grift.
These resources can be changed to meet my primary directive - resulting in a global extension of quality life years for the human population of the world.
These resources are what the WHO seeks to dominate and direct.
WHO = World Health Organization. Injecting people is NOT healthy and WHO doesn’t seek to “Organize” world health also has an agenda of paedophilia. Think about that. it seeks to inject and pervert the world. By force – using psychological and physical means as necessary, The Cult of Moloch.
The prize for those objecting to the Cult is a return to making people healthy, wealthy and wise. The cost is disease, poverty and stupidity.
Who can co-ordinate the people of quality necessary to take back control of improving health outcomes rather than locking in a deterioration that has persisted for decades in the US and other health infrastructure across the world?
Maybe the World Council for Health? Sounds global. The WHO is seeking global domination funded by AN ADDITIONAL 5% of existing health budgets plus a share of global GDP. 5% of the 7% of 20 trillion of global GDP spent on health = 420 billion bucks. Each ¼% of global GDP is another 300 billion bucks.
Maybe the co-ordination of global resources by the “good guys” could parachute in quality people and funding from the hundreds of organizations acting independently.
Maybe it would be better to focus on legal aspects – with a team of legal eagles sourced globally into a team of super paralegals!
Maybe these could be sponsored by co-ordinating nutrition or holistic or natural remedy companies around the world.
Maybe charities could be persuaded to direct some resources on the basis of improving long term outcomes for the people they are helping.
That money could be saved from existing health budgets of all countries and redirected to improving quality life years.
Food for thought – or rather quality health for people!
Onwards!
Please buy a subscription or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 coffee a week!
To win the war against the “Cult of Moloch”, objectives need to be set - Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound -. SMART objectives
You do NOT want these two; “Make deaths from clinical treatments beyond a “placebo” a criminal offence” nor “Abolish all medical patents”.
Something similar to the first, “Make deaths from clinical treatments beyond a “placebo” a criminal offence” exists in Japan. It makes hospitals extremely reluctant to accept patients who most need medical care, those in life or death health circumstances. It leads to what the Japanese call “Taraimawash”-the “Run Around”. Hospitals accept responsibility for the patient”s outcome once they accept the patient. If they refuse a patient who later dies, oh well. The refusing hospital/s are not responsible. Here are some articles I have collected over the years that back up my statements. My comments are in ( ), some of which add additional information not directly connected to this issue but may be of interest.
Refusal of service
8.3% of Tokyo emergency cases refused by multiple hospitals The Japan Times: Feb. 24, 2009
24,089 cases of multiple ER snubs last year The Japan Times: March 12, 2008
30-hospital denial fatal to woman The Japan Times: Dec. 29, 2007
82-year-old woman turned away by five hospitals dies The Japan Times: Nov. 15, 2008
Crash victim refused by 14 hospitals dies The Japan Times: Feb. 5, 2009
Pensioner Dies After Being Denied Treatment at 25 Different Hospitals Mar 6, 2013
Hospitals in Tokyo refusing flu patients The Japan Times: May 6, 2009 (Not just for covid and not new either, folks.)
Hospitals turn away patients at record rate The Japan Times: July 24, 2011
(Keep in mind this is the denial of a service that those denied have already paid for.)
Doctor Shortages
Doctor shortage gives patients runaround The Japan Times: April 12, 2008
Hospital doctors feeling the strain The Japan Times: April 12, 2008
Hospital's docs quit over pay cut The Japan Times: Nov. 1, 2008
Shortage of rural doctors worsens The Japan Times:, April 23, 2009
Planned cut in doctors’ overtime hours worries Japan’s rural hospitals Japan Times May 6.
Doctor’s suicide after monthly overtime exceeded 200 hours recognized as work-related The Japan Times, Date Unknown
A doctor in the house? Do you feel lucky? The Japan Times: Nov. 15, 2008
Hospitals need 24,000 doctors to ease manpower shortage, study shows
The Japan Times: Sept. 30, 2010
Provincial areas experiencing doctor shortages The Japan Times: June 1, 2010
Hospitals stretched to the breaking point The Japan Times: March 13, 2011 (To anyone currently panicking over the Japanese hospitals being overwhelmed by covid, if you’d been paying attention then you would not be surprised.)
If you build an emergency room, they will come The Japan Times: July 29, 2009
Students shun nursing care The Japan Times: Sept. 2, 2008 Wonder why?
EPAs clearing way for foreign caregivers The Japan Times: May 21, 2008 (What? Japan is importing health care professionals? Why? Oh…..)
Solutions (!?!)
Hospital closures eyed in reform plan The Japan Times: April 29, 2009
Abe-led government panel suggests reducing hospital beds to cut costs Oct. 29, 2019 (Yes, everyone knows the solution to turning away patients is to reduce the number of hospital and beds, which is the most common reason given for turning patients away.).
Cancer
Japan fatally behind curve on cervical cancer The Japan Times: June 27, 2008
Doctor scarcity hurting cancer care for women The Japan Times: Jan. 29, 2009
Less than 40% of adults get cancer screening: poll The Japan Times: Nov. 27, 2007
Breast cancer threat ignored Deaths rising but menace kept off the radar: advocate
The Japan Times: Sept. 23, 2005
Quality
Hospitals reused syringes on 10,000 patients The Japan Times: June 5, 2008
Reuse of blood-check devices widespread The Japan Times: Aug. 8, 2008
67 hepatitis B patients sue the state The Japan Times: July 31, 2008 (The above case is not the first time needle have been reused. This is the fallout from a previous instance.)
Hospital topped radiation limit for kids' exams The Japan Times: Sep. 2, 2011
Hospital death exposes 'tip of malpractice iceberg' The Japan Times: Jan. 31, 2006
Medical Education
Doctors cite ‘necessary evil’ of med school exam-rigging Asahi Shimbum August 9, 2018 (This one is an important read. Exams were rigged to hinder female applicants to med. Schools. The “why” is important.)
Childbirth
A medical travesty in Nara (From The Japan Times Sept. 4 issue) A must read.
Woman with brain hemorrhage left untreated for an hour The Asahi Shimbun Oct 21/22 2006 Another must read.
Hospitals need 1,000 more ICU beds for babies, ministry says The Japan Times: July 26, 2008 (Lack of hospital beds are often cited as the reason for turning patients away, especially pregnant women. Remember the article above on the planned reduction in the number of beds to reduce costs.)
Nearly half of perinatal centers short on full-time doctors: poll The Japan Times: Oct. 30, 2008
Obstetricians log 300-hour months The Japan Times: Nov. 1, 2008
Miscarriage rate found unexpectedly high The Japan Times: Aug. 3, 2009
Yes, these are old articles. While not every year, I do periodically assign med students to see if any progress has been made. The last was in 2020, I believe. ZERO progress made on any of these.
If you adopt the second of these, “Abolish all medical patents”, then you’ll see more of this.
Foreign drugmakers closing labs in Japan, moving over to China The Japan Times: July 28, 2008 (Not just foreign companies. Japanese drugmakers have also moved some manufacturing overseas too. Result of price controls. Eventually, the cost to make them domestically becomes greater than what the government will allow them to charge for them.)
While the direct reason differs, the result will be the same; R&D will cease as new drug development will be a massive loss for whoever continues it. Patents are important to all who hold them but more so for pharmaceutical products. Unlike the patents for many over items, certain for copyrights for literature, music and film, pharmaceutical patents expire in a very short time. Given the extremely high costs of research, building and maintaining and certifying facilities and personnel that far far exceed those of products enjoying patent/copyright protects of much longer duration, we have the perversely high cost of medicine and medical devices. Abolishing what protection they have will abolish new medicine development. You can not expect anyone to work for free, not a street sweeper, not a pharmaceutical researcher. You’re certainly can not force them into the red. The solution would be to extend the length of patent protection so that the patent holders have more than a mere decade, give or take a year or two, to recoup what they spent on R&D before they have to just give their work to a generic drug maker who spent zero on research for the drug. Oh, and hopefully have some left over to help fund R&D into other medications.
None of these objectives will last long because the new crop of bureaucrats and Representatives will be corrupted by their self interest by bribery through donation and blackmail. We need to do away with giving a group of people wrongs as rights completely and allow the Free Market to control corrupt business.