Discover more from Peter’s Newsletter
UK and New Zealand continue to pay doctors extra to inject unsafe and ineffective C19 mRNA injections without informing those getting injected of the risks and harms
The continued use of the injections themselves is in direct contravention of the Nuremberg Code
New Zealand has elections next month and the ruling Labour Party is likely to be shown the door to the back alley with the trash bins.
The likely incoming National Party has the chance to reverse course and remove all the protocols that have inflicted untold harms on the majority of kiwis, but instead is persisting with the same deadly policies of its soon to be predecessor.
One of those is incentivizing doctors to inject their patients with experimental toxins that have proven to be deadly and cause organ damage.
It is not just the NZ government that is engaging in the practice of incentivising medics to poison people with an experimental dose that is proved to cause more harm than good, without testing for quality or knowing the ingredients or compensating victims for the deaths and harms caused.
The UK government does the same – and probably so do many other countries. Anyone have numbers for the US, EU, Canada, Australia and other countries?
“WITH the opposition National Party favourite to win next month’s election, leader Christopher Luxon and health spokesman Dr Shane Reti have promised financial incentives to doctors if they administer Covid vaccination to 95 per cent of those registered in their practice.
As well as standard payments, which were $75 (£36) per jab during the pandemic, under National’s plan doctors will be paid an additional $10-per-person bonus so long as they can persuade 95 per cent of eligible patients to receive jabs by June next year. This compares with the UK’s payment to GPs of £10.06 per jab, reduced this month to £7.54.”
The C19 mRNA injections are still an experiment and the experiment is evolving with harms clearly exceeding those of the disease itself.
For reference here are passages from the Nuremburg code which the governments of the UK and NZ are contravening with malice aforethought of the known consequences and harms:
“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.
This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.”
Please buy a subscription or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 coffee a week!