Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Neural Foundry's avatar

The accountability gap here is pretty striking. Half a trillion in commitments without fresh electoral mandates seems like a real oversight in democratic process, regardless of where one stands on the housing needs themselves. I've seen similar tensions play out locally where infrastructure decisions get rushed through before elections can reset council dynamics. The timing around boundary changes creating this window really does raise questions about deliberate strategy versus administrative coincidence. When councils can lock in multi-decade financial commitmetns while insulated from voter feedback, that's a structural problem beyond any single party's agenda.

Sherry 1's avatar

Unbelievable. The grift must be massive, how many are taking how much of these tax monies as the development proposals are passed along? The amounts do NOT make sense. It is a transfer of wealth and it is no coincidence that the boundaries being redrawn right at this massive spending time result in elections being postponed. That is insane.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?