Unable to cross-post – An article from Tess Lawrie on the grooming of children under the guise of sex-ed by the WHO and how Rutgers enforces its application

Why should sexual groomers of children be allowed to set sex-ed standards? Do parents who hold religious views on this topic agree that their beliefs should be replaced by these child sex groomers and paedophiles in the WHO and schools for children aged 3 and up?

From here:

Stopping pedophilia, pornography and child sexual abuse (substack.com)

Opening paragraphs:

“The most difficult societal issue that needs to be acknowledged and addressed is the escalating sexual abuse of children. Such abuse includes child rape, torture and trafficking, as well as woke ideology-facilitated genital mutilation.

The issue of child sexual abuse is challenging for a variety of reasons, not least because many of us have experienced psychological or physical abuse as children and have not healed these traumas for ourselves.

With paedophilia linked to the globalist cabal calling themselves the ‘elites’, it is clear that the hierarchy exploiting us also have the degradation and exploitation of our children in their sights.

Aiming to introduce their sex (mis)education in schools for children as young as three years of age through policies and content dictated by unaccountable supranational organisations, like the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Sexual and Reproductive Health and the Rutgers Foundation, the exploitation and sexualisation of our school-going children is about to become institutionalised.”

“According to Rutgers’ “gender-transformation” webpage: “Rutgers’ gender-transformative approach examines, questions and transforms rigid gender and sexual norms...”.

Please click the link above for the full Tess Lawrie’s SubStack article.

For a little more context not directly referenced by Tess, see here:

BZgA_Standards_FAQ_EN.pdf (bzga-whocc.de)

Answer to Question 5 of FAQ the were formulated in a 2010 policy paper here:

Standards for Sexuality Education |  BZgA WHO-CC (bzga-whocc.de)

“5. Why start sexuality education at an early age?

Sexuality education is a lifelong process, but it is most essential during childhood and adolescence.

If sexuality education begins at a young age, it can be proactive and help to guard against future misinformation.

It gradually equips and empowers children and young people with information, skills and positive values so that they can understand and enjoy their sexuality, have safe and full[1]filling relationships when they are ready and take responsibility for their own and other people’s sexual health and well-being.”

Got that? “equips and empowers children.. understand and enjoy their sexuality..”

Children, at an early age.

Whatever happened to “wait until you are older”?

“For instance, when a 3-year-old asks “where babies come from”, he/she needs different information from a child at a later stage of development.

In the age group 0-4, the pedagogical aim that children should acquire an attitude of “respect for gender equality” means that they should learn that boys and girls are equal in terms of their rights as human beings.”

Pedagogical? More like Ped-o-gogical! You can see there’s a revision about to happen – “gender equality”??? “boys and girls” will soon be replaced by “boys, girls and pre-ops”.

Question 6 in the FAQ has this:

“6. According to some critics, the Standards promote “masturbation” and “playing doctors” in children from age 1 to 4 and encourage 6 year old children to “explore same[1]sex relationships”. Is this true?

As mentioned, it is considered crucial that sexuality education is age-appropriate. Therefore, the Standards include information about the typical developmental stages of children.

This information is addressed to professionals (e.g. teachers, including kindergarten teachers), who need to be informed about the variety of normal phenomena in the psychosexual development of children including, in fact, early childhood masturbation and “doctor” games.

Without such knowledge, there is a risk that professionals will react in inappropriate ways, possibly harming the child and/or hindering his/her future healthy development. The Standards therefore inform professionals about how to deal with these phenomena in a high-quality sexuality education programme in a develop[1]mentally appropriate way. “

Here is how that WHO child grooming way is being implemented in two states in Germany.

(100) Two German childcare centres in Nordrhein-Westfalen issue child sexuality manifestos, waxing poetic about the benefits of masturbation and outlining rules for child sexual play (substack.com)

“The recent reports all come from an article published yesterday in Welt:

Children should be able to “withdraw into a protected space” “to discover and satisfy themselves physically,” proclaims a day-care centre in Kerpen. In its sexual education plan, the institution promises to offer “children free space to experiment with their childlike sexuality. Masturbation is normal. Allowing masturbation” in day-care centres is “of great importance.”

In a day-care centre in Rheinberg, allowances are made for playing doctor in side rooms – but with rules for the little ones: “They [should] carefully choose the child to play with.” And before they do so, “the children are told that no objects are to inserted into bodily orifices (e.g. genitals),” according to their plan, which was recently made public by Alternative für Deutschland.”

Rutgers and other “progressive” schools that embrace the Cult of Moloch may be adopting these WHO endorsed paedophilic standards without parents knowledge – because the WHO says this = “education”.

This is the same WHO staffed by corrupt quacks that said “all deaths with C19 present are to classified as C19 deaths”, “Ivermectin and HCQ are contra-indicated”, “use crap RT-PCR tests, lockdown and isolate” and “take these experimental, unproven and known to be toxic injections that are poorly made with no quality controls”.

And they should set standards in education - SEX education for kids from 3 years old and up????

Makes you wonder how directing kids away from what has been considered “normal” towards what used to considered bestial and deviant is also being reflected in everything else being taught to kids.

Little 6 year old Johnny: “Please Miss, may Karen and I be excused from doing sums? We want to masturbate each other.”

Teacher with rainbow coloured hear, body piercings and tattoos: “Of course, Johnny. Don’t penetrate Karen so deeply this time and make sure no-one can see you.”

Onwards!

Please buy a subscription or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 coffee a week!