Under-reporting of decades of vaccine adverse events – not just C19 mRNA injections

The analysis of clinical trial data and adverse events following the roll-out of C19 mRNA injections exceeds that of all other vaccines ever rolled out.

It is now apparent that the number of adverse events not reported to VAERS runs into the tens of  millions.

This rather begs the question. What is the validity of clinical trails and under-reporting factor for all other vaccines?

The degree of harm is important as is the risk to benefit analysis, but if you do not have the data how can you do the analysis?

The Lazarus report from 2010 concluded that less than 1% (0.87%) – fewer than one in 100 - of vaccine harms were reported. There have been many reports of fundamentally flawed clinical trials – so flawed the placebo is an existing vaccine.

The Lazarus Report – Decoding the Deception

“Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs and vaccines that endanger public health. New surveillance methods for drug and vaccine adverse effects are needed.”

It is a breach of Federal regulations to fail to report an adverse event.

download (fda.gov)

Healthcare providers are required by law to report certain adverse events. To get a list of these, please call 1-800-822-7967 or go to www.vaers.hhs.gov/reportable.htm.

I you click the link to these certain adverse events you might get this response:

www.vaers.hhs.gov “Hmmm… can't reach this page” - if you are using a Bing browser.

So, in theory, anyone suppressing somebody else’s report or failing to report certain adverse events should be banned from any involvement in the practise of medicine.

Of course, the depth of harm is relevant. In Pfizer’s clinical trials, total adverse events are further broken down into “Severe” – life altering, and “Serous” – life threatening – which seems as good a way to further categorise the events.

Where am I going with this?

Well, for all we know, the “serious” and “severe” adverse events from any vaccine are  at least 100 times worse than the “events” reported to VAERS in two ways.

1.      Symptoms and deaths from vaccinations occur over a long period

2.      Symptoms and deaths are not associated with vaccinations - ever.

Conspiracy hypothesis – the adverse events from vaccinations have never been examined over the long term – only the impact on the “target” condition/disease.

The under reporting – and failure to diagnose – of adverse events, could mean that all increases in deleterious health conditions – from ADD, to Alzheimer’s to obesity – are directly caused by vaccinations – with no measurement of risk/benefit.

My bet? The under-reporting of adverse events is not the one in 100 calculated by the Lazarus report a decade ago. It ranges between 250 and 2,000 for certain conditions.

Of course the regulatory bodies in charge of health, from the WHO to the alphabet soup of the HHS complex have zero interest or motivation to promulgate any “safe and effective” vaccine along the dimensions of time and adverse events.

It does rather beg another question: Are the deadly C19 mRNA injections any worse than the majority of all other vaccines? (Some vaccines must work, surely!).

A comparison of adverse events from C19 mRNA injections with an under reporting factor of 28-40 with adverse events over decades must also take into account the massive under reporting factor of other vaccines.

Onwards!

Please subscribe, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan