War breaks out in the UK medical profession – between the British Medical Association and the General Medical Council
A few weeks late on this story.
In the blue corner – weighing in with 173,000 members is the British Medical Association - The BMA UK council sets the strategic direction of the association in line with policy decided by the representative body. The association does not regulate or certify doctors, a responsibility which lies with the General Medical Council. The BMA UK council is the principal executive committee of the trade union. It sets the strategic direction of the association in line with policy decided by the representative body. Council is responsible for the formulation and implementation of policy throughout the year between annual representative meetings.
In the red corner – weighing in with the grace and favour of political privilege is the General Medical Council – the body that oversaw the catastrophic response to C19 by enacting protocols set down by Midazolam Matt Hancock. The General Medical Council (GMC) is a public body that maintains the official register of general practitioners within the UK. Its chief responsibility is to "protect, promote and maintain the health and safety of the public" by controlling entry to the register, and suspending or removing members when necessary.
Council members - GMC (gmc-uk.org)
Imagine being subject to the whims of a bunch of failed upwards quacks!
So, what’s the beef?
From here:
BMA declares it has no confidence in the GMC - Pulse Today
“The BMA’s Annual Representative Meeting has passed a no confidence vote for the GMC, and will now call for its leadership’s dismissal.
The motion also said that ‘too many’ Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) fitness-to-practise (FTP) decisions are ‘disproportionate to the error of the doctors mistake’ and expressed no confidence in the current tribunal.
During the meeting taking place in Liverpool today, representatives voted in favour of a motion calling for the leadership team of the GMC to be dismissed and replaced with a team that ‘commands the confidence and support of the medical profession’.
Sounds like the medics are hacked off that the regulator applies the corrupt practices of the UK government in enforcing medical mandates of no benefit to patients AND objects to being censored and fired for even having the temerity to discuss major issues – you know, like vaccine injuries, futility of lockdowns, masking and testing – and perhaps the use of DNR’s and midazolam=morphine as a de facto reincarnation of the“Liverpool Care pathway for the dying patient”.
Onwards
Please upgrade to paid, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan Buying just one Ko-Fi a week for $3 is 50 bucks more than an annual $100 subscription!
Too bad the best we can expect from a "no confidence" is a replacement with even WORSE ethics.
It is the system itself that is the problem. The very idea an "organization" can prescribe drugs and other medical procedures (practice medicine) is the problem. In ALL 50 U.S. States no political body, association, membership, or other "group" may LAWFULLY practice medicine, on either an individual or a group of people. And yet, our legislatures continually pass laws mandating drugs on the general public, in violation of CRIMINAL laws which prohibit the practice of medicine without a license. Again, no "group" can be granted a license to practice medicine.
Time to enforce the laws which ALREADY make all of this crap totally criminal.
Who knew? Brit doctors have balls!
Not so Canadian and American geldings., with a few notable exceptions.